Opening the Black Box: Structural Factor Models Versus Structural Vars

In this Paper we study identification in dynamic factor models and argue that factor models are better suited than VARs to provide a structural representation of the macroeconomy. Factor models distinguish measurement errors and other idiosyncratic disturbances from structural macroeconomic shocks. As a consequence, the number of structural shocks is no longer equal to the number of variables included in the information set. In practice, the number of structural shocks turns out to be small, so that only a few restrictions are needed to reach identification. Economic interpretation is then easier. On the other hand, with factor models we can handle much larger information sets - including virtually all existing macroeconomic information. This solves the problems of superior information and fundamentality and enables us to analyse the effects of the shocks on all macroeconomic variables. In the empirical illustration we study a set of 89 US macroeconomic time series, including the series analysed in the seminal paper of King et al. (1991). We find that the system of impulse response functions of these series is non-fundamental and therefore cannot be estimated with a VAR. Moreover, unlike in King et al. (1991), the impulse response functions of the permanent shock are monotonic and therefore more credible if the permanent shock is interpreted as technical change.

[1]  J. Stock,et al.  Macroeconomic Forecasting Using Diffusion Indexes , 2002 .

[2]  D. Brillinger.  Time series - data analysis and theory , 1981, Classics in applied mathematics.

[3]  Christopher A. Sims,et al.  Comment on Glenn Rudebusch's "Do Measures of Monetary Policy in a VAR Make Sense?" , 1998 .

[4]  J. Bai,et al.  Determining the Number of Factors in Approximate Factor Models , 2000 .

[5]  Lucrezia Reichlin,et al.  Federal policies and local economies: Europe and the US , 2001 .

[6]  L. Kilian.  Small-sample Confidence Intervals for Impulse Response Functions , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[7]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Arbitrage, Factor Structure, and Mean-Variance Analysis on Large Asset Markets , 1982 .

[8]  M. Hallin,et al.  The Generalized Dynamic-Factor Model: Identification and Estimation , 2000, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[9]  Marco Lippi,et al.  The Generalized Dynamic Factor Model , 2002 .

[10]  Lawrence J. Christiano,et al.  Monetary Policy Shocks: What Have We Learned and to What End? , 1998 .

[11]  Thomas J. Sargent,et al.  Business cycle modeling without pretending to have too much a priori economic theory , 1976 .

[12]  Marco Lippi,et al.  Coincident and leading indicators for the Euro area , 2001 .

[13]  Marco Lippi,et al.  THE GENERALIZED DYNAMIC FACTOR MODEL: REPRESENTATION THEORY , 2001, Econometric Theory.

[14]  J. Stock,et al.  Diffusion Indexes , 1998 .

[15]  H. Uhlig.  What are the Effects of Monetary Policy on Output? : Results from an Agnostic Identification Procedure , 2005 .

[16]  D. Quah.  Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with Funding from Boston Library Consortium Iviember Libraries of Economics Permanent and Transitory Movements in Labor Income: an Explanation for "excess Smoothness" in Consumption , 2022 .

[17]  Glenn D. Rudebusch.  Do Measures of Monetary Policy in a VAR Make Sense , 1998 .

[18]  P. Gregg,et al.  King Charles I , 1981 .

[19]  Olivier J. Blanchard,et al.  The Dynamic Effects of Aggregate Demand and Supply Disturbances , 1988 .

[20]  Charles I. Plosser,et al.  Stochastic Trends and Economic Fluctuations , 1987 .

[21]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Arbitrage, Factor Structure, and Mean-Variance Analysis on Large Asset Markets , 1983 .

[22]  Clive W. J. Granger.  Implications of Aggregation with Common Factors , 1987 .

[23]  Lucrezia Reichlin,et al.  Dynamic common factors in large cross-sections , 1996 .

[24]  P. Whittle,et al.  Latent Variables in Socio‐Economic Models , 1978 .

[25]  Lucrezia Reichlin,et al.  Let's Get Real: A Factor Analytical Approach to Disaggregated Business Cycle Dynamics , 1998 .

[26]  Marco Lippi,et al.  The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances: comment , 1993 .

[27]  David R. Brillinger,et al.  Time Series: Data Analysis and Theory. , 1982 .

[28]  C. Sims,et al.  Vector Autoregressions , 1999 .

[29]  Gary Chamberlain,et al.  FUNDS, FACTORS, AND DIVERSIFICATION IN ARBITRAGE PRICING MODELS , 1983 .

[30]  Marco Lippi,et al.  Aggregation and the Microfoundations of Dynamic Macroeconomics , 1998 .

[31]  C. Sims,et al.  What Does Monetary Policy Do , 1996 .

[32]  J. Stock,et al.  Forecasting Using Principal Components From a Large Number of Predictors , 2002 .

[33]  Gregory Connor,et al.  Risk and Return in an Equilibrium Apt: Application of a New Test Methodology , 1988 .

[34]  Marco Lippi,et al.  VAR analysis, non-fundamental representations, Blashke matrices , 1994 .

[35]  J. Cochrane.  What Do the Vars Mean?: Measuring the Output Effects of Monetary Policy , 1995 .

[36]  Marco Lippi,et al.  The generalized dynamic factor model: consistency and rates , 2004 .

[37]  Marco Lippi,et al.  VAR analysis, nonfundamental representations, Blaschke matrices , 1994 .

[38]  Domenico Giannone,et al.  Tracking Greenspan: Systematic and Unsystematic Monetary Policy Revisited , 2002 .

[39]  Jon Faust,et al.  The Robustness of Identified VAR Conclusions About Money , 1998 .