Towards automatic measurement of anteversion and neck–shaft angles in human femurs using CT images

Automatic assessment of human femur morphology may provide useful clinical information with regard to hip and knee surgery, prosthesis design and management of hip instability. To this end, neck–shaft and anteversion angles are usually used. We propose a full automatic method to estimate these angles in human femurs. Multislice CT images from 18 dried bones were analysed. The algorithm fits 3D cylinders to different regions of the bone to estimate the angles. A manual segmentation and a conventional angle assessment were used for validation. We found anteversion angle as 20 ± 7° and neck–shaft angle as 130 ± 9°. Mean distances from femur surface to cylinders were 5.5 ± 0.6, 3.5 ± 0.6 and 2.4 ± 0.4 mm for condyles, diaphysis and neck regions, respectively. Automatic and conventional angles were positively correlated (r2>0.85). Manual and automatic segmentations did not differ. The method was fast and 100% reproducible. A robust in vivo segmentation algorithm should be integrated to advance towards a clinically compliant methodology.

[1]  S. B. Park,et al.  Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 2:3D modelling method , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[2]  Manish Agarwal,et al.  Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics Automated Identification of Anatomical Landmarks on 3d Bone Models Reconstructed from Ct Scan Images , 2022 .

[3]  Federico E. Milano,et al.  Angle estimation of human femora in a three-dimensional virtual environment , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[4]  H. Johnson,et al.  A comparison of 'traditional' and multimedia information systems development practices , 2003, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[5]  J.A. De Guise,et al.  Automated Method for Clinic and Morphologic Analysis of Bones Using Implicit Modeling Technique , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  F. Hoaglund,et al.  Anatomy of the femoral neck and head, with comparative data from Caucasians and Hong Kong Chinese. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  V. Musahl,et al.  Reliability of image-free navigation to monitor lower-limb alignment. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  V. Jansson,et al.  Normal development of the hip: a geometrical analysis based on planimetric radiography , 2010, Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B.

[9]  Low Wd,et al.  Anatomy of the femoral neck and head, with comparative data from Caucasians and Hong Kong Chinese. , 1980 .

[10]  B. Isaac,et al.  Prediction of the femoral neck‐shaft angle from the length of the femoral neck , 1997, Clinical anatomy.

[11]  K. Subburaj,et al.  Computer-aided methods for assessing lower limb deformities in orthopaedic surgery planning , 2010, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[12]  Damian Craiem,et al.  Coronary Arteries Simplified with 3D Cylinders to Assess True Bifurcation Angles in Atherosclerotic Patients , 2009, Cardiovascular engineering.

[13]  P. Noble,et al.  A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  E Fønstelien,et al.  Evaluation of Three Methods for Measurement of Femoral Neck Anteversion , 1989, Acta radiologica.

[15]  S. I. Kim,et al.  Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 1: 3D imaging method , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[16]  C. Krettek,et al.  Navigated femoral anteversion measurements: general precision and registration options , 2009, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[17]  Wilhelm Burger,et al.  Digital Image Processing - An Algorithmic Introduction using Java , 2008, Texts in Computer Science.

[18]  Beat Schmutz,et al.  Development and validation of a generic 3D model of the distal femur , 2006, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[19]  E. Tayton.  Femoral anteversion: a necessary angle or an evolutionary vestige? , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[20]  Anthony Skalak,et al.  Proximal Femoral Anatomy in the Normal Human Population , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  Marie-Pierre Jolly,et al.  Automatic femur segmentation and condyle line detection in 3D MR scans for alignment of high resolution MR , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.