Full-Scale Accident Testing in Support of Used Nuclear Fuel Transportation.

The safe transport of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste is an important aspect of the waste management system of the United States. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) currently certifies spent nuclear fuel rail cask designs based primarily on numerical modeling of hypothetical accident conditions augmented with some small scale testing. However, NRC initiated a Package Performance Study (PPS) in 2001 to examine the response of full-scale rail casks in extreme transportation accidents. The objectives of PPS were to demonstrate the safety of transportation casks and to provide high-fidelity data for validating the modeling. Although work on the PPS eventually stopped, the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future recommended in 2012 that the test plans be re-examined. This recommendation was in recognition of substantial public feedback calling for a full-scale severe accident test of a rail cask to verify evaluations by NRC, which find that risk from the transport of spent fuel in certified casks is extremely low. This report, which serves as the re-assessment, provides a summary of the history of the PPS planning, identifies the objectives and technical issues that drove the scope of the PPS, and presents a possible path for moving forward in planningmore » to conduct a full-scale cask test. Because full-scale testing is expensive, the value of such testing on public perceptions and public acceptance is important. Consequently, the path forward starts with a public perception component followed by two additional components: accident simulation and first responder training. The proposed path forward presents a series of study options with several points where the package performance study could be redirected if warranted.« less

[1]  Ruth F. Weiner,et al.  Spent fuel transportation risk assessment: overview , 2013 .

[2]  Elias Levy,et al.  Worst-Case Scenario , 2006, IEEE Security & Privacy.

[3]  Jeremy L. Sprung Reexamination of spent fuel shipment risk estimates , 2000 .

[4]  C. K. Chou,et al.  SHIPPING CONTAINER RESPONSE TO SEVERE HIGHWAY AND RAILWAY ACCIDENT CONDITIONS. MAIN REPORT , 1988 .

[5]  Nancy Huddleston,et al.  Going the distance? The safe transport of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste in the United States , 2007 .

[6]  Douglas James Ammerman,et al.  Numerical Analyses of Locomotive Impacts on a Spent Fuel Truck Cask and Trailer , 2005 .

[7]  William D. Travers OPTIONS FOR FULL-SCALE SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL TRANSPORTATION CASK TESTING UNDER THE PACKAGE PERFORMANCE STUDY , 2004 .

[8]  Jeffrey R. Williams,et al.  Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste , 2013 .

[9]  N. R. Ortiz,et al.  Transportation of radionuclides in urban environs: draft environmental assessment , 1980 .

[10]  Kevin B. McGrattan,et al.  Numerical Simulation of the Howard Street Tunnel Fire, Baltimore, Maryland, July 2001 | NIST , 2002 .

[11]  Robert M Jefferson,et al.  CRASH TESTING OF NUCLEAR FUEL SHIPPING CONTAINERS , 1978 .

[12]  S. Greene,et al.  Storage and Transport Cask Data For Used Commercial Nuclear Fuel , 2013 .

[13]  A S Garabedian,et al.  ANALYSIS OF RAIL CAR COMPONENTS EXPOSED TO A TUNNEL FIRE ENVIRONMENT , 2003 .

[14]  Judith M. Cuta,et al.  The MacArthur Maze Fire and Roadway Collapse: A “Worst Case Scenario” for Spent Nuclear Fuel Transportation? , 2012 .

[15]  Robert J. Halstead,et al.  Full-Scale Cask Testing and Public Acceptance of Spent Nuclear Fuel Shipments - 12254 , 2012 .

[16]  E. Buckingham On Physically Similar Systems; Illustrations of the Use of Dimensional Equations , 1914 .

[17]  Kevin B. McGrattan,et al.  Numerical Simulation of the Howard Street Tunnel Fire, Baltimore, Maryland, July 2001 | NIST , 2002 .

[18]  J. R. Cook REEXAMINATION OF SPENT FUEL SHIPMENT RISK ESTIMATES , 2000 .