A novel Bayesian adaptive method for mapping the visual field
暂无分享,去创建一个
Pengjing Xu | Luis A. Lesmes | Deyue Yu | Zhong-Lin Lu | Zhong-Lin Lu | L. Lesmes | Deyue Yu | Pengjing Xu
[1] A Heijl,et al. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. , 1989, American journal of ophthalmology.
[2] C A Johnson,et al. Properties of staircase procedures for estimating thresholds in automated perimetry. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[3] Fiona J Rowe,et al. Detection of Visual Field Loss in Pituitary Disease: Peripheral Kinetic Versus Central Static , 2015, Neuro-ophthalmology.
[4] Luke X. Chong,et al. A New SITA Perimetric Threshold Testing Algorithm: Construction and a Multicenter Clinical Study. , 2019, American journal of ophthalmology.
[5] M. Easterbrook,et al. The use of Amsler grids in early chloroquine retinopathy. , 1984, Ophthalmology.
[6] Jay I. Myung,et al. A hierarchical Bayesian approach to adaptive vision testing: A case study with the contrast sensitivity function , 2016, Journal of vision.
[7] Ian Murray,et al. Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP): A novel technique for automated static perimetry in children using eye tracking , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).
[8] Chris A Johnson,et al. A History of Perimetry and Visual Field Testing , 2011, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.
[9] A. Watson,et al. QUEST+: A general multidimensional Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. , 2017, Journal of vision.
[10] Chris Visscher,et al. Effects of Limited Peripheral Vision on Shuttle Sprint Performance of Soccer Players , 2005, Perceptual and motor skills.
[11] E. Werner,et al. Variability of static visual threshold responses in patients with elevated IOPs. , 1982, Archives of ophthalmology.
[12] Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. , 1994, Ophthalmology.
[13] Chang-Bing Huang,et al. qCSF in clinical application: efficient characterization and classification of contrast sensitivity functions in amblyopia. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[14] R. P. Mills,et al. Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.
[15] Zhong-Lin Lu,et al. Developing Bayesian adaptive methods for estimating sensitivity thresholds (d′) in Yes-No and forced-choice tasks , 2015, Front. Psychol..
[16] William F. Hoyt. Eye Signs and Symptoms in Brain Tumors , 1977 .
[17] H H Hunt,et al. Threshold variation in automated perimetry. , 1993, Survey of ophthalmology.
[18] Michael Wall,et al. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[19] Scott Whyte,et al. Perimetric homonymous visual field loss post-stroke , 2007, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.
[20] Lester C. Loschky,et al. The contributions of central versus peripheral vision to scene gist recognition. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[21] B C Chauhan,et al. Comparison of conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry in a prospective study of patients with glaucoma and healthy controls. , 1999, Archives of ophthalmology.
[22] Luis A. Lesmes,et al. Bayesian adaptive estimation of threshold versus contrast external noise functions: The quick TvC method , 2006, Vision Research.
[23] S. Graham,et al. Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects. , 1998, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[24] L. Frisén,et al. High-pass resolution perimetry , 1993, Documenta Ophthalmologica.
[25] David Wittenburg. Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program Assessment of PostRollout Implementation and Early Impacts , 2007 .
[26] Rizwan Malik,et al. Contrast Sensitivity Perimetry and Clinical Measures of Glaucomatous Damage , 2014, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.
[27] C. Johnson,et al. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[28] P.EWEN KING-SMITH,et al. PII: S0042-6989(96)00310-0 , 1997 .
[29] A. Ramé. [Age-related macular degeneration]. , 2006, Revue de l'infirmiere.
[30] Rocío Alcalá-Quintana,et al. A comparison of fixed-step-size and Bayesian staircases for sensory threshold estimation. , 2007, Spatial vision.
[31] Dennis M. Levi,et al. Crowding in Peripheral Vision: Why Bigger Is Better , 2009, Current Biology.
