Decoy oligodeoxynucleotide againstactivator protein-1 reducesneointimal proliferation after coronaryangioplasty in hypercholesterolemic minipigs

Abstract Objectives We sought to demonstrate, in an appropriate animal model, that co-medication with a transcription factor-blocking agent limits restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Background Enhanced synthesis in the vessel wall of endothelin-1 (ET-1), a powerful co-mitogen for vascular smooth muscle cells, appears to be one mechanism that promotes restenosis after PTCA. Deformation-induced expression of prepro-ET-1 is governed by the transcription factor, activator protein-1 (AP-1). Methods An anti-AP-1 decoy oligodeoxynucleotide (dODN) strategy was devised in which the dODN-containing solution (20 nmol) was administered locally through a Dispatch catheter into the coronary arteries of hypercholesterolemic minipigs at the time of PTCA (AVE-GFX stent). Results Treatment with an AP-1 dODN, mimicking the consensus binding site of the transcription factor, significantly reduced neointimal formation in the coronary arteries of hypercholesterolemic minipigs (n = 10 to 12), compared with vehicle-treated coronary arteries, after four weeks of follow-up (neointimal area 2.64 ± 0.33 vs. 4.81 ± 1.04 mm 2 [mean ± SEM]; p 2 ; n = 3) and correlated with a reduction in both nuclear translocation of AP-1 and ET-1 synthesis in the vessel wall 48 h after PTCA (n = 4). In contrast, an AP-1 mutant dODN, to which the transcription factor does not bind, showed no effect on neointimal formation at either time point (n = 3 to 7). Moreover, a consensus dODN directed against CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), another deformation-sensitive transcription factor, did not significantly affect neointimal formation after four weeks (n = 3). Conclusions These findings demonstrate the feasibility, efficacy and specificity of the anti-AP-1 dODN approach to the treatment of restenosis, which principally but not exclusively targets deformation-induced ET-1 synthesis in the vessel wall. Provided that these findings can be extrapolated to the situation of patients with coronary artery disease, the observed extent of the inhibitory effect of the AP-1 dODN treatment suggests that this co-medication may greatly reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis.

[1]  J. Moses,et al.  Efficacy of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in small coronary arteries. Stent Restenosis Study (STRESS) Investigators. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  J. Isner,et al.  Histopathology of in-stent restenosis in patients with peripheral artery disease. , 1997, Circulation.

[3]  A. Buchwald,et al.  Reduced acute thrombus formation results in decreased neointimal proliferation after coronary angioplasty. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  W. Edwards,et al.  Mechanical pressure and stretch release endothelin-1 from human atherosclerotic coronary arteries in vivo. , 1997, Circulation.

[5]  R. Schwartz,et al.  Selective ET(A) receptor antagonism reduces neointimal hyperplasia in a porcine coronary stent model. , 1998, Circulation.

[6]  M. Hecker,et al.  Transcriptional control of deformation-induced preproendothelin-1 gene expression in endothelial cells , 2000, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[7]  R E Vlietstra,et al.  Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  P. Teirstein,et al.  A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Current Era Compared With 1985–1986: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Registries , 2000, Circulation.

[10]  W Rutsch,et al.  A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  M. Leon,et al.  Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis. A serial intravascular ultrasound study. , 1996, Circulation.

[12]  M. Hecker,et al.  Elevated perfusion pressure upregulates endothelin-1 and endothelin B receptor expression in the rabbit carotid artery. , 2000, Hypertension.

[13]  C. Wegner,et al.  Selective antagonism of the ET(A) receptor reduces neointimal hyperplasia after balloon-induced vascular injury in pigs. , 1997, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology.

[14]  J. D. Elliott,et al.  A role for endogenous endothelin-1 in neointimal formation after rat carotid artery balloon angioplasty. Protective effects of the novel nonpeptide endothelin receptor antagonist SB 209670. , 1994, Circulation research.

[15]  K. Robinson,et al.  Coronary intimal proliferation after balloon injury and stenting in swine: an animal model of restenosis. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  A. Buchwald,et al.  Low‐Molecular‐Weight Heparin Reduces Neointimal Proliferation After Coronary Stent Implantation in Hypercholesterolemic Minipigs , 1992, Circulation.