Sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction of low-dose chest CT: effect on image quality and radiation dose.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) and filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction of chest CT acquired with 65% radiation dose reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this prospective study involving 24 patients (11 women and 13 men; mean [± SD] age, 66 ± 10 years), two scan series were acquired using 100 and 40 Quality Reference mAs over a 10-cm scan length in the chest with a 128-MDCT scanner. The 40 Quality Reference mAs CT projection data were reconstructed with FBP and four settings of SAFIRE (S1, S2, S3, and S4). Six image datasets (FBP with 100 and 40 Quality Reference mAs, and S1, S2, S3, S4 with 40 Quality Reference mAs) were displayed on a DICOM-compliant 55-inch 2-megapixel monitor for blinded evaluation by two thoracic radiologists for number and location of lesions, lesion size, lesion margins, visibility of small structures and fissures, and diagnostic confidence. Objective noise and CT values were measured in thoracic aorta for each image series, and the noise power spectrum was assessed. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. RESULTS. All 186 lesions were seen on 40 Quality Reference mAs SAFIRE images. Diagnostic confidence on SAFIRE images was higher than that for FBP images. Except for the minor blotchy appearance on SAFIRE settings S3 and S4, no significant artifacts were noted. Objective noise with 40 Quality Reference mAs S1 images (21.1 ± 6.1 SD of HU) was significantly lower than that for 40 Quality Reference mAs FBP images (28.5 ± 8.1 SD of HU) (p < 0.001). Noise power spectra were identical for SAFIRE and FBP with progressive noise reduction with higher iteration SAFIRE settings. CONCLUSION. Iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) allows reducing the radiation exposure by approximately 65% without losing diagnostic information in chest CT.

[1]  Cynthia M. McCollough,et al.  Projection space denoising with bilateral filtering and CT noise modeling for dose reduction in CT. , 2009, Medical physics.

[2]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Comparison of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis. , 2004, Radiology.

[3]  Nils Dahlström,et al.  Radiation Dose Reduction With Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Abdominal Computed Tomography , 2012, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  P Suortti,et al.  Radiation dose and image quality in K-edge subtraction computed tomography of lung in vivo. , 2014, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[5]  J. Valentin,et al.  Abstract: Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures, ICRP Publication 85 , 2000 .

[6]  E. Samei,et al.  Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm--initial clinical experience. , 2010, Radiology.

[7]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Diffuse lung disease: CT of the chest with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. , 2010, Radiology.

[8]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Chest CT performed with z-axis modulation: scanning protocol and radiation dose. , 2005, Radiology.

[9]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. , 2011, Radiology.

[10]  Brent P Little,et al.  Dose tracking and dose auditing in a comprehensive computed tomography dose-reduction program. , 2014, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[11]  T. Rochat,et al.  Image quality of low mA CT pulmonary angiography reconstructed with model based iterative reconstruction versus standard CT pulmonary angiography reconstructed with filtered back projection: an equivalency trial , 2015, European Radiology.

[12]  Rainer Martin,et al.  Noise power spectral density estimation based on optimal smoothing and minimum statistics , 2001, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[13]  M. Kalra,et al.  What is the minimal radiation dose that can be used for detecting pleural effusion? , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  M. Kalra,et al.  Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. , 2004, Radiology.

[15]  Giang Nguyen,et al.  A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential , 2011, European Radiology.

[17]  H. Tiddens,et al.  Novel Outcome Measures for Clinical Trials in Cystic Fibrosis , 2014, Pediatric pulmonology.

[18]  G. Murtaza,et al.  Current and Future Lymphatic Imaging Modalities for Tumor Staging , 2014, BioMed research international.

[19]  M. Kalra,et al.  Radiation dose optimization and thoracic computed tomography. , 2014, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[20]  Atul Padole,et al.  Submillisievert chest CT with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction techniques. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  Investigation of iterative image reconstruction in low-dose breast CT , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  E Godehardt,et al.  [Dose reduction and image quality in MDCT of the upper abdomen: potential of an adaptive post-processing filter]. , 2010, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[23]  Dag Rune Olsen,et al.  Improved image quality of low‐dose thoracic CT examinations with a new postprocessing software† , 2010, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[24]  M. Kalra,et al.  Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. , 2004, Radiology.

[25]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. , 2010, Radiology.

[26]  Myeong-Jin Kim,et al.  Intraindividual Comparison of Diagnostic Performance in Patients With Hepatic Metastasis of Full-Dose Standard and Half-Dose Iterative Reconstructions With Dual-Source Abdominal Computed Tomography , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[27]  Mannudeep K. Kalra,et al.  Automatic exposure control in CT: applications and limitations. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[28]  Nancy A Obuchowski,et al.  Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  M F McNitt-Gray,et al.  Application of the noise power spectrum in modern diagnostic MDCT: part I. Measurement of noise power spectra and noise equivalent quanta , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  James L Mulshine,et al.  Lung cancer screening. , 2005, The oncologist.