[32] William H Swanson,et al. Choice of Stimulus Range and Size Can Reduce Test-Retest Variability in Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects. , 2014, Translational vision science & technology.
[33] Preeti Verghese,et al. The psychophysics of visual search , 2000, Vision Research.
[34] Igor Kononenko,et al. Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective , 2001, Artif. Intell. Medicine.
[35] Zhang Huicheng. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry , 2002 .
[36] Luis A. Lesmes,et al. Efficient assessment of the time course of perceptual sensitivity change , 2019, Vision Research.
[37] Aart C Kooijman,et al. Relationship between contrast sensitivity and spherical aberration: Comparison of 7 contrast sensitivity tests with natural and artificial pupils in healthy eyes , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.
[38] R. Rosenholtz,et al. A summary-statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual crowding. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[39] R A Applegate,et al. Corneal aberrations and visual performance after radial keratotomy. , 1998, Journal of refractive surgery.
[40] Luis A. Lesmes,et al. Bayesian adaptive estimation of the sensory memory decay function: the quick Partial Report method , 2014 .
[41] J L Keltner,et al. Variability of quantitative automated perimetry in normal observers. , 1986, Ophthalmology.
[42] Zhong-Lin Lu,et al. qPR: An adaptive partial-report procedure based on Bayesian inference , 2016, Journal of vision.
[43] Robert N Weinreb,et al. The glaucoma research community and FDA look to the future: a report from the NEI/FDA CDER Glaucoma Clinical Trial Design and Endpoints Symposium. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[44] R. Kardon,et al. Pupil perimetry. , 1992, Current opinion in ophthalmology.
[45] Mark A. Pitt,et al. Planning Beyond the Next Trial in Adaptive Experiments: A Dynamic Programming Approach , 2017, Cogn. Sci..
[46] A. Watson,et al. Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.
[47] M. Leek. Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[48] R A Applegate,et al. Changes in corneal wavefront aberrations with aging. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[49] B. Treutwein. Adaptive psychophysical procedures , 1995, Vision Research.
[50] B C Chauhan,et al. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[51] M Schulzer,et al. Errors in the diagnosis of visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma. , 1994, Ophthalmology.
[52] A H Israel,et al. [Color perimetry]. , 1971, Archivos de oftalmologia de Buenos Aires.
[53] B. Joondeph,et al. Variation in visual field measurements with an automated perimeter. , 1984, American journal of ophthalmology.
[54] J. Palmer,et al. Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[55] P A Sample,et al. Color perimetry for assessment of primary open-angle glaucoma. , 1990, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[56] Chris A Johnson,et al. Comparison of the new perimetric GATE strategy with conventional full-threshold and SITA standard strategies. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[57] William H. Swanson,et al. Between-Subject Variability in Healthy Eyes as a Primary Source of Structural–Functional Discordance in Patients With Glaucoma , 2016, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[58] C. Johnson,et al. Which method of flicker perimetry is most effective for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss? , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[59] Chris A. Johnson,et al. CONFIRMATION OF VISUAL FIELD ABNORMALITIES IN THE OCULAR HYPERTENSION TREATMENT STUDY (OHTS) , 1999 .
[60] Eiichi Sato,et al. Combined use of SLO microperimetry and OCT for retinal functional and structural testing , 2006, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.
[61] P. Lennie,et al. Visual Impairments: Determining Eligibility for Social Security Benefits , 2002 .
[62] D G Pelli,et al. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[63] G. Lindgren,et al. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. , 1987, Archives of ophthalmology.
[64] Joanne M. Wood,et al. Closed-Road Circuit Age and Visual Impairment Decrease Driving Performance as Measured on a , 2005 .
[65] W A Simpson. The step method: A new adaptive psychophysical procedure , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.
[66] Alexander Strand,et al. Identifying SSA's Sequential Disability Determination Steps Using Administrative Data , 2013 .
