The effect of local luminance contrast on induced motion

Recently it has been suggested that the magnocellular, as opposed to the parvocellular, subsystem of the primary visual pathway of primates subserves motion perception. This suggestion is partly based on the observation that both the visual responses of magnocellular neural units and certain motion perception phenomena have high contrast sensitivity and are only dependent on luminance contrast for a narrow range of low contrasts. Parvocellular units have low contrast sensitivity and are dependent on contrast for a wide range of values. In the present experiment, the effect of local luminance contrast on induced motion was measured using a nulling procedure to quantify the magnitude, of illusory motion perceived in a centre grating which was viewed against a moving surround grafting. Centre grating contrast was either matched to the surround or maintained at a low (2.5%) or high (60%) value. Surround contrast ranged from 2.5% to 60%. It was found that (1) centre contrast had no observable effect on the magnitude of the illusion, (2) induced motion was marginal or absent with low contrast but detectable surrounds, and (3) induced motion increased as contrast in the surround increased for the range of contrasts tested. This contrast response function is more similar to that of parvocellular than magnocellular units and therefore suggests that the parvocellular stream may play a role in some aspects of motion processing.

[1]  A. Pantle,et al.  Physiological Basis of Motion Perception , 1978 .

[2]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Spatial and velocity tuning of processes underlying induced motion , 1984, Vision Research.

[3]  W. B. Spatz.  An efferent connection of the solitary cells of Meynert. A study with horseradish peroxidase in the marmoset Callithrix , 1975, Brain Research.

[4]  A. Johnston,et al.  Lower thresholds of motion for gratings as a function of eccentricity and contrast , 1985, Vision Research.

[5]  R. Shapley,et al.  The primate retina contains two types of ganglion cells, with high and low contrast sensitivity. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  O E Favreau,et al.  Perceived velocity of moving chromatic gratings. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[7]  W. C. Gogel.  SIZE CUES AND THE ADJACENCY PRINCIPLE. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Detection and discrimination of sinusoidal grating displacements. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[10]  J. Lund,et al.  The origin of efferent pathways from the primary visual cortex, area 17, of the macaque monkey as shown by retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Relative motion induced between stationary lines , 1978, Vision Research.

[12]  R. Shapley,et al.  X and Y cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys. , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Biological image motion processing: A review , 1985, Vision Research.

[14]  M. Sanders.  Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[15]  P. Thompson.  Perceived rate of movement depends on contrast , 1982, Vision Research.

[16]  K. Duncker,et al.  Über induzierte Bewegung , 1929 .

[17]  F. Campbell,et al.  The influence of spatial frequency and contrast on the perception of moving patterns , 1981, Vision Research.

[18]  S. Zeki.  Representation of central visual fields in prestriate cortex of monkey. , 1969, Brain research.

[19]  V. S. RAMACHANDRAN,et al.  Does colour provide an input to human motion perception? , 1978, Nature.

[20]  A Pantle,et al.  On the Capacity of Directionally Selective Mechanisms to Encode Different Dimensions of Moving Stimuli , 1978, Perception.

[21]  P. Lennie,et al.  Chromatic mechanisms in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  S. McKee,et al.  Precise velocity discrimination despite random variations in temporal frequency and contrast , 1986, Vision Research.

[23]  A. Pantle,et al.  Motion aftereffect as a function of the contrast of sinusoidal gratings , 1976, Vision Research.

[24]  DH Hubel,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Segregation of efferent connections and receptive field properties in visual area V2 of the macaque , 1985, Nature.

[26]  Clifton Schor,et al.  The influence of field size upon the spatial frequency response of optokinetic nystagmus , 1981, Vision Research.

[27]  P. Lennie,et al.  Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  S. Zeki,et al.  Segregation of pathways leading from area V2 to areas V4 and V5 of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1985, Nature.

[29]  J Allman,et al.  Direction- and Velocity-Specific Responses from beyond the Classical Receptive Field in the Middle Temporal Visual Area (MT) , 1985, Perception.