Intelligent Agents: Specification, Modeling, and Applications

One of the most appealing features of multiagent technology is its natural way to modularise a complex system in terms of multiple, interacting and autonomous components. As a natural extension of classes, castes introduced in the formal specification language SLAB provide a language facility that provides modularity in the formal specification of multiagent systems. A caste represents a set of agents of common structural and behavioural characteristics. A caste description defines the tasks that the agents of the caste are capable of, the rules that govern their behaviour, and the environment that they live in. The inheritance relationship between castes defines the sub-group relationship between the agents so that special capabilities and behaviours can be introduced. The instance relationship between an agent and a caste declares that an agent is a member of a caste. This paper discuses how the caste facility can be employed to specify multiagent systems so that the notion of roles, organisational structures of agent societies, communication and, collaboration protocols etc. can be naturally represented.

[1]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[2]  E. Mizutani,et al.  Neuro-Fuzzy and Soft Computing-A Computational Approach to Learning and Machine Intelligence [Book Review] , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[3]  Erik P. de Vink,et al.  Step semantics for “true” concurrency with recursion , 1989, Distributed Computing.

[4]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Agent-Oriented Programming , 1992, Artif. Intell..

[5]  E. Durfee,et al.  The Impact of Nested Agent Models in an Information Economy , 1996 .

[6]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[7]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Flexible double auctions for electronic commerce: theory and implementation , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  Intention is Choice with Commitment , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[9]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  Benefits of Learning in Negotiation , 1997, AAAI/IAAI.

[10]  Sandip Sen,et al.  A buyer's agent , 2000, AGENTS '00.

[11]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  Reuse and Abstraction in Verification: Agents Acting in Dynamic Environments , 2009, AOSE.

[12]  A. S. Roa,et al.  AgentSpeak(L): BDI agents speak out in a logical computable language , 1996 .

[13]  A. Sadrieh The Alternating Double Auction Market: A Game Theoretic and Experimental Investigation , 1998 .

[14]  Chris Preist,et al.  Commodity trading using an agent-based iterated double auction , 1999, AGENTS '99.

[15]  R. McAfee,et al.  Auctions and Bidding , 1986 .

[16]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Non-monotonic temporal reasoning , 1995 .

[17]  Robert H. Wilson Incentive Efficiency of Double Auctions , 1985 .

[18]  Andrew W. Moore,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: A Survey , 1996, J. Artif. Intell. Res..