A computerized analysis of the shape and stability of mandibular arch form.

To determine whether a particular ideal orthodontic arch form could be identified, the mandibular dental casts of 30 untreated normal cases, 30 Class I nonextraction cases, and 30 Class II nonextraction cases were examined. Following computerized digitizing and the use of a mathematic function called polynomial of the fourth degree, arch forms were generated for each sample and then compared to 17 commercially produced arch forms. Results showed that no particular arch form predominated in any of the three samples. A shape representing a combination of the "Par" and "Vari-Simplex" arch forms approximated to only 50% of the cases in the three samples. The remaining 50% of the cases displayed a wide variety of arch forms. Cases that had changes in arch form during nonextraction treatment frequently were not stable; almost 70% showed significant long-term posttreatment changes. Customizing arch forms appears to be necessary in many cases to obtain optimum long-term stability because of the great individual variability in arch form found in this study.

[1]  B. S. Savara,et al.  Arc Length of the Dental Arch Estimated by Multiple Regression , 1970, Journal of dental research.

[2]  Gardner Sd,et al.  Posttreatment and postretention changes following orthodontic therapy. , 1976 .

[3]  J. Robnett.  Segment concept in arch pattern design. , 1980, American Journal of Orthodontics.

[4]  G. Izard,et al.  New method for the determination of the normal arch by the function of the face , 1927 .

[5]  Scher Ea,et al.  The ideal form of the human dental arcade, with some prosthetic application. , 1949 .

[6]  Thomas M. Graber,et al.  Current orthodontic concepts and techniques , 1975 .

[7]  L. Andrews.  The six keys to normal occlusion. , 1972, American journal of orthodontics.

[8]  G. Black,et al.  Descriptive Anatomy of the Human Teeth , 1890, The American Journal of Dental Science.

[9]  P D Sampson,et al.  Dental arch shape: a statistical analysis using conic sections. , 1981, American journal of orthodontics.

[10]  White Lw.  Individualized ideal arches. , 1978 .

[11]  D. R. McCauley.  The cuspid and its function in retention , 1944 .

[12]  G. Engel.  Preformed arch wires: reliability of fit. , 1979, American journal of orthodontics.

[13]  J. Scott,et al.  The Shape of the Dental Arches , 1957, Journal of dental research.

[14]  C. A. Hawley.  Determination of the normal arch, and its application to orthodontia , 1905 .

[15]  L F Andrews,et al.  The Straight-Wire Appliance , 1979, Informationen aus Orthodontie und Kieferorthopadie : mit Beitragen aus der internationalen Literatur.

[16]  J. L. Ackerman,et al.  The catenometer: a reliable device for estimating dental arch perimeter. , 1973, American journal of orthodontics.

[17]  P. Shapiro,et al.  Mandibular dental arch form and dimension. Treatment and postretention changes. , 1974, American journal of orthodontics.

[18]  A C Brader,et al.  Dental arch form related with intraoral forces: PR=C. , 1972, American journal of orthodontics.

[19]  R. C. Wheeler.  Textbook of Dental Anatomy and Physiology , 1965 .

[20]  E A BeGole,et al.  Application of the Cubic Spline Function in the Description of Dental Arch Form , 1980, Journal of dental research.

[21]  F. L. Stanton.  Arch predetermination and a method of relating the predetermined arch to the malocclusion, to show the minimum tooth movement , 1922 .

[22]  J H Currier,et al.  A computerized geometric analysis of human dental arch form. , 1969, American journal of orthodontics.