What levels of precision are achievable for quantification of perfusion and capillary permeability surface area product using ASL?

We examine the use of arterial spin labeling (ASL) in normal brains of rats and humans to measure perfusion (F) and capillary permeability surface area product (PS) using a previously described two‐compartment model. We investigate the experimental limits on F and PS quantification using simulations and experimental verification in rat brain at 9.4T. A sensitivity analysis on the two‐compartment model is presented to estimate optimal experimental inversion times (TIs) for F and PS quantification and indicate how sensitive the model would be to changes in F and PS. We present the expected error on flow‐sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR)‐based F and PS measurements and quantify the precision with which these parameters could be estimated at various signal‐to‐noise ratios (SNRs). Perfusion was measured in four rat brains using FAIR ASL, and we conclude that perfusion could be quantified with an acceptable level of precision using this technique. However, we found that to measure PS with even a 100% coefficient of variation (CV) would require an SNR increase of approximately 2 orders of magnitude over our acquired data. We conclude that with current MR capabilities and with the experimental approach used in this study, acceptable levels of precision in the measurement of PS are not possible. Magn Reson Med 58:281–289, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  J. Ewing,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion in rat cerebral 9L tumor after nicotinamide administration. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Ling Wei,et al.  Direct Comparison of Local Cerebral Blood Flow Rates Measured by MRI Arterial Spin-Tagging and Quantitative Autoradiography in a Rat Model of Experimental Cerebral Ischemia , 2003, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[3]  T. L. Davis,et al.  Mr perfusion studies with t1‐weighted echo planar imaging , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  R. Ordidge,et al.  TurboFLASH FAIR imaging with optimized inversion and imaging profiles , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  M. Garwood,et al.  Imaging blood flow in brain tumors using arterial spin labeling , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Donald S. Williams,et al.  Estimation of water extraction fractions in rat brain using magnetic resonance measurement of perfusion with arterial spin labeling , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Jan M Warnking,et al.  Bandwidth‐modulated adiabatic RF pulses for uniform selective saturation and inversion , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  S Warach,et al.  A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Seong-Gi Kim Quantification of relative cerebral blood flow change by flow‐sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: Application to functional mapping , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  B R Rosen,et al.  Improving MR quantification of regional blood volume with intravascular T1 contrast agents: Accuracy, precision, and water exchange , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  W J Manning,et al.  Studies of Gd‐DTPA relaxivity and proton exchange rates in tissue , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  M. Garwood,et al.  Improved subtraction by adiabatic FAIR perfusion imaging , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Seong-Gi Kim,et al.  Comparison of diffusion‐weighted high‐resolution CBF and spin‐echo BOLD fMRI at 9.4 T , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Inversion profiles of adiabatic inversion pulses for flowing spins: the effects on labeling efficiency and labeling accuracy in perfusion imaging with pulsed arterial spin-labeling. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  Norbert Schuff,et al.  Four‐phase single‐capillary stepwise model for kinetics in arterial spin labeling MRI , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  T S Koh,et al.  The inclusion of capillary distribution in the adiabatic tissue homogeneity model of blood flow. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Yihong Yang,et al.  Multislice perfusion imaging in human brain using the C‐FOCI inversion pulse: Comparison with hyperbolic secant , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  J. Knight‐Scott,et al.  Theoretical analysis of the effect of imperfect slice profiles on tagging schemes for pulsed arterial spin labeling MRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  R B Buxton,et al.  A theoretical and experimental comparison of continuous and pulsed arterial spin labeling techniques for quantitative perfusion imaging , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  J. Ulatowski,et al.  Two-Compartment Exchange Model for Perfusion Quantification Using Arterial Spin Tagging , 2001, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[21]  S B Reeder,et al.  Effects of water exchange on the measurement of myocardial perfusion using paramagnetic contrast agents , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  D. Burstein,et al.  Perfusion MRI of U87 brain tumors in a mouse model , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  R J Ordidge,et al.  Simultaneous noninvasive measurement of CBF and CBV using double‐echo FAIR (DEFAIR) , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Laura M Parkes,et al.  Improved accuracy of human cerebral blood perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling: Accounting for capillary water permeability , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  Xavier Golay,et al.  Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 Tesla , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  C. Zimmer,et al.  Quantification of blood flow in brain tumors: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 2003, Radiology.

[27]  Daniel E. Hall,et al.  Continuous arterial spin labeling using a train of adiabatic inversion pulses , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  Yue Cao,et al.  Single‐coil arterial spin‐tagging for estimating cerebral blood flow as viewed from the capillary: Relative contributions of intra‐ and extravascular signal , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Donald S. Williams,et al.  Evidence for the exchange of arterial spin‐labeled water with tissue water in rat brain from diffusion‐sensitized measurements of perfusion , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  G. Pell,et al.  Pulsed arterial spin labeling using TurboFLASH with suppression of intravascular signal , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  Donald S. Williams,et al.  Tissue specific perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling , 1994, NMR in biomedicine.

[32]  P. Tofts,et al.  Normal cerebral perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling: Reproducibility, stability, and age and gender effects , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  Hellmut Merkle,et al.  Quantitative measurements of cerebral blood flow in rats using the FAIR technique: Correlation with previous lodoantipyrine autoradiographic studies , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  J A Frank,et al.  Effect of restricted water exchange on cerebral blood flow values calculated with arterial spin tagging: A theoretical investigation , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  Roger J Ordidge,et al.  Comparative Study of the FAIR Technique of Perfusion Quantification with the Hydrogen Clearance Method , 2003, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[36]  P. V. van Zijl,et al.  FAIR excluding radiation damping (FAIRER) , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  Donald S. Williams,et al.  Perfusion imaging , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  Matthias Günther,et al.  Comparison of Arterial Spin-Labeling Techniques and Dynamic Susceptibility-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Perfusion Imaging of Normal Brain Tissue , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[39]  D G Gadian,et al.  Implementation of quantitative FAIR perfusion imaging with a short repetition time in time‐course studies , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.