Kinetic and kinematic differences between deadlifts and goodmornings

BackgroundIn order to improve training performance, as well as avoid overloading during prevention and rehabilitation exercises in patients, the aim of this study was to understand the biomechanical differences in the knee, hip and the back between the exercises “Goodmornings” (GMs) and “Deadlifts” (DLs).MethodsThe kinetics and kinematics of 13 subjects, performing GMs and DLs with an additional 25% (GMs), 25% and 50% (DLs) body weight (BW) on the barbell were analysed. Using the kinetic and kinematic data captured using a 3D motion analysis and force plates, an inverse approach with a quasi-static solution was used to calculate the sagittal moments and angles in the knee, hip and the trunk. The maximum moments and joint angles were statistically tested using ANOVA with a Bonferroni adjustment.ResultsThe observed maximal flexion angle of the knee was 5.3 ± 6.7° for GMs and 107.8 ± 22.4° and 103.4 ± 22.6° for DLs with 25% and 50% BW respectively. Of the hip, the maximal flexion angle was 25% smaller during GMs compared to DLs. No difference in kinematics of the trunk between the two exercises was observed. For DLs, the resulting sagittal moment in the knee was an external flexion moment, whereas during GMs an external extension moment was present. Importantly, no larger sagittal knee joint moments were observed when using a heavier weight on the barbell during DLs, but higher sagittal moments were found at the hip and L4/L5. Compared to GMs, DLs produced a lower sagittal moment at the hip using 25% BW while generating the same sagittal moment at L4/L5.ConclusionsThe two exercises exhibited different motion patterns for the lower extremities but not for the trunk. To strengthen the hip while including a large range of motion, DLs using 50% BW should be chosen. Due to their ability to avoid knee flexion or a knee flexion moment, GMs should be preferentially chosen over DLs as ACL rupture prevention exercises. Here, in order to shift the hamstring to quadriceps ratio towards the hamstrings, GMs should be favoured ahead of DLs using 50% BW before DLs using 25% BW.

[1]  M. Reiman,et al.  The role and implementation of eccentric training in athletic rehabilitation: tendinopathy, hamstring strains, and acl reconstruction. , 2011, International journal of sports physical therapy.

[2]  Nicola Phillips MSc Mcsp Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning , 1997 .

[3]  Barry D. Wilson,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of the Deadlift , 1996 .

[4]  R. Norman,et al.  1986 Volvo Award in Biomechanics: Partitioning of the L4 - L5 Dynamic Moment into Disc, Ligamentous, and Muscular Components During Lifting , 1986, Spine.

[5]  A. Hof,et al.  An explicit expression for the moment in multibody systems. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  E. Brown,et al.  Kinematics and kinetics of the dead lift in adolescent power lifters. , 1985, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  K. An,et al.  Comparison of tibiofemoral joint forces during open-kinetic-chain and closed-kinetic-chain exercises. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  R W Norman,et al.  Lumbar spine loads during the lifting of extremely heavy weights. , 1991, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  D. Carpenter,et al.  Low back strengthening for the prevention and treatment of low back pain. , 1999, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  J Cholewicki,et al.  Lumbar posterior ligament involvement during extremely heavy lifts estimated from fluoroscopic measurements. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  William J Kraemer,et al.  Resistance training for health and performance , 2002, Current sports medicine reports.

[12]  E Y Chao,et al.  Kinetic Chain Exercise in Knee Rehabilitation , 1991, Sports medicine.

[13]  R F Escamilla,et al.  A three-dimensional biomechanical analysis of sumo and conventional style deadlifts. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  T Hansson,et al.  The Loads on the Lumbar Spine During Extreme Weight Lifting , 1987, Spine.

[15]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Kinetics of Human Motion , 2002 .

[16]  W. Ebben Hamstring activation during lower body resistance training exercises. , 2009, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[17]  Angus Burnett,et al.  Back Stress and Assistance Exercises in Weightlifting , 2002 .

[18]  R W Norman,et al.  Effects of an anatomically detailed erector spinae model on L4/L5 disc compression and shear. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  R F Escamilla,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of the deadlift during the 1999 Special Olympics World Games. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  V. M. Zat︠s︡iorskiĭ,et al.  Science and practice of strength training , 1995 .

[21]  M Nissan,et al.  Dimensions of human lumbar vertebrae in the sagittal plane. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Ioannis Agouris,et al.  A Biomechanical Analysis of Straight and Hexagonal Barbell Deadlifts Using Submaximal Loads , 2011, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[23]  S M Howell Comparison of closed and open kinetic chain exercise in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. , 1993, The American journal of sports medicine.

[24]  Silvio Lorenzetti,et al.  Comparison of the Angles and Corresponding Moments in the Knee and Hip During Restricted and Unrestricted Squats , 2012, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[25]  R. List,et al.  Kinematics of the Trunk and the Lower Extremities During Restricted and Unrestricted Squats , 2013, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[26]  G. Haff,et al.  Isometric Strength of Powerlifters in Key Positions of the Conventional Deadlift , 2012 .

[27]  Xavier García-Massó,et al.  Technique and Safety Aspects of Resistance Exercises: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2009, The Physician and sportsmedicine.

[28]  M. Guadagnoli,et al.  EFFECT OF HAMSTRING‐EMPHASIZED RESISTANCE TRAINING ON HAMSTRING: QUADRICEPS STRENGTH RATIOS , 2007, Journal of strength and conditioning research.