[67] F A Wichmann,et al. Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .
[68] Robert N Weinreb,et al. Glaucoma research community and FDA look to the future, II: NEI/FDA Glaucoma Clinical Trial Design and Endpoints Symposium: measures of structural change and visual function. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[69] P A Sample,et al. Progressive color visual field loss in glaucoma. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[70] J Katz,et al. Rate of progression in open-angle glaucoma estimated from cross-sectional prevalence of visual field damage. , 1996, American journal of ophthalmology.
[71] Alexander M. Mood,et al. A Method for Obtaining and Analyzing Sensitivity Data , 1948 .
[72] S. Markowitz,et al. Principles of modern low vision rehabilitation. , 2006, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.
[73] Barbara Anne Dosher,et al. Evaluating the performance of the staircase and quick Change Detection methods in measuring perceptual learning , 2018, Journal of vision.
[74] Linda M. Zangwill,et al. Comparison of Visual Field Severity Classification Systems for Glaucoma , 2012, Journal of glaucoma.
[75] D. Gottlieb,et al. The unidirectionality of cerebral polyopia. , 1992, Journal of clinical neuro-ophthalmology.
[76] Michael Dorr,et al. Using 10AFC to further improve the efficiency of the quick CSF method. , 2015, Journal of vision.
[77] Chris A Johnson,et al. Classification of visual field abnormalities in the ocular hypertension treatment study. , 2000, Archives of ophthalmology.
[78] Tetsuro Oshika,et al. Vision-related quality of life in patients with pituitary adenoma. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.
[79] Douglas R. Anderson,et al. Clinical Decisions In Glaucoma , 1993 .
[80] H. Brash,et al. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking. , 2009, Ophthalmology.
[81] M. Weitzman,et al. Comparison between Tendency-Oriented Perimetry (TOP) and octopus threshold perimetry. , 2000, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.).
[82] B J Lachenmayr,et al. The different effects of aging on normal sensitivity in flicker and light-sense perimetry. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[83] William H Swanson,et al. Estimation of spatial scale across the visual field using sinusoidal stimuli. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[84] Rhea Lloyd,et al. Food and Drug Administration approval process for ophthalmic drugs in the US , 2008, Current opinion in ophthalmology.
[85] D. G. Green,et al. Contrast sensitivity of the human peripheral retina. , 1969, Vision research.
[86] Beatriz Munoz,et al. Glaucoma and reading speed: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation project. , 2009, Archives of ophthalmology.
[87] G E Trope,et al. Evaluation of FASTPAC, a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyzer, in a glaucomatous population. , 1993, Ophthalmology.
[88] D H Brainard,et al. The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[89] S. Yamamoto,et al. Correlation of retinal sensitivity measured with fundus-related microperimetry to visual acuity and retinal thickness in eyes with diabetic macular edema , 2006, Eye.
[90] Michael Dorr,et al. Next-generation vision testing: the quick CSF , 2015 .
[91] J Flammer,et al. Quantification of glaucomatous visual field defects with automated perimetry. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[92] Shirin E. Hassan,et al. Visual Field Size Criteria for Mobility Rehabilitation Referral , 2010, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.
[93] George Sperling,et al. A Systems Analysis of Visual Motion Perception , 1999 .
[94] D. Altman,et al. STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.
[95] D. Landers,et al. Mediating Effects of Peripheral Vision in the Life Event Stress/Athletic Injury Relationship , 2005 .
[96] C. Tyler,et al. Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold , 1999, Vision Research.
[97] Chris A. Johnson,et al. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, ZEST, and SITA-like strategies, as determined by computer simulation. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[98] Tuomas J. Lukka,et al. Bayesian adaptive estimation: The next dimension , 2006 .
[99] R A Applegate,et al. Corneal first surface optical aberrations and visual performance. , 2000, Journal of refractive surgery.
