Co-optimizing water-alternating-carbon dioxide injection projects using a machine learning assisted computational framework

Abstract In this article, a robust machine-learning-based computational framework that couples multi-layer neural network (MLNN) proxies and a multi-objective particle swarm optimizer (MOPSO) to design water-alternating-carbon dioxide injection (CO2-WAG) projects is presented. The proposed optimization protocol considers various objectives, including oil recovery and CO2 storage volume. Expert MLNN systems are trained and employed as surrogate models of the high-fidelity compositional simulator in the optimization workflow. When multiple objective functions are considered, two approaches are employed to treat the objectives: the weighted sum method and the Pareto-front-based scheme. A field-scale implementation focusing on tertiary recovery in the Morrow B formation at Farnsworth Unit (FWU) is presented. The developed Pareto-optimal solutions indicate the maximal available oil production can be 1.64 × 107 barrels and maximal carbon storage can achieve 2.35 × 107 tons. Trade-offs factor is defined to divide the constructed Pareto front into 4 sections with the trade-off factors’ value ranges from 0.35 to 49.9. This work also compares the optimum solution found by the aggregative objective function and the solution repository covered by the Pareto front that considers the physical and operational constraints and reduces uncertainties involved by the multi-objective optimization process. Our comparison indicates multiple solutions exist to satisfy the objective criteria of the WAG design, and these results cannot be found using the traditional weighted sum method. The Pareto front solution can provide more options for project designers, but decisions regarding necessary trade-offs must be made using the solution repository to balance the project economics and CO2 storage amount.

[1]  Qian Sun,et al.  The Development of Artificial-neural-network-based Universal Proxies to Study Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) and Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS) Processes , 2015 .

[2]  Michael Andrew Christie,et al.  Use of Multi-Objective Algorithms in History Matching of a Real Field , 2013, ANSS 2013.

[3]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Optimization using surrogate models and partially converged computational fluid dynamics simulations , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[4]  Yongming Han,et al.  Review: Multi-objective optimization methods and application in energy saving , 2017 .

[5]  Andrew Wigston,et al.  A study on the impact of SO2 on CO2 injectivity for CO2 storage in a Canadian saline aquifer , 2016 .

[6]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models , 1998 .

[7]  Mohammad Ali Ahmadi,et al.  Neural network based swarm concept for prediction asphaltene precipitation due to natural depletion , 2012 .

[8]  Denis José Schiozer,et al.  Risk Analysis Speed-Up With Surrogate Models , 2012 .

[9]  Mark D. White,et al.  Numerical simulation of carbon dioxide injection in the western section of the farnsworth unit , 2014 .

[10]  Nuriye Say,et al.  Energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Turkey: Empirical analysis and future projection based on an economic growth , 2006 .

[11]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in the recovery and extraction of crude bitumen from Canada’s oil sands , 2015 .

[12]  Bing Zhu,et al.  Scenario analysis of CO2 emissions from China’s civil aviation industry through 2030 , 2016 .

[13]  A. Conn,et al.  Optimization of petroleum production networks – Through proxy models and structural constraints , 2012 .

[14]  Madhav M. Kulkarni,et al.  Experimental investigation of miscible and immiscible water-alternating-gas (WAG) process performance , 2005 .

[15]  C. Mason,et al.  Co-Optimization of Enhanced Oil Recovery and Carbon Sequestration , 2009 .

[16]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  Building Surrogate Models Based on Detailed and Approximate , 2004, DAC 2004.

[17]  Philip H. Stauffer,et al.  Heterogeneity-assisted carbon dioxide storage in marine sediments , 2018, Applied Energy.

[18]  Robert Will,et al.  Co‐optimization of CO2‐EOR and storage processes in mature oil reservoirs , 2017 .

[19]  Hochang Jang,et al.  Prediction of storage efficiency on CO2 sequestration in deep saline aquifers using artificial neural network , 2017 .

[20]  Jiang Xie,et al.  Improved Proxy For History Matching Using Proxy-for-data Approach And Reduced Order Modeling , 2015 .

[21]  Mark White,et al.  CO2 Accounting and Risk Analysis for CO2 Sequestration at Enhanced Oil Recovery Sites. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Michael Andrew Christie,et al.  On Optimal Selection of Objective Grouping for Multiobjective History Matching , 2017 .

[23]  Li He,et al.  An integrated simulation, inference, and optimization method for identifying groundwater remediation strategies at petroleum-contaminated aquifers in western Canada. , 2008, Water research.

