A methodology for aligning raster flow direction data with photogrammetrically mapped hydrology

The requirement to digitally delineate accurate watershed boundaries is a routine task necessary in numerous natural science disciplines. The base topographic data necessary for watershed analysis in many jurisdictions is typically contained within two primary photogrammetrically interpreted base topographic layers: the hydrology (streams, rivers, wetlands, lakes, etc.), and the elevation (contours, spots, digital terrain model points, etc.). From these two data sources, a flow direction corrected, single line, vector hydrology network and a raster digital elevation model can be developed. There are numerous approaches to watershed delineation, but the most accurate implementations employ both these enhanced data sets in extracting watershed divides. A popular method to increase the accuracy of extracted watershed boundaries is to utilize that hydrology network to post-condition the digital elevation model, thus ensuring the local topography honours the stream network. This process is known as stream burning. This paper outlines an alternative approach to accomplish a similar objective. The outlined approach unambiguously translates the topological relationships within the vector hydrology layers directly into a raster flow direction grid. Initial testing of this methodology has shown several accuracy and processing advantages for extracting watershed boundaries.

[1]  L. Martz,et al.  Network and Subwatershed Parameters Extracted From Digital Elevation Models , 1993 .

[2]  D. Maidment,et al.  A GIS assessment of nonpoint source pollution in the San Antonio-Nueces coastal basin , 1996 .

[3]  M. Hutchinson A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits , 1989 .

[4]  R. Young,et al.  AGNPS: A nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds , 1989 .

[5]  D. Tarboton A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models , 1997 .

[6]  S. Aronoff Geographic Information Systems: A Management Perspective , 1989 .

[7]  John F. O'Callaghan,et al.  The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[8]  David R. Maidment,et al.  Modeling agrichemical transport in midwest rivers using geographic information systems , 1996 .

[9]  Michael J. Oimoen,et al.  The National Elevation Dataset , 2002 .

[10]  C. Chang,et al.  Ontario Flow Assessment Techniques (OFAT) , 2002 .

[11]  D. Maidment,et al.  Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling Support with Geographic Information Systems , 2000 .

[12]  L. Band Topographic Partition of Watersheds with Digital Elevation Models , 1986 .

[13]  H. Veregin The Effects of Vertical Error in Digital Elevation Models on the Determination of Flow-path Direction , 1997 .

[14]  S. K. Jenson,et al.  Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information-system analysis , 1988 .

[15]  D. Maidment Arc hydro : GIS for water resources , 2002 .