[100] J Caprioli,et al. Automated perimetry in glaucoma. , 1991, American journal of ophthalmology.
[101] B. Dosher,et al. Characterizing observers using external noise and observer models: assessing internal representations with external noise. , 2008, Psychological review.
[102] H. Goldmann,et al. Grundlagen exakter Perimetrie , 1945 .
[103] A Heijl,et al. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. , 1998, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.
[104] J J Corbett,et al. The relationship between visual acuity, pupillary defect, and visual field loss. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.
[105] D R May,et al. Threshold Amsler grid testing in maculopathies. , 1987, Ophthalmology.
[106] Douglas R. Anderson,et al. Automatic Perimetry in Glaucoma: A Practical Guide , 1985 .
[107] Richard B. Rosen,et al. Combined Three-Dimensional Spectral OCT/SLO Topography and Microperimetry: Steps toward Achieving Functional Spectral OCT/SLO , 2009, Ophthalmic Research.
[108] P. Wishart,et al. Determining progressive visual field loss in serial Humphrey visual fields. , 1995, Ophthalmology.
[109] Sumeet Dua,et al. Computational Analysis of the Human Eye with Applications , 2011 .
[110] I. Bailey,et al. Visual Factors and Orientation‐Mobility Performance , 1982, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.
[111] J. Smythies. A Note on the Concept of the Visual Field in Neurology, Psychology, and Visual Neuroscience , 1996, Perception.
[112] S. Drance,et al. Light-sense, flicker and resolution perimetry in glaucoma: a comparative study , 2004, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.
[113] Zhong-Lin Lu,et al. Visual Psychophysics: From Laboratory to Theory , 2013 .
[114] Paolo Brusini,et al. Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from prediagnosis to end-stage disease. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.
[115] Lene Martin,et al. Rarebit and frequency-doubling technology perimetry in children and young adults. , 2005, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.
[116] Kazunori Miyata,et al. Contrast sensitivity function and ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations in normal human eyes. , 2006, Ophthalmology.
[117] Barbara Dosher,et al. Category and Perceptual Learning in Subjects with Treated Wilson's Disease , 2010, PloS one.
[118] S. McKee,et al. Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.
[119] J. Katz,et al. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[120] Zhong-Lin Lu,et al. Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity function: the quick CSF method. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[121] Donald C Hood,et al. The multifocal visual evoked potential. , 2003, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.
[122] Chris A. Johnson. Recent developments in automated perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis and management. , 2002, Current opinion in ophthalmology.
[123] Wolfgang Fink,et al. Novel 3D Computer-Automated Threshold Amsler Grid Visual Field Testing of Scotomas in Patients with Glaucoma , 2009, European journal of ophthalmology.
[124] R. Rosenholtz,et al. A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual search. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[125] Anders Heijl,et al. The Humphrey Field Analyzer, Construction and Concepts , 1985 .
[126] J. D. Tompkins,et al. Characteristics of frequency-of-seeing curves in normal subjects, patients with suspected glaucoma, and patients with glaucoma. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[127] I. Rentschler,et al. Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: a review. , 2011, Journal of vision.
[128] Allison M McKendrick,et al. Recent developments in perimetry: test stimuli and procedures , 2005, Clinical & experimental optometry.
[129] R. Kardon,et al. Automated pupil perimetry. Pupil field mapping in patients and normal subjects. , 1991, Ophthalmology.
[130] Peter J. Bex,et al. Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method , 2019, Journal of vision.
[131] P. King-Smith,et al. Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation , 1994, Vision Research.
[132] A. Sommer,et al. Estimating progression of visual field loss in glaucoma. , 1997, Ophthalmology.
[133] A Heijl,et al. COMPUTER TEST LOGICS FOR AUTOMATIC PERIMETRY , 1977, Acta ophthalmologica.
[134] A. Heijl,et al. Visual fields correlate better than visual acuity to severity of diabetic retinopathy , 2005, Diabetologia.
