Probabilistic Seismic Assessment of RC Bridges: Part I — Uncertainty Models

Abstract The seismic response of structures depends on a large number of aleatory and epistemic uncertainties surrounding the estimation of the structural demand and capacity, both usually featuring considerable dispersion levels, particularly when reinforced concrete structures are being assessed. When bridges are considered, the complexity level increases, given that most of those behave irregularly in the transverse direction. Several procedures may be used for the assessment of the seismic safety of bridges, namely the ones used to estimate the demand, investigated in a companion paper, ranging from linear or nonlinear static procedures to more accurate ones, based on nonlinear dynamic analysis. This work makes use of the latter, commonly seen as more accurate, to compute the failure probability of existing bridges using a relatively simple framework. Different variables typically considered in a seismic assessment procedure (geometry, material properties, earthquake records, intensity level) are statistically characterised, enabling a global simulation process, where each iteration step is associated to an independent structural nonlinear dynamic analysis. Failure probability is then obtained through the probabilistic analysis of a safety indicator, defined as the difference between capacity and demand. An alternative uncertainty model, given by the convolution between the capacity and demand distributions, obtained independently, is also applied. A case study of seven bridge configurations, with different (ir)regularity levels, is considered together with a relatively large set of real earthquake records. The simulation process is carried out using the Latin Hypercube sampling algorithm, expected to considerably reduce the number of realisations with no reliability loss. Conclusions have allowed the identification of vulnerable configurations and shown the importance of the variable detail level when considering different uncertainty models.

[1]  Rui Pinho,et al.  IMPROVED FRAGILITY FUNCTIONS FOR RC BRIDGE POPULATIONS , 2015 .

[2]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Evaluation of Nonlinear Static Procedures in the Assessment of Building Frames , 2013 .

[3]  Aníbal Costa Análise sísmica de estruturas irregulares , 1990 .

[4]  Junwon Seo,et al.  Use of response surface metamodels to generate system level fragilities for existing curved steel bridges , 2013 .

[5]  James E. Campbell,et al.  An Approach to Sensitivity Analysis of Computer Models: Part I—Introduction, Input Variable Selection and Preliminary Variable Assessment , 1981 .

[6]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  Probabilistic Seismic Demand Model for California Highway Bridges , 2001 .

[7]  Joonam Park,et al.  Rapid seismic damage assessment of railway bridges using the response-surface statistical model , 2014 .

[8]  P. Pinto Reliability methods in earthquake engineering , 2001 .

[9]  Junwon Seo,et al.  Horizontally curved steel bridge seismic vulnerability assessment , 2012 .

[10]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Evaluation of Bridge Abutment Capacity and Stiffness during Earthquakes , 1997 .

[11]  Mário Lopes,et al.  Seismic performance of irregular bridges – comparison of different nonlinear static procedures , 2015 .

[12]  Rui Pinho,et al.  VERIFICATION OF SPECTRAL REDUCTION FACTORS FOR SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF BRIDGES , 2009 .

[13]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Spectral reduction factors evaluation for seismic assessment of frame buildings , 2014 .

[14]  Claudio Modena,et al.  A probabilistic strategy for seismic assessment and FRP retrofitting of existing bridges , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[15]  Marios K. Chryssanthopoulos,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of strength and ductility of confined reinforced concrete members , 1999 .

[16]  Sami Megally,et al.  Capacity Evaluation of Exterior Sacrificial Shear Keys of Bridge Abutments , 2006 .

[17]  Gian Michele Calvi,et al.  Adaptive pushover-based methods for seismic assessment and design of bridge structures , 2005 .

[18]  A. Olsson,et al.  On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis , 2003 .

[19]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[20]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[21]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Application of Nonlinear Static Procedures for the Seismic Assessment of Regular RC Moment Frame Buildings , 2014 .

[22]  Bilal M. Ayyub,et al.  Structural Reliability Assessment Using Latin Hypercube Sampling , 1990 .

[23]  Humberto Varum Modelo numérico para a análise sísmica de pórticos planos de betão armado , 1995 .

[24]  João Paulo Sousa Costa de Miranda Guedes,et al.  Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete bridges : modelling, numerical analysis and experimental assessment , 1997 .

[25]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Using nonlinear static procedures for seismic assessment of the 3D irregular SPEAR building , 2010 .

[26]  Aníbal Costa,et al.  Analytical evaluation of structural component limit state probabilities , 2008 .

[27]  Aníbal Costa,et al.  Ongoing research on seismic safety assessment , 2010 .

[28]  Ricardo Nuno Carvalho Monteiro,et al.  Probabilistic seismic assessment of bridges , 2012 .

[29]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges , 1996 .

[30]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  The Analysis of Structural Safety , 1964 .

[31]  Anastasios Sextos,et al.  Multi‐angle, multi‐damage fragility curves for seismic assessment of bridges , 2015 .

[32]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  A probabilistic approach for the prediction of seismic resilience of bridges , 2013 .

[33]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones , 2004 .

[34]  J. Bommer,et al.  THE EFFECTIVE DURATION OF EARTHQUAKE STRONG MOTION , 1999 .

[35]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Assessment of Continuous Span Bridges through Nonlinear Static Procedures , 2009 .

[36]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Seismic assessment of structures and lifelines , 2015 .

[37]  Andreas J. Kappos,et al.  Extension of modal pushover analysis to seismic assessment of bridges , 2006 .

[38]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Analytical Seismic Fragility Curves for Typical Bridges in the Central and Southeastern United States , 2007 .

[39]  A. Olsson,et al.  On Latin Hypercube Sampling for Stochastic Finite Element Analysis , 1999 .