The effect of enamel matrix proteins and deproteinized bovine bone mineral on heterotopic bone formation.

To evaluate the osteoinductive potential of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and an enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in the muscle of rats. Sixteen rats were used in this study. The animals were divided in three groups. Group A: a pouch was created in one of the pectoralis profundis muscles of the thorax of the rats and DBBM particles (Bio-Oss) were placed into the pouch. Healing: 60 days. Group B: a small pouch was created on both pectoralis profundis muscles at each side of the thorax midline. In one side, a mixture of EMD (Emdogain) mixed with DBBM was placed into one of the pouches, whereas in the contralateral side of the thorax the pouch was implanted with DBBM mixed with the propylene glycol alginate (PGA--carrier for enamel matrix proteins of EMD). Healing: 60 days. Group C: the same procedure as group B, but with a healing period of 120 days. Qualitative histological analysis of the results was performed. At 60 days, the histological appearance of the DBBM particles implanted alone was similar to that of the particles implanted together with EMD or PGA at both 60 and 120 days. The DBBM particles were encapsulated into a connective tissue stroma and an inflammatory infiltrate. At 120 days, the DBBM particles implanted together with EMD or PGA exhibited the presence of resorption lacunae in some cases. Intramuscular bone formation was not encountered in any group. The implantation of DBBM particles alone, combined with EMD or its carrier (PGA) failed to exhibit extraskeletal, bone-inductive properties.

[1]  N. Lang,et al.  Bone formation by enamel matrix proteins and xenografts: an experimental study in the rat ramus. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[2]  N. Lang,et al.  Effect of GBR in combination with deproteinized bovine bone mineral and/or enamel matrix proteins on the healing of critical-size defects. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[3]  T. Karring,et al.  Wound healing of degree III furcation involvements following guided tissue regeneration and/or Emdogain. A histologic study. , 2003, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[4]  R. Jung,et al.  Effect of rhBMP-2 on guided bone regeneration in humans. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[5]  A. Veis,et al.  Amelogenin gene splice products: potential signaling molecules , 2003, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[6]  Fumi Kawana,et al.  Effects of enamel matrix derivative on mineralized tissue formation during bone wound healing in rat parietal bone defects. , 2002, Journal of electron microscopy.

[7]  K. Debari,et al.  Effects of enamel matrix derivative to titanium implantation in rat femurs. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[8]  K. Healy,et al.  Specific Amelogenin Gene Splice Products Have Signaling Effects on Cells in Culture and in Implants in Vivo * , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  D. Carnes,et al.  Porcine fetal enamel matrix derivative stimulates proliferation but not differentiation of pre-osteoblastic 2T9 cells, inhibits proliferation and stimulates differentiation of osteoblast-like MG63 cells, and increases proliferation and differentiation of normal human osteoblast NHOst cells. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[10]  D. Carnes,et al.  Porcine fetal enamel matrix derivative enhances bone formation induced by demineralized freeze dried bone allograft in vivo. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[11]  D. Cochran,et al.  In vitro wound healing responses to enamel matrix derivative. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[12]  T. Karring,et al.  Treatment of intrabony defects with guided tissue regeneration and enamel-matrix-proteins. An experimental study in monkeys. , 2000, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[13]  H. Inoue,et al.  Identification of the Chondrogenic-inducing Activity from Bovine Dentin (bCIA) as a Low-molecular-mass Amelogenin Polypeptide , 1999, Journal of dental research.

[14]  T. Karring,et al.  Healing of human intrabony defects following treatment with enamel matrix proteins or guided tissue regeneration. , 1999, Journal of periodontal research.

[15]  N. Lang,et al.  The effect of a deproteinized bovine bone mineral on bone regeneration around titanium dental implants. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[16]  A. Brodin,et al.  Formulation of enamel matrix derivative for surface coating. Kinetics and cell colonization. , 1997, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[17]  L. Hammarström Enamel matrix, cementum development and regeneration. , 1997, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[18]  D. Carnes,et al.  Ability of commercial demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft to induce new bone formation. , 1996, Journal of periodontology.

[19]  H. Haanaes,et al.  Alveolar ridge augmentation in rats by Bio-Oss. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[20]  V. Rosen,et al.  Novel regulators of bone formation: molecular clones and activities. , 1988, Science.

[21]  M. Urist,et al.  Bone: Formation by Autoinduction , 1965, Science.