Simultaneous assessment of the macrobiome and microbiome in a bulk sample of tropical arthropods through DNA metasystematics

Significance Ecological and evolutionary investigations require accurate and high-resolution biodiversity information. Conventional morphological approaches to identifying species in species-rich tropical ecosystems are often unavailable or incapable of timely, cost-effective identification. We show that next-generation sequencing (NGS) of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) DNA barcodes can accurately detect 83.5% of individually sequenced species (corresponding to 91% of individuals) in a bulk sample of terrestrial arthropods from a Costa Rican species-rich site. Additionally, the 16S and 18S ribosomal DNA gene regions obtained also provide an assessment of the bacteria and protozoa in the bulk sample. This metasystematic approach provides the initial infrastructure for a next generation of biodiversity assessment and environmental monitoring. It can lead to more effective understanding, appreciation, and management of complex ecosystems. Conventional assessments of ecosystem sample composition are based on morphology-based or DNA barcode identification of individuals. Both approaches are costly and time-consuming, especially when applied to the large number of specimens and taxa commonly included in ecological investigations. Next-generation sequencing approaches can overcome the bottleneck of individual specimen isolation and identification by simultaneously sequencing specimens of all taxa in a bulk mixture. Here we apply multiple parallel amplification primers, multiple DNA barcode markers, 454-pyrosequencing, and Illumina MiSeq sequencing to the same sample to maximize recovery of the arthropod macrobiome and the bacterial and other microbial microbiome of a bulk arthropod sample. We validate this method with a complex sample containing 1,066 morphologically distinguishable arthropods from a tropical terrestrial ecosystem with high taxonomic diversity. Multiamplicon next-generation DNA barcoding was able to recover sequences corresponding to 91% of the distinguishable individuals in a bulk environmental sample, as well as many species present as undistinguishable tissue. 454-pyrosequencing was able to recover 10 more families of arthropods and 30 more species than did conventional Sanger sequencing of each individual specimen. The use of other loci (16S and 18S ribosomal DNA gene regions) also added the detection of species of microbes associated with these terrestrial arthropods. This method greatly decreases the time and money necessary to perform DNA-based comparisons of biodiversity among ecosystem samples. This methodology opens the door to much cheaper and increased capacity for ecological and evolutionary studies applicable to a wide range of socio-economic issues, as well as a basic understanding of how the world works.

[1]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  BIOINFORMATICS APPLICATIONS NOTE , 2001 .

[2]  K. Christiansen,et al.  Class Collembola Lubbock, 1870. In : Zhang, Z.-Q. (Ed.) Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness , 2011 .

[3]  John Stavrinides,et al.  Insects as alternative hosts for phytopathogenic bacteria. , 2011, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[4]  R. Vrijenhoek,et al.  DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. , 1994, Molecular marine biology and biotechnology.

[5]  D. Janzen,et al.  Cryptic species within cryptic moths: new species of Dunama Schaus (Notodontidae, Nystaleinae) in Costa Rica , 2013, ZooKeys.

[6]  D. Janzen,et al.  Reading the Complex Skipper Butterfly Fauna of One Tropical Place , 2011, PloS one.

[7]  P. Hebert,et al.  bold: The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org) , 2007, Molecular ecology notes.

[8]  M. Crowell,et al.  Human gut microbiota in obesity and after gastric bypass , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Cuong Q. Tang,et al.  The widely used small subunit 18S rDNA molecule greatly underestimates true diversity in biodiversity surveys of the meiofauna , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  J. E. Rawlins,et al.  Integration of DNA barcoding into an ongoing inventory of complex tropical biodiversity , 2009, Molecular ecology resources.

[11]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Image analysis, neural networks, and the taxonomic impediment to biodiversity studies , 1997, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[12]  S. Batzoglou,et al.  Bacterial flora-typing with targeted, chip-based Pyrosequencing , 2007, BMC Microbiology.

[13]  Qing Yang,et al.  Ultra-deep sequencing enables high-fidelity recovery of biodiversity for bulk arthropod samples without PCR amplification , 2013, GigaScience.

[14]  P. Folgarait Leaf-Cutter Ant Parasitoids: Current Knowledge , 2013 .

[15]  Adam Godzik,et al.  Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences , 2006, Bioinform..

[16]  D. Janzen,et al.  DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  S. Hubbard,et al.  Insect endosymbionts: manipulators of insect herbivore trophic interactions? , 2010, Protoplasma.

[18]  John R. Lawrence,et al.  Next-generation sequencing of microbial communities in the Athabasca River 1 and its tributaries in relation to oil sands mining activities 2 3 , 2012 .

