Spatiotemporal configuration of memory arrays as a component of VWM representations

Visual working memory (VWM) has been found to support a very limited representation of visual information and yet relatively little is known about the mechanisms that underlie this important cognitive construct. Prior investigations have revealed that VWM performance can be affected by relatively minor changes in the test method as well as the method of encoding. In the present two experiments, we separately investigated these two factors. The results suggest that sequential object displays can improve VWM performance significantly but that a lack of context relatedness between encoding and retrieval impairs performance. This impairment seems to be caused by a mismatch in the spatiotemporal configuration of the memory and test displays, and, importantly, cannot be compensated by selective attention. These findings suggest that spatiotemporal configuration information may be a fundamental component of the information that is stored in VWM as suggested by a number of influential theories.

[1]  B. Wyble,et al.  The simultaneous type, serial token model of temporal attention and working memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[2]  M. Nieuwenstein,et al.  The attentional blink provides episodic distinctiveness: sparing at a cost. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  M. Chun,et al.  Organization of visual short-term memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  A. Hollingworth.  Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Brian McElree,et al.  Accessing Recent Events , 2006 .

[6]  Aimée M. Surprenant,et al.  Principles of Memory , 2009 .

[7]  Claire E. Miller,et al.  Neural Mechanisms Underlying Visual Short-Term Memory Gain for Temporally Distinct Objects. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Hierarchical Encoding in Visual Working Memory , 2010, Psychological science.

[10]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[12]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  A. Baddeley.  The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness , 2003, Vision Research.

[15]  Jonathan I. Flombaum,et al.  Correspondence problems cause repositioning costs in visual working memory , 2012 .

[16]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory , 2005, Nature.

[17]  Catherine Tallon-Baudry,et al.  Relational information in visual short-term memory: the structural gist. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[18]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Method matters: systematic effects of testing procedure on visual working memory sensitivity. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  A. Hollingworth.  Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  W. A. Phillips.  On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory , 1974 .

[21]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[22]  D. Linden,et al.  Improving visual short-term memory by sequencing the stimulus array , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  Lila Davachi,et al.  Are Representations in Working Memory Distinct From Representations in Long-Term Memory? , 2010, Psychological science.

[24]  Rachel S. Sussman,et al.  Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  Won Mok Shim,et al.  Interference from filled delays on visual change detection. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[26]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Are There Multiple Visual Short-Term Memory Stores? , 2008, PloS one.

[27]  J. S. Nairne.  Remembering over the short-term: the case against the standard model. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.