Automata theory based on quantum logic: some characterizations

Automata theory based on quantum logic (abbr. l-valued automata theory) may be viewed as a logical approach of quantum computation. In this paper, we characterize some fundamental properties of l-valued automata theory, and discover that some properties of the truth-value lattices of the underlying logic are equivalent to certain properties of automata. More specifically (i) the transition relations of l-valued automata are extended to describe the transitions enabled by strings of input symbols, and particularly, these extensions depend on the distributivity of the truth-value lattices (Proposition 3.1); (ii) some properties of the l-valued successor and source operators and l-valued subautomata are demonstrated to be equivalent to a property of the truth-value lattices which is exactly equivalent to the distributive law (Proposition 4.3 and Corollary 4.4). This is a new characterization of Boolean algebras in the framework of l-valued automata theory; (iii) we verify that the intersection of two l-valued subautomata is still an l-valued subautomaton if and only if the multiplication (&) is distributive over the union in the truth-value lattices (Proposition 4.5), which is strictly weaker than the usual distributivity; (iv) we show that some topological characterizations in terms of the l-valued successor and source operators also rely on the distributivity of truth-value lattices (Theorem 5.6). Finally, we address some related topics for further study.

[1]  Some general probabilistic quantum cloning and deleting machines , 2003 .

[2]  Sylvia Pulmannová,et al.  Orthomodular structures as quantum logics , 1991 .

[3]  Lov K. Grover A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search , 1996, STOC '96.

[4]  G. Doolen,et al.  Introduction to Quantum Computers , 1998 .

[5]  Qiu Daowen,et al.  Automata theory based on complete residuated lattice-valued logic , 2001 .

[6]  C. Monroe,et al.  Quantum information processing with atoms and photons , 2002, Nature.

[7]  Pedram Khalili Amiri,et al.  Quantum computers , 2003 .

[8]  Daowen Qiu Non-optimal universal quantum deleting machine , 2002 .

[9]  Karl Svozil,et al.  Quantum Logic , 1998, Discrete mathematics and theoretical computer science.

[10]  L. Román,et al.  Quantum logic revisited , 1991 .

[11]  Arun K. Srivastava,et al.  A Topology for Automata: A Note , 1976, Inf. Control..

[12]  Azaria Paz,et al.  Introduction to probabilistic automata (Computer science and applied mathematics) , 1971 .

[13]  G. Guo,et al.  Probabilistic Cloning and Identification of Linearly Independent Quantum States , 1998, quant-ph/9804064.

[14]  I. Chuang,et al.  Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: Bibliography , 2010 .

[15]  Combinations of probabilistic and approximate quantum cloning and deleting , 2002 .

[16]  D. Deutsch Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[17]  W. Wootters,et al.  A single quantum cannot be cloned , 1982, Nature.

[18]  R. Feynman Simulating physics with computers , 1999 .

[19]  Jozef Gruska,et al.  Quantum Computing , 2008, Wiley Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Engineering.

[20]  Daowen Qiu,et al.  Quantum Pushdown Automata , 2002 .

[21]  Colin P. Williams,et al.  Explorations in quantum computing , 1997 .

[22]  Hava T. Siegelmann,et al.  Analog computation via neural networks , 1993, [1993] The 2nd Israel Symposium on Theory and Computing Systems.

[23]  James P. Crutchfield,et al.  Quantum automata and quantum grammars , 2000, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[24]  Jeffrey D. Ullman,et al.  Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation , 1979 .

[25]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Logical reversibility of computation , 1973 .

[26]  John Watrous,et al.  On the power of quantum finite state automata , 1997, Proceedings 38th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[27]  Andris Ambainis,et al.  1-way quantum finite automata: strengths, weaknesses and generalizations , 1998, Proceedings 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.98CB36280).

[28]  Peter W. Shor,et al.  Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring , 1994, Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[29]  S Lloyd,et al.  A Potentially Realizable Quantum Computer , 1993, Science.

[30]  Mingsheng Ying,et al.  Automata Theory Based on Quantum Logic II , 2000 .

[31]  L M Adleman,et al.  Molecular computation of solutions to combinatorial problems. , 1994, Science.

[32]  P. Benioff The computer as a physical system: A microscopic quantum mechanical Hamiltonian model of computers as represented by Turing machines , 1980 .

[33]  Atwell R. Turquette,et al.  On the Many-Valued Logics , 1941 .

[34]  Alex Brodsky,et al.  Characterizations of 1-Way Quantum Finite Automata , 2002, SIAM J. Comput..

[35]  J. Cirac,et al.  Quantum Computations with Cold Trapped Ions. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[36]  S. Braunstein,et al.  Impossibility of deleting an unknown quantum state , 2000, Nature.

[37]  Umesh V. Vazirani,et al.  Quantum Complexity Theory , 1997, SIAM J. Comput..

[38]  S. Massar,et al.  Optimal Quantum Cloning Machines , 1997, quant-ph/9705046.

[39]  J. Neumann,et al.  The Logic of Quantum Mechanics , 1936 .

[40]  Daowen Qiu Upper bound on the success probability of separation among quantum states , 2002 .

[41]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Handbook of Philosophical Logic , 2002 .

[42]  Daowen Qiu Some analogies between quantum cloning and quantum deleting , 2002 .

[43]  Zamir Bavel The Source as a Tool in Automata , 1971, Inf. Control..

[44]  Marco Carpentieri,et al.  Regular Languages Accepted by Quantum Automata , 2001, Inf. Comput..

[45]  Daowen Qiu,et al.  Characterization of Sequential Quantum Machines , 2002 .

[46]  Azaria Paz,et al.  Probabilistic automata , 2003 .

[47]  Azaria Paz,et al.  Introduction to Probabilistic Automata , 1971 .