The Effect of Thematic Roles on Pronoun Use and Frequency of Reference Continuation

Goal and source thematic roles have been shown to influence pronoun resolution, an effect that has been linked to the reader's tendency to focus on the consequences of the event (Stevenson, Crawley, & Kleinman, 1994). Using a story continuation experiment, I show that speakers also tend to use pronouns more often for goal entities than source entities. Furthermore, the experiment and a corpus analysis reveal that speakers tend to refer more frequently to goal entities than source entities overall. I use the parallel findings about pronoun use and frequency of reference continuation to argue that referent accessibility is influenced by the comprehender's estimate of the likelihood that a referent will be continued in the discourse.

[1]  Susan F. Schmerlinc Asymmetric Conjunction and Rules of Conversation , 1975 .

[2]  Roger S. Brown,et al.  The psychological causality implicit in language , 1983, Cognition.

[3]  G. Simpson Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Terry Kit-fong Au,et al.  A Verb Is Worth a Thousand Words: The Causes and Consequences of Interpersonal Events Implicit in Language. , 1986 .

[6]  Eve Sweetser From Etymology To Pragmatics , 1990 .

[7]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[8]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access , 1991 .

[9]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  J. M. Golding,et al.  Superordinate goal inferences: Are they automatically generated during comprehension? , 1993 .

[11]  M. MacDonald The interaction of lexical and syntactic ambiguity , 1993 .

[12]  Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al.  Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events , 1994 .

[13]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[14]  Cynthia L Fisher,et al.  Structure and meaning in the verb lexicon: Input for a syntax-aided verb learning procedure , 1994 .

[15]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994 .

[16]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[17]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Learning words in nonostensive contexts , 1994 .

[18]  Janet L. McDonald,et al.  THE TIME COURSE OF ANAPHOR RESOLUTION: EFFECTS OF IMPLICIT VERB CAUSALITY AND GENDER , 1995 .

[19]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints , 1995, Cognition.

[20]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Models of Understanding Text , 1996 .

[21]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[22]  A. Garnham,et al.  The Locus of Implicit Causality Effects in Comprehension. , 1996, Journal of memory and language.

[23]  E. Newport,et al.  WORD SEGMENTATION : THE ROLE OF DISTRIBUTIONAL CUES , 1996 .

[24]  J. Trueswell THE ROLE OF LEXICAL FREQUENCY IN SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION , 1996 .

[25]  Jennifer E. Arnold Reference form and discourse patterns , 1998 .

[26]  E. Newport,et al.  Computation of Conditional Probability Statistics by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1998 .

[27]  A. Woodward Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach , 1998, Cognition.

[28]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering , 2015 .

[29]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking , 2000, Cognition.

[30]  J. Oberlander,et al.  Interpreting pronouns and connectives: Interactions among focusing, thematic roles and coherence relations , 2000 .

[31]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  The Time Course of the Influence of Implicit Causality Information: Focusing versus Integration Accounts , 2000 .