Effects of rotational capacity and horizontal restraint on development of catenary action in 2-D RC frames

Abstract Research studies on 2-D reinforced concrete (RC) beams under middle column removal scenarios have found that catenary action (CA) can significantly increase structural resistance and deflection beyond flexural capacity. However, development of CA is highly dependent on the rotational capacity of RC beams and the degree of horizontal restraints from adjacent structures. Previous studies have identified the effect of varying beam details, (such as geometry and reinforcement ratio) on CA, but very few publications focused on the beneficial effect of rotational capacity on CA. To the authors’ best knowledge, there has not been any publication on quantifying the effect of rotational capacity on CA. Moreover, experimental studies of CA have so far been conducted on RC beams with full restraints at the two supporting ends. Hence, in this study, five RC frame specimens were tested to study the effects of rotational capacity and degree of horizontal restraint on CA. One frame served as a control specimen, two specimens for improvement in rotational capacity, and another two with inadequate horizontal restraint. Improvement in rotational capacity was engineered in one frame through provision of closer-spaced stirrups near to the joints and another frame through substitution of deformed bars with smooth round bars. Adverse effect of inadequate horizontal restraint was investigated under penultimate column removal scenarios. Through the testing and analysis of the five frames, the effects of improvement in rotational capacity and inadequate horizontal restraint on CA could be quantified and discussed. Finally, practical suggestions on enhancing CA through detailing were provided.

[1]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Experimental Study on Progressive Collapse-Resistant Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures , 2008 .

[2]  Shao-Bo Kang,et al.  Progressive Collapse Resistance of Precast Concrete Frames with Discontinuous Reinforcement in the Joint , 2017 .

[3]  Kang Hai Tan,et al.  Damage assessment for reinforced concrete frames subject to progressive collapse , 2017 .

[4]  Mehrdad Sasani,et al.  Progressive collapse analysis of an RC structure , 2008 .

[5]  Jun Yu,et al.  Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Frames Subjected to Progressive Collapse , 2017 .

[6]  R. Park.  Tensile membrane behaviour of uniformly loaded rectangular reinforced concrete slabs with fully restrained edges , 1964 .

[7]  Kai Qian.  Experimental and analytical study of reinforced concrete substructures subjected to a loss of ground corner column scenario , 2012 .

[8]  Kang Hai Tan,et al.  Structural Behavior of RC Beam-Column Subassemblages under a Middle Column Removal Scenario , 2013 .

[9]  Kang Hai Tan,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation on progressive collapse resistance of reinforced concrete beam column sub-assemblages , 2013 .

[10]  Kang Hai Tan,et al.  Special Detailing Techniques to Improve Structural Resistance against Progressive Collapse , 2014 .

[11]  Eric B. Williamson,et al.  DoD Research and Criteria for the Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse , 2011 .

[12]  Youpo Su,et al.  Progressive Collapse Resistance of Axially-Restrained Frame Beams , 2009 .

[13]  Colin Bailey,et al.  Simplified and Advanced Analysis of Membrane Action of Concrete Slabs , 2008 .

[14]  Fahim Sadek,et al.  Testing and Analysis of Steel and Concrete Beam-Column Assemblies under a Column Removal Scenario , 2011 .

[15]  Kang Hai Tan,et al.  Modeling progressive collapse of 2D reinforced concrete frames subject to column removal scenario , 2017 .

[16]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  Progressive collapse-resisting capacity of RC beam–column sub-assemblage , 2011 .

[17]  A W Beeby,et al.  CONCISE EUROCODE FOR THE DESIGN OF CONCRETE BUILDINGS. BASED ON BSI PUBLICATION DD ENV 1992-1-1: 1992. EUROCODE 2: DESIGN OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES. PART 1: GENERAL RULES AND RULES FOR BUILDINGS , 1993 .