[24]  J. Jansen,et al.  Generation of a Pareto front for a bi-objective water flooding optimization problem using approximate ensemble gradients , 2016 .

[25]  Ajay K. Ray,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization of Industrial Petroleum Processing Units Using Genetic Algorithms , 2014 .

[26]  Nilay Shah,et al.  The role of CO 2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change , 2017 .

[27]  Albert C. Reynolds,et al.  Gradient-based multi-objective optimization with applications to waterflooding optimization , 2016, Computational Geosciences.

[28]  I. Grossmann,et al.  An algorithm for the use of surrogate models in modular flowsheet optimization , 2008 .

[29]  Xiaofan Lai,et al.  A multi-objective optimization for green supply chain network design , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[30]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Generalized Differential Evolution for Numerical and Evolutionary Optimization , 2015, NEO.

[31]  Peter Viebahn,et al.  Prospects of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in India’s power sector – An integrated assessment , 2014 .

[32]  V. Kuuskraa,et al.  Opportunities for Using Anthropogenic CO2 for Enhanced Oil Recovery and CO2 Storage , 2013 .

[33]  Salvador Pintos,et al.  Surrogate modeling-based optimization for the integration of static and dynamic data into a reservoir description , 2002 .

[34]  Gokhan Aydin,et al.  The Modeling and Projection of Primary Energy Consumption by the Sources , 2015 .

[35]  H. Khatib IEA World Energy Outlook 2011—A comment , 2012 .

[36]  Les E. Atlas,et al.  Recurrent neural networks and robust time series prediction , 1994, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[37]  Aylin Çiğdem Köne,et al.  Forecasting of CO2 emissions from fuel combustion using trend analysis , 2010 .

[38]  Gokhan Aydin,et al.  The Development and Validation of Regression Models to Predict Energy-related CO2 Emissions in Turkey , 2015 .

[39]  Albert C. Reynolds,et al.  Ensemble-Based Optimization of the Water-Alternating-Gas-Injection Process , 2016 .

[40]  Akhil Datta-Gupta,et al.  Handling conflicting multiple objectives using Pareto-based evolutionary algorithm during history matching of reservoir performance , 2015 .

[41]  Jonathan G. Koomey,et al.  WHAT CAN HISTORY TEACH US? A Retrospective Examination of Long-Term Energy Forecasts for the United States* , 2002 .

[42]  Susan D. Hovorka,et al.  Geologic carbon storage through enhanced oil recovery. , 2013 .

[43]  Iraj Ershaghi,et al.  Reservoir Characterization Using Fuzzy Kriging and Deep Learning Neural Networks , 2016 .

[44]  A. Jiménez‐Valverde,et al.  The ghost of unbalanced species distribution data in geographical model predictions , 2006 .

[45]  Xi Jiang,et al.  A review of physical modelling and numerical simulation of long-term geological storage of CO2 , 2011 .

[46]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[47]  Mohammad Ali Ahmadi,et al.  Developing a Robust Surrogate Model of Chemical Flooding Based on the Artificial Neural Network for Enhanced Oil Recovery Implications , 2015 .

[48]  R. Marler,et al.  The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization: new insights , 2010 .

[49]  W. Gunter,et al.  Large CO2 Sinks: Their role in the mitigation of greenhouse gases from an international, national (Canadian) and provincial (Alberta) perspective , 1998 .

[50]  Bjarne Grimstad,et al.  Global optimization of multiphase flow networks using spline surrogate models , 2016, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[51]  Robert Balch,et al.  Optimum design of CO 2 storage and oil recovery under geological uncertainty , 2017 .

[52]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  INTEGRATION OF GENETIC ALGORITHM, COMPUTER SIMULATION AND DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS FOR FORECASTING ELECTRICAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION , 2007 .

[53]  S. Sharma Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions: Empirical evidence from 69 countries , 2011 .

[54]  Lixiao Zhang,et al.  Scenario analysis of urban energy saving and carbon abatement policies: A case study of Beijing city, China , 2012 .

[55]  G. Aydin,et al.  Production Modeling in the Oil and Natural Gas Industry: An Application of Trend Analysis , 2014 .

[56]  Palash Panja,et al.  Factors That Control Condensate Production From Shales: Surrogate Reservoir Models and Uncertainty Analysis , 2016 .

[57]  Tarek R. Sheltami,et al.  Support Vector Machines Framework for Predicting the PVT Properties of Crude Oil Systems , 2007 .