Reducing Variability to Improve Performance as a Lean Construction Principle

Variability is common on construction projects and must be managed effectively. New management thinking, like that of lean production, has suggested that better labor and cost performance can be achieved by reducing output variability. Efforts to utilize lean thinking in construction, so far, have generated limited evidence to support this claim. This paper investigates the relationship between variability and project performance to test the notion that reducing output variability will result in improved labor performance. Using productivity data from concrete formwork activities on multiple projects, various measures of output variability are tested against construction performance. It is shown that variability in output is inevitable and that there is little correlation between output variability and project performance, but that variability in labor productivity is closely correlated to project performance. It is concluded that lean improvement initiatives should be redirected to adaptable workforce management capabilities to reduce variability in labor productivity instead of output in order to improve project performance.

[1]  Michael J Horman Process dynamics : buffer management in building project operations , 2000 .

[2]  H. Randolph Thomas Labor Productivity and Work Sampling: The Bottom Line , 1991 .

[3]  Glenn Ballard,et al.  Implementing lean construction: Reducing inflow variation , 1997 .

[4]  V. K. Handa,et al.  Downgrading Construction Incidents , 1983 .

[5]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  Toward construction JIT , 1997 .

[6]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  Pull-Driven Scheduling for Pipe-Spool Installation: Simulation of Lean Construction Technique , 1998 .

[7]  James P. Womack,et al.  Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation , 1996 .

[8]  B. T. Talhouni,et al.  Effects of Accelerated Working, Delays and Distruption on Labour Productivity , 1996 .

[9]  H. Randolph Thomas,et al.  Impact of Material Management on Productivity—A Case Study , 1989 .

[10]  H R Thomas,et al.  LOSS OF CONSTRUCTION LABOR PRODUCTIVITY DUE TO INEFFICIENCIES AND DISRUPTIONS: THE WEIGHT OF EXPERT OPINION , 1990 .

[11]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  SHIELDING PRODUCTION: ESSENTIAL STEP IN PRODUCTION CONTROL , 1998 .

[12]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Factory physics : foundations of manufacturing management , 1996 .

[13]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction , 1992 .

[14]  David R. Riley,et al.  Loss of Labor Productivity due to Delivery Methods and Weather , 1999 .

[15]  H. Randolph Thomas,et al.  Role of the Fabricator in Labor Productivity , 2000 .

[16]  R. Malcolm W. Horner,et al.  Modeling Construction Labor Productivity , 1990 .

[17]  R. Kenley,et al.  Process Dynamics: Identifying a Strategy for the Deployment of Buffers in Building Projects , 1998 .

[18]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  Toyota Production System : Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .

[19]  Greg Howell,et al.  Implementing Lean Construction: Stabilizing Work Flow , 1997 .

[20]  Ivica Završki,et al.  Construction baseline productivity: Theory and practice , 1999 .

[21]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  PARADE GAME :I MPACT OF WORK FLOW VARIABILITY ON TRADE PERFORMANCE , 1999 .

[22]  H. Randolph Thomas,et al.  Factors Affecting Masonry‐Labor Productivity , 1991 .

[23]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  Interaction between subcycles: one key to improved methods , 1993 .

[24]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Toyota Production System , 1993 .