A mulTi-noRmalization mUlti-distance aSsessmenT (TRUST) approach for locating a battery swapping station for electric scooters

Abstract Due to high popularity of electric scooters, cities with high population have faced challenges regarding establishment of battery swapping stations (BSS) along populated areas of the urban districts. However, locating a BSS in a big city is a multi-dimensional problem which require reliable tools to efficiently address. This paper proposes a novel robust decision-making tool, named mulTi-noRmalization mUlti-distance aSsessmenT (TRUST), to tackle location selection problem for BSS considering sustainability criteria. The proposed approach applies a multi-normalization procedure using three linear normalization techniques, logarithmic-normalization, and constraint-based normalization which are integrated through an aggregation operator. Then, Euclidean, Manhattan, Lorentzian, and Pearson distance measures are used to determine distance of alternatives from the negative ideal solution in order to calculate the final score. Advantages of the proposed approach are consideration of a multi-normalization algorithm to minimize subjectivity in normalized data, consideration of constraint-based normalization technique to ensure that specific standards, and utilization of four distance measures through a two-stage process to determine a relative distance score. To show the feasibility and applicability of the new approach, a real-life case study is investigated to locate a BSS in Istanbul. Results show that the best alternative is Beyoglu for locating a BSS for electric scooters.

[1]  Dragan Pamucar,et al.  The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani,et al.  A VIKOR and TOPSIS focused reanalysis of the MADM methods based on logarithmic normalization , 2020, ArXiv.

[3]  Hrvoje Pandzic,et al.  Electric vehicle battery swapping station: Business case and optimization model , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE).

[4]  Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee,et al.  A NEW COMBINATIVE DISTANCE-BASED ASSESSMENT(CODAS) METHOD FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING , 2016 .

[5]  Hamid R. Sayarshad,et al.  An intelligent method for dynamic distribution of electric taxi batteries between charging and swapping stations , 2020 .

[6]  S. Cha,et al.  Taxonomy of nominal type histogram distance measures , 2008 .

[7]  Samson Shenglong Yu,et al.  A unified configurational optimization framework for battery swapping and charging stations considering electric vehicle uncertainty , 2021 .

[8]  L. Brown,et al.  Injury rates per mile of travel for electric scooters versus motor vehicles. , 2020, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[9]  Xiangqian Zhu,et al.  Dynamic operation model of the battery swapping station for EV (electric vehicle) in electricity market , 2014 .

[10]  H. Oliver Gao,et al.  Non-myopic dynamic routing of electric taxis with battery swapping stations , 2020 .

[11]  P. Alpkokin,et al.  Sustainable urban mobility in Istanbul: Challenges and prospects , 2020 .

[12]  Kangyin Dong,et al.  Have electric vehicles effectively addressed CO2 emissions? Analysis of eight leading countries using quantile-on-quantile regression approach , 2021, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[13]  R. Noland,et al.  Spatial associations of dockless shared e-scooter usage , 2020, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[14]  Liwei Ju,et al.  Optimizing electric vehicle users’ charging behavior in battery swapping mode , 2015 .

[15]  Zuo-Jun Max Shen,et al.  Infrastructure Planning for Electric Vehicles with Battery Swapping , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Optimal Siting of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Using Pythagorean Fuzzy VIKOR Approach , 2018, Mathematical Problems in Engineering.

[17]  Abdelkrim Abdelli,et al.  Dealing with value constraints in decision making using MCDM methods , 2020, J. Comput. Sci..

[18]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  Akshay Kumar Rathore,et al.  A review on barrier and challenges of electric vehicle in India and vehicle to grid optimisation , 2021 .

[20]  Huiru Zhao,et al.  Optimal site selection of electric vehicle charging station by using fuzzy TOPSIS based on sustainability perspective , 2015 .

[21]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) , 2015, Informatica.

[22]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-attribute Assessment of Road Design Solutions by Using the COPRAS Method , 2007 .

[23]  Çağlar Karamaşa,et al.  Comparative assessment of social sustainability performance: Integrated data-driven weighting system and CoCoSo model , 2021 .

