Children's representation of symbolic magnitude: the development of the priming distance effect.

The comparison distance effect (CDE), whereby discriminating between two numbers that are far apart is easier than discriminating between two numbers that are close, has been considered as an important indicator of how people represent magnitudes internally. However, the underlying mechanism of this CDE is still unclear. We tried to shed further light on how people represent magnitudes by using priming. Adults have been shown to exhibit a priming distance effect (PDE), whereby numbers are processed faster when they are preceded by a close number than when they are preceded by a more distant number. Surprisingly, there are no studies available that have investigated this effect in children. The current study examined this effect in typically developing first, third, and fifth graders and in adults. Our findings revealed that the PDE already occurs in first graders and remains stable across development. This study also documents the usefulness of number priming in children, making it an interesting tool for future research.

[1]  E. M. Duncan,et al.  Isolating the effects of symbolic distance, and semantic congruity in comparative judgments: An additive-factors analysis , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[2]  F. Restle.  Speed of Adding and Comparing Numbers. , 1970 .

[3]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: a study of 8–9-year-old students , 2004, Cognition.

[4]  William P. Banks,et al.  Encoding and Processing of Symbolic Information in Comparative Judgments1 , 1977 .

[5]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[6]  Chris Davis,et al.  Tracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: masked priming effects. , 2007, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Imaging unconscious semantic priming , 1998, Nature.

[8]  Laurence Rousselle,et al.  Magnitude representation in children: Its development and dysfunction , 2005 .

[9]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[10]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[11]  John M. Parkman,et al.  Temporal aspects of digit and letter inequality judgments. , 1971, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[12]  D. Ansari.  Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[14]  Jamie I. D. Campbell.  Handbook of mathematical cognition , 2004 .

[15]  B. Butterworth.  The development of arithmetical abilities. , 2005, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[16]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Primed numbers : Exploring the modularity of numerical representations with masked and unmasked semantic priming , 1999 .

[17]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Different magnitude representations in left and right hemisphere: Evidence from the visual half field technique , 2009, Laterality.

[18]  M. Noël,et al.  Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processing , 2007, Cognition.

[19]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Semantic Associations between Signs and Numerical Categories in the Prefrontal Cortex , 2007, PLoS biology.

[20]  Michaël A. Stevens,et al.  A model of exact small-number representation , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[22]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Automatic stimulus-response associations may be semantically mediated , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Domain-specific and domain-general changes in children's development of number comparison. , 2008, Developmental science.

[24]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  Children's Judgments of Numerical Inequality. , 1977 .

[25]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Single-digit and two-digit Arabic numerals address the same semantic number line , 1999, Cognition.

[26]  S. Dehaene,et al.  A Magnitude Code Common to Numerosities and Number Symbols in Human Intraparietal Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[27]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The Organization of Brain Activations in Number Comparison: Event-Related Potentials and the Additive-Factors Method , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.