Dye staining and excavation of a lateral preferential flow network.

Abstract. Preferential flow paths have been found to be important for runoff generation, solute transport, and slope stability in many areas around the world. Although many studies have identified the particular characteristics of individual features and measured the runoff generation and solute transport within hillslopes, very few studies have determined how individual features are hydraulically connected at a hillslope scale. In this study, we used dye staining and excavation to determine the morphology and spatial pattern of a preferential flow network over a large scale (30 m). We explore the feasibility of extending small-scale dye staining techniques to the hillslope scale. We determine the lateral preferential flow paths that are active during the steady-state flow conditions and their interaction with the surrounding soil matrix. We also calculate the velocities of the flow through each cross-section of the hillslope and compare them to hillslope scale applied tracer measurements. Finally, we investigate the relationship between the contributing area and the characteristics of the preferential flow paths. The experiment revealed that larger contributing areas coincided with highly developed and hydraulically connected preferential flow paths that had flow with little interaction with the surrounding soil matrix. We found evidence of subsurface erosion and deposition of soil and organic material laterally and vertically within the soil. These results are important because they add to the understanding of the runoff generation, solute transport, and slope stability of preferential flow-dominated hillslopes.

[1]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  A rationale for old water discharge through macropores in a steep, humid catchment. , 1990 .

[2]  M. Mosley.  Streamflow generation in a forested watershed, New Zealand , 1979 .

[3]  J. Bouma,et al.  The Function of Different Types of Macropores During Saturated Flow through Four Swelling Soil Horizons1 , 1977 .

[4]  Shoji Noguchi,et al.  Morphological Characteristics of Macropores and the Distribution of Preferential Flow Pathways in a Forested Slope Segment , 1999 .

[5]  A. Plamondon,et al.  Snowmelt runoff pathways in a boreal forest hillslope, the role of pipe throughflow , 1987 .

[6]  R. Moore,et al.  Throughflow variability on a forested hillslope underlain by compacted glacial till , 2000 .

[7]  M. Church,et al.  Suspended sediment transport regime in a debris‐flow gully on Vancouver Island, British Columbia , 2005 .

[8]  T. Pierson,et al.  Soil pipes and slope stability , 1983, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[9]  Joseph Holden,et al.  Application of ground‐penetrating radar to the identification of subsurface piping in blanket peat , 2002 .

[10]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  A new tool for hillslope hydrologists: spatially distributed groundwater level and soilwater content measured using electromagnetic induction , 2003 .

[11]  M. Flury,et al.  Sorption of Brilliant Blue FCF in soils as affected by pH and ionic strength , 2000 .

[12]  M. Tani.  Runoff generation processes estimated from hydrological observations on a steep forested hillslope with a thin soil layer , 1997 .

[13]  Karin Laursen,et al.  A conceptual model of preferential flow systems in forested hillslopes: evidence of self‐organization , 2001 .

[14]  Tomomi Terajima,et al.  Morphology, structure and flow phases in soil pipes developing in forested hillslopes underlain by a Quaternary sand–gravel formation, Hokkaido, northern main island in Japan , 2000 .

[15]  Takahisa Mizuyama,et al.  Runoff characteristics of pipeflow and effects of pipeflow on rainfall-runoff phenomena in a mountainous watershed , 1999 .

[16]  Soil,et al.  Soil pipes and slope stability in Hong Kong , 1986, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[17]  R. Fannin,et al.  Hydrological response of hillslope soils above a debris-slide headscarp , 1999 .

[18]  Younes Alila,et al.  Subsurface flow velocities in a hillslope with lateral preferential flow , 2009 .

[19]  Yoshinori Tsukamoto,et al.  Runoff process on a steep forested slope , 1988 .

[20]  R J Fannin,et al.  An empirical-statistical model for debris flow travel distance , 2001 .

[21]  Keith Beven,et al.  The role of bedrock topography on subsurface storm flow , 2002 .

[22]  Hannes Flühler,et al.  Tracer Characteristics of Brilliant Blue FCF , 1995 .

[23]  Y. Onda.  Seepage erosion and its implication to the formation of amphitheatre valley heads : a case study at Obara, Japan , 1994 .

[24]  William A. Jury,et al.  A Field Study Using Dyes to Characterize Preferential Flow of Water , 1990 .

[25]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Hydrologic Processes in a Low-Gradient Source Area , 1995 .

[26]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 1. A 147‐storm analysis of the Panola hillslope , 2006 .

[27]  Takahisa Mizuyama,et al.  Effects of pipeflow on hydrological process and its relation to landslide: a review of pipeflow studies in forested headwater catchments , 2001 .

[28]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  The role of lateral pipe flow in hillslope runoff response: an intercomparison of non-linear hillslope response , 2005 .

[29]  Hannes Flühler,et al.  Inferring flow types from dye patterns in macroporous soils , 2004 .

[30]  Shoji Noguchi,et al.  Stormflow generation in steep forested headwaters: a linked hydrogeomorphic paradigm , 2000 .

[31]  R. Sidle,et al.  A distributed slope stability model for steep forested basins , 1995 .

[32]  R. Fannin,et al.  Hydrologic response of soils to precipitation at Carnation Creek, British Columbia, Canada , 2000 .

[33]  Shoji Noguchi,et al.  Seasonal hydrologic response at various spatial scales in a small forested catchment, Hitachi Ohta, Japan , 1995 .

[34]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 2. The fill and spill hypothesis , 2006 .

[35]  J. A. Jones,et al.  Factors controlling the distribution of piping in Britain: a reconnaissance , 1997 .

[36]  Shoji Noguchi,et al.  Flow and solute transport through the soil matrix and macropores of a hillslope segment , 1994 .

[37]  J. Buttle,et al.  Runoff Production in a Forested, Shallow Soil, Canadian Shield Basin , 1995 .

[38]  R. Sidle.  Groundwater accretion in unstable hillslopes of coastal Alaska , 1986 .

[39]  T. Terajima,et al.  Suspended sediment discharge in subsurface flow from the head hollow of a small forested watershed, northern Japan , 1997 .

[40]  D. Montgomery,et al.  A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding , 1994 .