Valuation of Decision Flexibility and Strategic Value in Coal Gasification Projects with the Option-To-Switch between Different Outputs

Coal gasification has been promoted as a sophisticated clean energy technology alternative to coal burning these days. Aside from the usual technical difficulties, economic issues of such projects—especially valuation challenges—are important problems that practitioners usually struggle with. This is because of the major extent of managerial flexibility linked with specific characteristics of coal gasification projects, in particular, possibilities to mothball/restart manufacturing lines, or change between different outputs. The value of such flexibilities may be well assessed by real options valuations. The aim of this paper is to show that for the coal gasification technologies the real options valuation is more suitable than traditional discounted cash flow technique. This approach was applied to calculate an integrated plant that can produce either electricity or methanol. As the valuation approach the multiplicative stochastic process was used. As a consequence, binomial lattices of end-product (electricity and methanol) were developed. Then, in regard to them (reference instruments), two corresponding lattices of net cash flows (consecutive instruments) were created. In the end, two trees of switching option value were developed—one for electricity production as an initial mode, and the second for methanol production, delivering expanded net present (strategic) value.

[1]  Hassanudin Mohd Thas Thaker,et al.  An Investigation of an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System to Predict the Relationship among Energy Intensity, Globalization, and Financial Development in Major ASEAN Economies , 2020, Energies.

[2]  Lauri Kujanpää,et al.  Techno-economic Evaluation of Flexible CCS Concepts in a CHP System , 2017 .

[3]  Hayette Gatfaoui Pricing the (European) option to switch between two energy sources: An application to crude oil and natural gas , 2015 .

[4]  Hamed Ghoddusi,et al.  Blending under uncertainty: Real options analysis of ethanol plants and biofuels mandates , 2017 .

[5]  Lin Yang,et al.  Benefit evaluation of investment in CCS retrofitting of coal-fired power plants and PV power plants in China based on real options , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[6]  Luis M. Abadie Operating flexibility at power plants: A market valuation , 2015 .

[7]  R. S. Elias,et al.  Retrofitting carbon capture and storage to natural gas-fired power plants: A real-options approach , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[8]  Teng Yingyue,et al.  Real Option Analysis on Coal-to-oil Project , 2011 .

[9]  Luis M. Abadie,et al.  Valuing flexibility: The case of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle power plant , 2008 .

[10]  Jacek Kamiński,et al.  The prospects for hard coal as a fuel for the Polish power sector , 2010 .

[11]  J. Kaminski,et al.  Coal Demand and Environmental Regulations: A Case Study of the Polish Power Sector , 2020, Energies.

[12]  Luke Reedman,et al.  Using a Real-Options Approach to Model Technology Adoption Under Carbon Price Uncertainty: An Application to the Australian Electricity Generation Sector , 2006 .

[13]  H. Laurikka Option value of gasification technology within an emissions trading scheme , 2006 .

[14]  S. Ross,et al.  Option pricing: A simplified approach☆ , 1979 .

[15]  Dominik Kryzia,et al.  The Valuation of the Operational Flexibility of the Energy Investment Project Based on a Gas-Fired Power Plant , 2020, Energies.

[16]  Hard coal project valuation based on real options approach: multiplicative vs. arithmetic stochastic process , 2016 .

[17]  T. Zhang,et al.  A Techno-economic Assessment of Fuel Switching Options of Addressing Environmental Challenges of Coal-Fired Industrial Boilers: An analytical work for China , 2017 .

[18]  Ehud I. Ronn,et al.  Using the binomial model for the valuation of real options in computing optimal subsidies for Chinese renewable energy investments , 2020 .

[19]  Leonardo Lima Gomes,et al.  Switching outputs in a bioenergy cogeneration project: A real options approach , 2014 .

[20]  F. Black,et al.  The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.