Interpreting complex, three-dimensional, near-surface GPR surveys: an integrated modelling and inversion approach

With the increasing computational power of modern personal computers, sophisticated modelling and inversion techniques are becoming popular tools for the interpretation of high-resolution, fully three-dimensional GPR surveys. In this paper, we present the latest results of ongoing practical research into the development of novel, integrated, finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) numerical modelling and linear tomographic inversion methods for the interpretation and analysis of near–surface, 3D GPR data. The proposed approach utilizes the Born approximation solution to the inverse-scattering problem and a truncated singular value decomposition (TSVD) to create the final, inverted reconstructions. A three-dimensional, full-field, O(2,4) accurate FDTD modelling scheme is used to generate the numerical-based Green’s functions and incident fields for the inversion. As such, accurate antenna sources (including the influence of shields) and near-field air/ground interface effects are inherently included in the inversion formulation. The performance of this integrated method is evaluated via a simulated, 3D, forensic-based, test-case example (a 900 MHz survey over a clandestine human burial target) including coherent noise from near-surface clutter. Although the example is simplistic, the results show that the scheme works well, despite some assumptions in the inversion methodology. As such, useful information can be gained on the true form, depth, location and spatial interrelationships of the buried features and, therefore, improved interpretations can be obtained in a three-dimensional context.

[1]  Francesco Soldovieri,et al.  Early-stage leaking pipes GPR monitoring via microwave tomographic inversion , 2009 .

[2]  Combined high-resolution magnetics and GPR surveys of the roman town of Flavia Solva , 2004 .

[3]  N. J. Cassidy,et al.  Optimising GPR modelling: A practical, multi-threaded approach to 3D FDTD numerical modelling , 2010, Comput. Geosci..

[4]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Computational Electrodynamics the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 1995 .

[5]  N. Cassidy,et al.  Time‐Lapse Geophysical Investigations over a Simulated Urban Clandestine Grave * , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[6]  Mario Bertero,et al.  Introduction to Inverse Problems in Imaging , 1998 .

[7]  Francesco Soldovieri,et al.  Analysis of the distorted Born approximation for subsurface reconstruction: truncation and uncertainties effects , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Francesco Soldovieri,et al.  BISTATIC TOMOGRAPHIC GPR IMAGING FOR INCIPIENT PIPELINE LEAKAGE EVALUATION , 2010 .

[9]  Robert S. Freeland,et al.  Forensic Application of FM-CW and Pulse Radar , 2003 .

[10]  Henryk Marcak,et al.  Geotechnical analysis and 4D GPR measurements for the assessment of the risk of sinkholes occurring in a Polish mining area , 2008 .

[11]  G. Leone,et al.  A linear inverse scattering algorithm for realistic GPR applications , 2007 .

[12]  J. Hugenschmidt,et al.  The inspection of large retaining walls using GPR , 2007, 2007 4th International Workshop on, Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar.

[13]  Harry M. Jol,et al.  Ground penetrating radar : theory and applications , 2009 .

[14]  Michael Lee,et al.  Advanced signal analysis for forensic applications of ground penetrating radar , 2004, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Grounds Penetrating Radar, 2004. GPR 2004..

[15]  Melinda Piket-May,et al.  9 – Computational Electromagnetics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 2005 .

[16]  Alexander Yarovoy,et al.  Chapter 14 – Landmine and Unexploded Ordnance Detection and Classification with Ground Penetrating Radar , 2009 .

[17]  G. McMechan,et al.  Forensic GPR: finite-difference simulations of responses from buried human remains , 2000 .

[18]  C. Balanis Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics , 1989 .

[19]  D. Goodman Chapter 15 – GPR Archaeometry , 2009 .

[20]  F. Soldovieri,et al.  Advanced forward modeling and tomographic inversion for leaking water pipes monitoring , 2007, 2007 4th International Workshop on, Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar.

[21]  K. Yee Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell's equations in isotropic media , 1966 .

[22]  Nigel J. Cassidy,et al.  A review of practical numerical modelling methods for the advanced interpretation of ground-penetrating radar in near-surface environments , 2007 .

[23]  J. Robertsson,et al.  Finite‐difference modeling of electromagnetic wave propagation in dispersive and attenuating media , 1998 .