[24]  Chen-Yang Cheng,et al.  Location optimization for multiple types of charging stations for electric scooters , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[25]  Xi Chen,et al.  A Monte Carlo Simulation Approach to Evaluate Service Capacities of EV Charging and Battery Swapping Stations , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[26]  Ming-Der Yang,et al.  Optimized allocation of scooter battery swapping station under demand uncertainty , 2021 .

[27]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy , 2006 .

[28]  W. Green,et al.  Recharging systems and business operations to improve the economics of electrified taxi fleets , 2020, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[29]  Su Xiu Xu,et al.  A novel multi-criteria decision-making method for selecting the site of an electric-vehicle charging station from a sustainable perspective , 2021 .

[30]  Abdelkrim Abdelli,et al.  ISOCOV: a new MCDM method to handle value constraints in Web service selection , 2019, 2019 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC).

[31]  Liu Yiqi,et al.  Optimal scheduling for electric vehicle battery swapping-charging system based on nanogrids , 2021 .

[32]  Walid Serrai,et al.  How to deal with QoS value constraints in MCDM based Web service selection , 2019, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[33]  R. Danielis,et al.  The characteristics of the demand for electric scooters in Italy: An exploratory study , 2021 .

[34]  V. K. Manupati,et al.  A multi-criteria decision making approach for the urban renewal in Southern India , 2018, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[35]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making , 2010 .

[36]  Junfeng Jiao,et al.  Understanding the Shared E-scooter Travels in Austin, TX , 2020, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[37]  Hua Cai,et al.  Configuration and system operation for battery swapping stations in Beijing , 2021 .

[38]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  An integrated decision-making model for supplier evaluation in public healthcare system: the case study of a Spanish hospital , 2020, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[39]  MengChu Zhou,et al.  Centralized Charging Strategy and Scheduling Algorithm for Electric Vehicles Under a Battery Swapping Scenario , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[40]  Fengyun Li,et al.  Study on location decision framework of electric vehicle battery swapping station: Using a hybrid MCDM method , 2020 .

[41]  Wojciech Sałabun,et al.  Multicriteria Approach to Sustainable Transport Evaluation under Incomplete Knowledge: Electric Bikes Case Study , 2019, Sustainability.

[42]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS) , 2020, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[43]  Kuang-Chong Wu,et al.  Influences and uncertainty of battery-swapping electric scooters on energy system in Taiwan , 2018, Energy Procedia.

[44]  Hao Wu,et al.  An Optimization Model for Electric Vehicle Battery Charging at a Battery Swapping Station , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[45]  Hrvoje Pandzic,et al.  Optimal Operation and Services Scheduling for an Electric Vehicle Battery Swapping Station , 2015 .

[46]  Aouag Hichem,et al.  Benchmarking framework for sustainable manufacturing based MCDM techniques , 2021 .

[47]  Johnhenri R. Richardson,et al.  Autonomous battery swapping system for small-scale helicopters , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[48]  B. B. Zaidan,et al.  Multidimensional Benchmarking Framework for AQMs of Network Congestion Control Based on AHP and Group-TOPSIS , 2021, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[49]  Shaoyong Guo,et al.  A Mobile Battery Swapping Service for Electric Vehicles Based on a Battery Swapping Van , 2017 .

[50]  Larisa Dobryakova,et al.  How to choose the optimal single-track vehicle to move in the city? Electric scooters study case , 2020, KES.

[51]  Edmundas Kazimieras ZAVADSKAS,et al.  MACONT: Mixed Aggregation by Comprehensive Normalization Technique for Multi-Criteria Analysis , 2020, Informatica.

[52]  Selman Karagoz,et al.  A novel intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM-based CODAS approach for locating an authorized dismantling center: a case study of Istanbul , 2020, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[53]  Caiqing Zhang,et al.  Economic benefit analysis of battery charging and swapping station for pure electric bus based on differential power purchase policy: a new power trading model , 2021 .

[54]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems , 2019, Management Decision.