[135] H. Mallot,et al. Assessment of vision-related quality of life in patients with homonymous visual field defects , 2007, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.
[136] G L Portney. Visual field testing. , 1976, The Western journal of medicine.
[137] Tg Tanner,et al. Generalized adaptive procedure for psychometric measurement , 2008 .
[138] C. O'brien,et al. Evaluation of the Humphrey FASTPAC threshold program in glaucoma. , 1994, The British journal of ophthalmology.
[139] D M Green,et al. Further studies of a maximum-likelihood yes-no procedure. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[140] A. Azuara-Blanco,et al. Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients , 2002, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.
[141] Wolfgang Fink,et al. Three-dimensional computer-automated threshold Amsler grid test. , 2004, Journal of biomedical optics.
[142] Douglas R. Anderson. Automated Static Perimetry , 1992 .
[143] Yue Wu,et al. Forecasting future Humphrey Visual Fields using deep learning , 2018, bioRxiv.
[144] Pengjing Xu,et al. Identify mechanisms of amblyopia in Gabor orientation identification with external noise , 2006, Vision Research.
[145] Mark A. Pitt,et al. A Hierarchical Adaptive Approach to Optimal Experimental Design , 2014, Neural Computation.
[146] Hans Bebie,et al. Automated perimetry : visual field digest , 2004 .
[147] Peter Wanger,et al. New Perimetric Techniques: A Comparison between Rarebit and Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry in Normal Subjects and Glaucoma Patients , 2004, Journal of glaucoma.
[148] H. Rootzén,et al. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.
[149] P. Ramulu. Glaucoma and disability: which tasks are affected, and at what stage of disease? , 2009, Current opinion in ophthalmology.
[150] J Katz,et al. A longitudinal study of the age-adjusted variability of automated visual fields. , 1987, Archives of ophthalmology.
[151] M. García-Pérez,et al. Bayesian adaptive estimation of arbitrary points on a psychometric function. , 2007, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.
[152] M. L. Salvetat,et al. Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.
[153] Pengjing Xu,et al. Spatial vision deficit underlies poor sine-wave motion direction discrimination in anisometropic amblyopia. , 2007, Journal of vision.
[154] H. Goldmann,et al. Ein selbstregistrierendes Projektionskugelperimeter , 1945 .
[155] C. Johnson,et al. Incidence of visual field loss in 20,000 eyes and its relationship to driving performance. , 1983, Archives of ophthalmology.
[156] K W Clark,et al. Color contrast perimetry. , 1984, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[157] M. Wall,et al. Random dot motion perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in normal subjects. , 1995, American journal of ophthalmology.
[158] Yuko Ohno,et al. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[159] V. Dreyer,et al. Visual acuity. , 1974, Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde.
[160] A. James. The pattern-pulse multifocal visual evoked potential. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[161] Joel S Schuman,et al. Diagnostic tools for glaucoma detection and management. , 2008, Survey of ophthalmology.
[162] Sieu K. Khuu,et al. A comparison of Goldmann III, V and spatially equated test stimuli in visual field testing: the importance of complete and partial spatial summation , 2017, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.
[163] Susana T. L. Chung,et al. Reading speed in the peripheral visual field of older adults: Does it benefit from perceptual learning? , 2010, Vision Research.
[164] S. Klein,et al. Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[165] Marian Kaplun Shapiro,et al. Visual field test , 2017 .
[166] A HIGGITT,et al. Reading Test in Glaucoma * , 1955, The British journal of ophthalmology.
[167] Zhong-Lin Lu,et al. Bayesian adaptive assessment of the reading function for vision: The qReading method , 2018, Journal of vision.
[168] D. Broadway,et al. Visual field testing for glaucoma – a practical guide , 2012, Community eye health.
[169] F. Bremner,et al. Pupil perimetry in the diagnosis of functional visual field loss. , 2002, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.