[19]  Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al.  The golden age of DNA metasystematics. , 2012, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[20]  Leon Metzeling,et al.  Environmental monitoring using next generation sequencing: rapid identification of macroinvertebrate bioindicator species , 2013, Frontiers in Zoology.

[21]  S. Giovannoni,et al.  Bias caused by template annealing in the amplification of mixtures of 16S rRNA genes by PCR , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[22]  Martin F. Polz,et al.  Bias in Template-to-Product Ratios in Multitemplate PCR , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[23]  C. Currie,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of mutualistic filamentous bacteria associated with fungus-growing ants. , 2005, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[24]  D. Baird,et al.  Environmental Barcoding: A Next-Generation Sequencing Approach for Biomonitoring Applications Using River Benthos , 2011, PloS one.

[25]  Robert A. Edwards,et al.  Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets , 2011, Bioinform..

[26]  Sujeevan Ratnasingham,et al.  Molecular analysis of parasitoid linkages (MAPL): gut contents of adult parasitoid wasps reveal larval host , 2011, Molecular ecology.

[27]  S. Schuster,et al.  Integrative analysis of environmental sequences using MEGAN4. , 2011, Genome research.

[28]  R. Giblin-Davis,et al.  Ultrasequencing of the meiofaunal biosphere: practice, pitfalls and promises , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[29]  M. Turelli,et al.  Facilitating Wolbachia introductions into mosquito populations through insecticide-resistance selection , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  E. Wilson,et al.  The Barometer of Life , 2010, Science.

[31]  T. Glenn Field guide to next‐generation DNA sequencers , 2011, Molecular ecology resources.

[32]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Biodiversity soup: metabarcoding of arthropods for rapid biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring , 2012 .

[33]  L. Prendini Order Thelyphonida Latreille, 1804. In: Zhang, Z.-Q. (Ed.) Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness , 2011 .

[34]  K. Christiansen,et al.  Class Collembola Lubbock, 1870. , 2011 .

[35]  J. Bunge,et al.  Polymerase chain reaction primers miss half of rRNA microbial diversity , 2009, The ISME Journal.

[36]  Jeremy R. deWaard,et al.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Philip Hugenholtz,et al.  A renaissance for the pioneering 16S rRNA gene. , 2008, Current opinion in microbiology.

[38]  Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al.  Next‐generation sequencing technologies for environmental DNA research , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[39]  Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al.  Assessing biodiversity of a freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate community through non-destructive environmental barcoding of DNA from preservative ethanol , 2012, BMC Ecology.

[40]  V. Ranwez,et al.  A new versatile primer set targeting a short fragment of the mitochondrial COI region for metabarcoding metazoan diversity: application for characterizing coral reef fish gut contents , 2013, Frontiers in Zoology.

[41]  Rob Knight,et al.  UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection , 2011, Bioinform..

[42]  John L. Spouge,et al.  Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al.  Next-generation DNA barcoding: using next-generation sequencing to enhance and accelerate DNA barcode capture from single specimens , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.

[44]  D. Janzen,et al.  Wolbachia and DNA Barcoding Insects: Patterns, Potential, and Problems , 2012, PloS one.

[45]  Zhi-qiang Zhang Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness (COVER) , 2011 .

[46]  Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al.  Biomonitoring 2.0: a new paradigm in ecosystem assessment made possible by next‐generation DNA sequencing , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[47]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  Kristine N. Stewart,et al.  Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas , 2012, Nature.

[49]  Marcel Martin Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads , 2011 .

[50]  D. Wall,et al.  Molecular profiling of soil animal diversity in natural ecosystems: Incongruence of molecular and morphological results , 2009 .

[51]  H. T. Gier THE MORPHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR OF THE INTRACELLULAR BACTEROIDS OF ROACHES , 1936 .

[52]  J. B. Schmidt,et al.  Arthropod Diversity in a Tropical Forest , 2012, Science.

[53]  G. Casella,et al.  Pyrosequencing enumerates and contrasts soil microbial diversity , 2007, The ISME Journal.

[54]  C. Moreau,et al.  Bacterial Infections across the Ants: Frequency and Prevalence of Wolbachia, Spiroplasma, and Asaia , 2013 .

[55]  W. John Kress,et al.  A DNA barcode for land plants , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  P. Hebert,et al.  Recovery of the mitochondrial COI barcode region in diverse Hexapoda through tRNA-based primers , 2010, BMC Genomics.

[57]  Brandon J. Laforest,et al.  Insights into biodiversity sampling strategies for freshwater microinvertebrate faunas through bioblitz campaigns and DNA barcoding , 2013, BMC Ecology.