Comparing Power-System and User-Oriented Battery Electric Vehicle Charging Representation and Its Implications on Energy System Modeling

Battery electric vehicles (BEV) provide an opportunity to balance supply and demand in future power systems with high shares of fluctuating renewable energy. Compared to other storage systems such as pumped-storage hydroelectricity, electric vehicle energy demand is highly dependent on charging and connection choices of vehicle users. We present a model framework of a utility-based stock and flow model, a utility-based microsimulation of charging decisions, and an energy system model including respective interfaces to assess how the representation of battery electric vehicle charging affects energy system optimization results. We then apply the framework to a scenario study for controlled charging of nine million electric vehicles in Germany in 2030. Assuming a respective fleet power demand of 27 TWh, we analyze the difference between power-system-based and vehicle user-based charging decisions in two respective scenarios. Our results show that taking into account vehicle users’ charging and connection decisions significantly decreases the load shifting potential of controlled charging. The analysis of marginal values of equations and variables of the optimization problem yields valuable insights on the importance of specific constraints and optimization variables. Assumptions on fleet battery availability and a detailed representation of fast charging are found to have a strong impact on wind curtailment, renewable energy feed-in, and required gas power plant flexibility. A representation of fleet connection to the grid in high temporal detail is less important. Peak load can be reduced by 5% and 3% in both scenarios, respectively. Shifted load is robust across sensitivity analyses while other model results such as curtailment are more sensitive to factors such as underlying data years. Analyzing the importance of increased BEV fleet battery availability for power systems with different weather and electricity demand characteristics should be further scrutinized.

[1]  Baozhen Yao,et al.  The location optimization of electric vehicle charging stations considering charging behavior , 2018, Simul..

[2]  R. Pietzcker,et al.  Application of a high-detail energy system model to derive power sector characteristics at high wind and solar shares , 2017 .

[3]  James Francfort,et al.  Analysing the usage and evidencing the importance of fast chargers for the adoption of battery electric vehicles , 2017 .

[4]  Sonja Simon,et al.  100% Renewable Energy Supply for Brazil—The Role of Sector Coupling and Regional Development , 2017 .

[5]  Toshiyuki Yamamoto,et al.  Charge timing choice behavior of battery electric vehicle users , 2015 .

[6]  T. Gnann,et al.  Load Shifting Potentials of Plug-In Electric Vehicles—A Case Study for Germany , 2018, World Electric Vehicle Journal.

[7]  Arne Surmann,et al.  Electric vehicles’ impacts on residential electric local profiles – A stochastic modelling approach considering socio-economic, behavioural and spatial factors , 2019, Applied Energy.

[8]  Zhenhong Lin,et al.  Modeling charging behavior of battery electric vehicle drivers: A cumulative prospect theory based approach , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[9]  F. Sprei,et al.  A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure , 2018, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[10]  Thomas Hamacher,et al.  Integration of wind and solar power in Europe: Assessment of flexibility requirements , 2014 .

[11]  S. Simon,et al.  Carbon neutral archipelago – 100% renewable energy supply for the Canary Islands , 2017 .

[12]  T. Pregger,et al.  Impact of electric vehicles on a future renewable energy‐based power system in Europe with a focus on Germany , 2018 .

[13]  Diego Luca de Tena,et al.  Integrated modelling of variable renewable energy-based power supply in Europe , 2017 .

[14]  M. Kroesen,et al.  Policy effects on charging behaviour of electric vehicle owners and on purchase intentions of prospective owners: Natural and stated choice experiments , 2018, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[15]  Wolf Fichtner,et al.  Electricity storage systems in the future German energy sector: An optimization of the German electricity generation system until 2040 considering grid restrictions , 2016, Comput. Oper. Res..

[16]  Thomas Pregger,et al.  Analyse von Strukturoptionen zur Integration erneuerbarer Energien in Deutschland und Europa unter Berücksichtigung der Versorgungssicherheit (INTEEVER) , 2019 .

[17]  S. Funke,et al.  Fast charging infrastructure for electric vehicles: Today’s situation and future needs , 2018, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[18]  D. S. Bunch,et al.  Demand drivers for charging infrastructure-charging behavior of plug-in electric vehicle commuters , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[19]  Sonia Yeh,et al.  Integration of behavioral effects from vehicle choice models into long-term energy systems optimization models , 2018, Energy Economics.

[20]  Wolf Fichtner,et al.  Load shift potential of electric vehicles in Europe , 2014 .

[21]  T. Brown,et al.  Synergies of sector coupling and transmission reinforcement in a cost-optimised, highly renewable European energy system , 2018, Energy.

[22]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Anticipating PEV buyers’ acceptance of utility controlled charging , 2015 .

[23]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Linking the Power and Transport Sectors—Part 2: Modelling a Sector Coupling Scenario for Germany , 2017 .

[24]  F. Johnsson,et al.  Impacts of electric vehicles on the electricity generation portfolio – A Scandinavian-German case study , 2019, Applied Energy.