Firm-level Inefficiency in Post-transition Economies

Firms in post-transition economies are frequently considered less efficient than those in more advanced market economies. By relying on the World Bank Enterprise Survey for the year 2019, firm-level technical inefficiency is estimated by the stochastic frontier analysis method for a sample of European post-transition countries. To be precise, the analysis included Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, North Macedonia, Poland, Serbia, and Slovenia. Furthermore, the factors contributing to the firm-level inefficiency are explored in a comparative setting. The effects of the international orientation of the firm, foreign ownership, doing business with the government sector, presence of informal competitors, innovation activity, manager experience, and the age of the firm on the technical inefficiency are estimated. Results show that although some factors are common to a subsample of countries, not a single factor is significant in all the analysed economies. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

[1]  M. Nieto,et al.  Home country institutions and exports of firms in transition economies: Does innovation matter? , 2021 .

[2]  A. Ledeneva,et al.  The Rules of the Game in Transition: How Informal Institutions Work in South East Europe , 2021, The Palgrave Handbook of Comparative Economics.

[3]  S. Jakšić,et al.  Export and total factor productivity of EU new member states , 2020 .

[4]  David C. Francis,et al.  Measuring Total Factor Productivity using the Enterprise Surveys: A Methodological Note , 2020, Policy Research Working Papers.

[5]  M. A. Esquivias,et al.  Does competition and foreign investment spur industrial efficiency?: firm-level evidence from Indonesia , 2020, Heliyon.

[6]  B. Mazorodze.  Trade and efficiency of manufacturing industries in South Africa , 2020, The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development.

[7]  Amandine Crespy,et al.  What “Brussels” means by structural reforms: empty signifier or constructive ambiguity? , 2019 .

[8]  Diego Morris.  Innovation and productivity among heterogeneous firms , 2018, Research Policy.

[9]  Ian A. Wright,et al.  Exports, foreign ownership, and firm-level efficiency in Ethiopia and Kenya: an application of the stochastic frontier model , 2018, Empirical Economics.

[10]  J. Gilbert,et al.  Export competitiveness of Central and Eastern Europe since the enlargement of the EU , 2018 .

[11]  C. Williams,et al.  EXPLAINING CROSS-NATIONAL VARIATIONS IN THE PREVALENCE OF INFORMAL SECTOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP: LESSONS FROM A SURVEY OF 142 COUNTRIES , 2018 .

[12]  D. Mihaljek.  Convergence in Central and Eastern Europe: Can All Get to EU Average? , 2018 .

[13]  Z. Tao,et al.  Identifying FDI spillovers , 2017 .

[14]  Igor Stubelj,et al.  Corporate purpose in a small post-transitional economy: the case of Slovenia , 2017 .

[15]  D. Rodrik.  The Elusive Promise of Structural Reform , 2017 .

[16]  L. Božić,et al.  Explaining firm-level total factor productivity in post-transition: manufacturing vs. services sector , 2017 .

[17]  Petr Matous,et al.  The strength of long ties and the weakness of strong ties: Knowledge diffusion through supply chain networks , 2016 .

[18]  S. Suyanto,et al.  The spillover effects of foreign direct investment on the firms’ productivity performances , 2016, Journal of Productivity Analysis.

[19]  B. Bierut,et al.  Competitiveness and Export Performance of CEE Countries , 2016 .

[20]  Teerawat Charoenrat,et al.  Thai manufacturing small and medium sized enterprise technical efficiency: evidence from firm-level industrial census data , 2013 .

[21]  N. A. Khalifah.  Ownership and technical efficiency in Malaysia's automotive industry: A stochastic frontier production function analysis , 2013 .

[22]  J Wagner,et al.  International trade and firm performance: a survey of empirical studies since 2006 , 2012, Review of World Economics.

[23]  Sorin M. S. Krammer.  Do good institutions enhance the effect of technological spillovers on productivity ? Comparative evidence from developed and transition economies Version 1 , 2017 .

[24]  R. Aidis,et al.  Size matters: entrepreneurial entry and government , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[25]  Thomas J. Chemmanur,et al.  Management Quality, Financial and Investment Policies, and Asymmetric Information , 2007, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[26]  V. Kravtsova.  Foreign presence and efficiency in transition economies , 2008 .

[27]  R. Taagepera,et al.  Corruption, Culture, and Communism , 2005 .

[28]  Kyrgyz-Turkish.  A Comparative Analysis of Productivity Growth , Catch-Up and Convergence in Transition Economies , 2002 .

[29]  Colin Thirtle,et al.  A Stochastic Frontier Approach to Firm Level Efficiency, Technological Change, and Productivity during the Early Transition in Hungary , 2000 .

[30]  J. Brada,et al.  INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS OF THE TRANSITION: DETERMINANTS OF ENTERPRISE EFFICIENCY IN CZECHOSLOVAKIA AND HUNGARY , 1997 .