How Synchronization Protects from Noise

The functional role of synchronization has attracted much interest and debate: in particular, synchronization may allow distant sites in the brain to communicate and cooperate with each other, and therefore may play a role in temporal binding, in attention or in sensory-motor integration mechanisms. In this article, we study another role for synchronization: the so-called “collective enhancement of precision”. We argue, in a full nonlinear dynamical context, that synchronization may help protect interconnected neurons from the influence of random perturbations—intrinsic neuronal noise—which affect all neurons in the nervous system. More precisely, our main contribution is a mathematical proof that, under specific, quantified conditions, the impact of noise on individual interconnected systems and on their spatial mean can essentially be cancelled through synchronization. This property then allows reliable computations to be carried out even in the presence of significant noise (as experimentally found e.g., in retinal ganglion cells in primates). This in turn is key to obtaining meaningful downstream signals, whether in terms of precisely-timed interaction (temporal coding), population coding, or frequency coding. Similar concepts may be applicable to questions of noise and variability in systems biology.

[1]  L. Pinneo On noise in the nervous system. , 1966, Psychological review.

[2]  Arthur Gelb,et al.  Applied Optimal Estimation , 1974 .

[3]  R. Dehaan,et al.  Fluctuations in interbeat interval in rhythmic heart-cell clusters. Role of membrane voltage noise. , 1979, Biophysical journal.

[4]  A. Winfree The geometry of biological time , 1991 .

[5]  J. T. Enright Temporal precision in circadian systems: a reliable neuronal clock from unreliable components? , 1980, Science.

[6]  M. Alexander,et al.  Principles of Neural Science , 1981 .

[7]  J. Rinzel,et al.  Emergence of organized bursting in clusters of pancreatic beta-cells by channel sharing. , 1988, Biophysical journal.

[8]  J. Rinzel,et al.  Model for synchronization of pancreatic beta-cells by gap junction coupling. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[9]  K. Purpura,et al.  Response variability in retinal ganglion cells of primates. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  W. Singer Synchronization of cortical activity and its putative role in information processing and learning. , 1993, Annual review of physiology.

[11]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Reliability of spike timing in neocortical neurons. , 1995, Science.

[12]  O. Prospero-Garcia,et al.  Reliability of Spike Timing in Neocortical Neurons , 1995 .

[13]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  On Contraction Analysis for Non-linear Systems , 1998, Autom..

[14]  T. A. Kinard,et al.  Modulation of the bursting properties of single mouse pancreatic beta-cells by artificial conductances. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[15]  S. Grossberg The complementary brain: unifying brain dynamics and modularity , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Desmond J. Higham,et al.  An Algorithmic Introduction to Numerical Simulation of Stochastic Differential Equations , 2001, SIAM Rev..

[17]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[18]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Collective enhancement of precision in networks of coupled oscillators , 2001 .

[19]  W. Singer,et al.  Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  S. Strogatz Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[21]  Y. Kuramoto,et al.  Strong desynchronizing effects of weak noise in globally coupled systems. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Spiking Neuron Models , 2002 .

[23]  Bijan Pesaran,et al.  Temporal structure in neuronal activity during working memory in macaque parietal cortex , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  J. Teramae,et al.  Robustness of the noise-induced phase synchronization in a general class of limit cycle oscillators. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[25]  Henry C. Tuckwell,et al.  Analytical and Simulation Results for Stochastic Fitzhugh-Nagumo Neurons and Neural Networks , 1998, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[26]  Chris Eliasmith,et al.  Neural Engineering: Computation, Representation, and Dynamics in Neurobiological Systems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[27]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  On partial contraction analysis for coupled nonlinear oscillators , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Which model to use for cortical spiking neurons? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[29]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Modeling a synthetic multicellular clock: repressilators coupled by quorum sensing. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  C. Koch,et al.  What is the function of the claustrum? , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  B. Bassler,et al.  Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. , 2005, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[32]  S. Hestrin,et al.  Electrical synapses define networks of neocortical GABAergic neurons , 2005, Trends in Neurosciences.

[33]  Uri Alon,et al.  An Introduction to Systems Biology , 2006 .

[34]  G. Buzsáki Rhythms of the brain , 2006 .

[35]  W. Singer,et al.  Gap Junctions among Dendrites of Cortical GABAergic Neurons Establish a Dense and Widespread Intercolumnar Network , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  M. Berger,et al.  High Gamma Power Is Phase-Locked to Theta Oscillations in Human Neocortex , 2006, Science.

[37]  N. Barkai,et al.  Variability and robustness in biomolecular systems. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[38]  W. Singer,et al.  Modulation of Neuronal Interactions Through Neuronal Synchronization , 2007, Science.

[39]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  Stable concurrent synchronization in dynamic system networks , 2005, Neural Networks.

[40]  Rajan P Kulkarni,et al.  Tunability and Noise Dependence in Differentiation Dynamics , 2007, Science.

[41]  J. Palva,et al.  New vistas for α-frequency band oscillations , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[42]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  The role of neuronal synchronization in selective attention , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[43]  J. Palva,et al.  New vistas for alpha-frequency band oscillations. , 2007, Trends in neurosciences.

[44]  G. Ermentrout,et al.  Reliability, synchrony and noise , 2008, Trends in Neurosciences.

[45]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Regulation of spike timing in visual cortical circuits , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[46]  Adam G. Hendricks,et al.  Collective dynamics of kinesin. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[47]  K. Showalter,et al.  Dynamical Quorum Sensing and Synchronization in Large Populations of Chemical Oscillators , 2009, Science.

[48]  Pierre Yger,et al.  Network-State Modulation of Power-Law Frequency-Scaling in Visual Cortical Neurons , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[49]  R. Desimone,et al.  High-Frequency, Long-Range Coupling Between Prefrontal and Visual Cortex During Attention , 2009, Science.

[50]  Nicolas Tabareau,et al.  A Contraction Theory Approach to Stochastic Incremental Stability , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.