The Development of Questions to Determine the Effectiveness of the Incident Investigation Process for Electrical Incidents

Electrical incidents occur globally, providing valuable opportunities for practical-knowledge-based learning and improvements. The underlying root causes of an incident are not always apparent, and an incident investigation method or a loss causation model is required to analyze the facts gathered from an incident. It is important that an incident investigation is effectively executed in order to add value. An ineffective investigation may lead to recurrent incidents and the wastage of resources. Investigators performing an incident investigation can be biased and subjective. Incident investigation methods can be also subjective. Adequately resolving root causes is another subjective area. In order to mitigate subjectivity and biases, various models such as the cause and effect diagram, the five whys method, the sequential cause analysis technique, the management oversight and risk tree, effects and causal factor charting, change analysis, barrier analysis, and casual factor analysis are examined. This aims to improve knowledge on the application of a technique and to establish a review method to determine the effectiveness of an incident investigation process. The review method consists of the development of survey-type questions that can be applied to industry, and this serves as the aim of this research paper.

[1]  Saeed Shoar,et al.  Electrical injury in construction workers: a special focus on injury with electrical power. , 2014, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[2]  工業講話会 安全装置工業事故豫防法 = Industrial accident prevention , 1918 .

[3]  Paul Amyotte,et al.  Application of a Loss Causation Model to the Westray Mine Explosion , 2002 .

[4]  J.C. Cawley Electrical accidents in the mining industry, 1990-1999 , 2001, Conference Record of the 2001 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. 36th IAS Annual Meeting (Cat. No.01CH37248).

[5]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Models of accident causation and their application: Review and reappraisal , 1991 .

[6]  J. Reason Human error: models and management , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  J. C. Cawley Electrical accidents in the mining industry, 1990-1999 , 2001 .

[8]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem , 1997 .

[9]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Evaluating Accident Models Using Recent Aerospace Accidents, Part 1: Event-Based Models , 2001 .

[10]  Yang Miang Goh,et al.  Incident Causation Model for Improving Feedback of Safety Knowledge , 2004 .

[11]  Carol Boraiko,et al.  Accident Investigations One Element of an Effective Safety Culture , 2008 .

[12]  George R. Kim,et al.  ReCASTing the RCA: An Improved Model for Performing Root Cause Analyses , 2010, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[13]  E. Hollnagel,et al.  What-You-Look-For-Is-What-You-Find - The consequences of underlying accident models in eight accident investigation manuals , 2009 .

[14]  H.L. Floyd Escaping arc danger , 2008, IEEE Industry Applications Magazine.

[15]  Snorre Sklet,et al.  Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[16]  James I. McManus,et al.  Handbook of Software Quality Assurance , 1987 .

[17]  Ted S. Ferry Management Oversight and Risk Tree (MORT) , 2007 .

[18]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[19]  James I. McManus,et al.  Handbook of software quality assurance (3rd ed.) , 1998 .

[20]  Charles R. McClure,et al.  Encyclopedia of occupational health and safety: Third Edition, 2 Volumes Geneva: International Labour Office, 1983, 2538 pages, $155.00. ISBN 92-2-103291-4 , 1985 .

[21]  S. Mashreky,et al.  Consequences of non-fatal electrical injury: findings of community-based national survey in Bangladesh. , 2012, Injury.

[22]  Joseph H. Saleh,et al.  From learning from accidents to teaching about accident causation and prevention: Multidisciplinary education and safety literacy for all engineering students , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Michael P. Broadribb It's people, stupid!: Human factors in incident investigation , 2012 .

[24]  K. Ishikawa What is total quality control the japanese way , 2002 .

[25]  Urban Kjellén,et al.  Reducing risks by deviation control—a retrospection into a research strategy , 1993 .

[26]  石川 馨 What is total quality control? : the Japanese way , 1985 .

[27]  Hr Phillips,et al.  Development of a discussion document on the safety related research needs of the coal industry. , 1994 .

[28]  D. Hewett,et al.  How to investigate and analyse clinical incidents: Clinical Risk Unit and Association of Litigation and Risk Management protocol , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  Mark E. Armstrong,et al.  Human Factors in Incident Investigation , 1989 .

[30]  R. Blumenthal A retrospective descriptive study of electrocution deaths in Gauteng, South Africa: 2001-2004. , 2009, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[31]  P. Cabanes,et al.  Outcome of occupational electrical injuries among French electric company workers: a retrospective report of 311 cases, 1996-2005. , 2014, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[32]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A new accident model for engineering safer systems , 2004 .

[33]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Near‐Miss Incident Management in the Chemical Process Industry , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[34]  Naveed Ramzan,et al.  Incident investigation in Pakistan's fertilizer industry—Common safety management system failures and issues , 2014 .