Structured Under‐Specification of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Data for Building Assemblies

The existence of uncertainties and variations in data represents a remaining challenge for life cycle assessment (LCA). Moreover, a full analysis may be complex, time‐consuming, and implemented mainly when a product design is already defined. Structured under‐specification, a method developed to streamline LCA, is here proposed to support the residential building design process, by quantifying environmental impact when specific information on the system under analysis cannot be available. By means of structured classifications of materials and building assemblies, it is possible to use surrogate data during the life cycle inventory phase and thus to obtain environmental impact and associated uncertainty. The bill of materials of a building assembly can be specified using minimal detail during the design process. The low‐fidelity characterization of a building assembly and the uncertainty associated with these low levels of fidelity are systematically quantified through structured under‐specification using a structured classification of materials. The analyst is able to use this classification to quantify uncertainty in results at each level of specificity. Concerning building assemblies, an average decrease of uncertainty of 25% is observed at each additional level of specificity within the data structure. This approach was used to compare different exterior wall options during the early design process. Almost 50% of the comparisons can be statistically differentiated at even the lowest level of specificity. This data structure is the foundation of a streamlined approach that can be applied not only when a complete bill of materials is available, but also when fewer details are known.

[1]  Sam Debaveye,et al.  Environmental sustainability assessments of pharmaceuticals: an emerging need for simplification in life cycle assessments. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Matthias Schulz,et al.  A streamlined sustainability assessment tool for improved decision making in the urban water industry , 2012, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[3]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Data quality management for life cycle inventories—an example of using data quality indicators☆ , 1996 .

[4]  Ignacio Zabalza,et al.  Life cycle assessment in buildings: The ENSLIC simplified method and guidelines , 2011 .

[5]  Serenella Sala,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of normalization factors to methodological assumptions , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[6]  Johan Braet,et al.  Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review , 2013 .

[7]  P. Christensen,et al.  Impacts of “metals” on human health: a comparison between nine different methodologies for Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) , 2011 .

[8]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[9]  R. Alvarenga,et al.  Evaluation of Abiotic Resource LCIA Methods , 2016 .

[10]  Bernardette Soust-Verdaguer,et al.  Critical review of bim-based LCA method to buildings , 2017 .

[11]  Bernardette Soust-Verdaguer,et al.  Simplification in life cycle assessment of single-family houses: A review of recent developments , 2016 .

[12]  Bernhard Steubing,et al.  Streamlining scenario analysis and optimization of key choices in value chains using a modular LCA approach , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[13]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Giving a scientific basis for uncertainty factors used in global life cycle inventory databases: an algorithm to update factors using new information , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[14]  Lukumon O. Oyedele,et al.  Lifecycle Environmental Performance of Materials Specifications: A BIM Enhanced Comparative Assessment , 2021 .

[15]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[16]  Oscar Ortiz,et al.  Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA , 2009 .

[17]  Michael D. Lepech,et al.  A multi-objective feedback approach for evaluating sequential conceptual building design decisions , 2014 .

[18]  Matthias Haase,et al.  A zero emission concept analysis of a single family house , 2014 .

[19]  Ben Amor,et al.  Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review , 2017 .

[20]  Ignacio Zabalza Bribián,et al.  Life cycle assessment in buildings: State-of-the-art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification , 2009 .

[21]  Paolo Tecchio,et al.  Ex-ante Life Cycle Assessment approach developed for a case study on bio-based polybutylene succinate , 2016 .

[22]  Susanna Horn,et al.  Evaluating the Sustainability SWOT as a streamlined tool for life cycle sustainability assessment , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[23]  P. Rousseeuw,et al.  Alternatives to the Median Absolute Deviation , 1993 .

[24]  Grzegorz Pajchrowski,et al.  Between full LCA and energy certification methodology—a comparison of six methodological variants of buildings environmental assessment , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[25]  Thomas Gloria,et al.  Development of the method and U.S. normalization database for Life Cycle Impact Assessment and sustainability metrics. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  Christopher R. Iddon,et al.  Embodied and operational energy for new-build housing: A case study of construction methods in the UK , 2013 .

[27]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review , 2014 .

[28]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and Regression Tree Methods , 2008 .

[29]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Comparative pavement life cycle assessment with parameter uncertainty , 2013 .

[30]  Seongwon Seo,et al.  Automated Material Selection and Environmental Assessment in the Context of 3D Building Modelling , 2007 .

[31]  Mary Ann Curran,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment: a review of the methodology and its application to sustainability , 2013 .

[32]  Appu Haapio,et al.  A critical review of building environmental assessment tools , 2008 .

[33]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Evaluation of two simplified Life Cycle assessment methods , 2003 .

[34]  J. B. Andrade,et al.  Early Stage Design Decisions: The Way to Achieve Sustainable Buildings at Lower Costs , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[35]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  Relevance of simplifications in LCA of building components , 2009 .

[36]  Michael D. Lepech,et al.  Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts , 2013 .

[37]  Weimin Wang,et al.  Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green building design optimization , 2005 .

[38]  R. Kleijn,et al.  Numerical approaches towards life cycle interpretation five examples , 2001 .

[39]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  The ecoinvent Database: Overview and Methodological Framework (7 pp) , 2005 .

[40]  Violeta Motuzienė,et al.  Construction solutions for energy efficient single-family house based on its life cycle multi-criteria analysis: a case study , 2016 .

[41]  Rokia Raslan,et al.  Variations in results of building energy simulation tools, and their impact on BREEAM and LEED ratings: A case study , 2013 .

[42]  Dominique Guyonnet,et al.  Quantifying uncertainty in LCA-modelling of waste management systems. , 2012, Waste management.

[43]  Alexander Hollberg,et al.  LCA in architectural design—a parametric approach , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[44]  Alex K. Jones,et al.  Life cycle assessment use in the North American building community: summary of findings from a 2011/2012 survey , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[45]  D. Tonini,et al.  Stochastic and epistemic uncertainty propagation in LCA , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[46]  Gabriela Benveniste,et al.  Simplified tools for global warming potential evaluation: when ‘good enough’ is best , 2010 .

[47]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  Evaluating the sustainability of electronic media: Strategies for life cycle inventory data collection and their implications for LCA results , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[48]  Gillian Frances Menzies,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: A Review , 2009 .

[49]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Exploring the viability of probabilistic under-specification to streamline life cycle assessment. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[50]  Keith Weitz,et al.  Case studies examining LCA streamlining techniques , 1998 .

[51]  Michael D. Lepech,et al.  Multi-objective building envelope optimization for life-cycle cost and global warming potential , 2012 .

[52]  Gian Andrea Blengini,et al.  Energy-saving policies and low-energy residential buildings: an LCA case study to support decision makers in Piedmont (Italy) , 2010 .

[53]  York Ostermeyer,et al.  Environmental Impact of Buildings--What Matters? , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[54]  A. L. Koch,et al.  The logarithm in biology. 1. Mechanisms generating the log-normal distribution exactly. , 1966, Journal of theoretical biology.