An event-related brain potential study of cross-modal links in spatial attention between vision and touch.

Event-related potential (ERP) evidence for the existence of cross-modal links in endogenous spatial attention between vision and touch was obtained in an experiment where participants had to detect tactile or visual targets on the attended side and to ignore the irrelevant modality and stimuli on the unattended side. For visual ERPs, attentional modulations of occipital P1 and N1 components were present when attention was directed both within vision and within touch, indicating that links in spatial attention from touch to vision can affect early stages of visual processing. For somatosensory ERPs, attentional negativities starting around 140 ms poststimulus were present at midline and lateral central electrodes when touch was relevant. No attentional somatosensory ERP modulations were present when vision was relevant and tactile stimuli could be entirely ignored. However, in another task condition where responses were also required to infrequent tactile targets regardless of their location, visual-spatial attention modulated somatosensory ERPs. Unlike vision, touch apparently can be decoupled from attentional orienting within another modality unless it is potentially relevant.

[1]  J. Driver,et al.  Audiovisual links in endogenous covert spatial attention. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  M. Eimer “Sensory gating” as a mechanism for visuospatial orienting: Electrophysiological evidence from trial-by-trial cuing experiments , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  P. Michie,et al.  Selective Attention Effects on Somatosensory Event‐Related Potentials , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Mechanisms of Visuospatial Attention: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials , 1998 .

[6]  H. Buchtel,et al.  Spatial attentional shifts: Further evidence for the role of polysensory mechanisms using visual and tactile stimuli , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  C. Spence,et al.  Attention and the crossmodal construction of space , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  E. Schröger,et al.  ERP effects of intermodal attention and cross-modal links in spatial attention. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[10]  R. Eason Visual evoked potential correlates of early neural filtering during selective attention , 1981 .

[11]  P. Michie,et al.  The effects of spatial selective attention on the somatosensory event-related potential. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[12]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Supramodal and modality-specific mechanisms for stimulus-driven shifts of auditory and visual attention. , 1994, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[13]  F. Mauguière,et al.  Somatosensory responses during selective spatial attention: The N120‐to‐N140 trasition , 1995 .

[14]  C. Spence,et al.  Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Charles Spence,et al.  Spatial synergies between auditory and visual attention. , 1994 .

[16]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrocortical substrates of visual selective attention , 1993 .

[17]  J. Driver,et al.  Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  G. Mangun Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[19]  C. Spence,et al.  Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  William C. Ogden,et al.  Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location , 2014 .

[21]  M. Eimer ERP modulations indicate the selective processing of visual stimuli as a result of transient and sustained spatial attention. , 1996, Psychophysiology.