Performance of Large-Volume versus Small-Volume Holding Chambers with Chlorofluorocarbon-Albuterol and Hydrofluoroalkane-Albuterol Sulfate
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] N. Klinger,et al. Proventil HFA provides protection from exercise-induced bronchoconstriction comparable to proventil and ventolin. , 1997, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.
[2] P. Barry,et al. In vitro comparison of the amount of salbutamol available for inhalation from different formulations used with different spacer devices. , 1997, The European respiratory journal.
[3] J. Wildhaber,et al. Electrostatic charge on a plastic spacer device influences the delivery of salbutamol. , 1996, The European respiratory journal.
[4] D. Tashkin,et al. Cumulative dose-response study of non-CFC propellant HFA 134a salbutamol sulfate metered-dose inhaler in patients with asthma. , 1996, Chest.
[5] M Lippmann,et al. Deposition, retention, and clearance of inhaled particles. , 1980, British journal of industrial medicine.
[6] F. Morén. Drug deposition of pressurized inhalation aerosols I. Influence of actuator tube design , 1978 .
[7] J. Wildhaber,et al. Salbutamol delivery from a hydrofluoroalkane pressurized metered-dose inhaler in pediatric ventilator circuits: an in vitro study. , 1998, Chest.
[8] C. O’Callaghan,et al. The Optimum Size and Shape of Spacer Devices for Inhalational Therapy , 1995 .
[9] M. Dolovich,et al. Lung dose, distribution, and clinical response to therapeutic aerosols , 1993 .