Involuntary strategy-dependent dual task performance
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Pierre Jolicœur,et al. All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon , 2002, Psychological research.
[2] D. Allport,et al. On the Division of Attention: A Disproof of the Single Channel Hypothesis , 1972, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[3] Eliot Hazeltine,et al. Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[4] Roy Luria,et al. Increased Control Demand Results in Serial Processing , 2005, Psychological science.
[5] P. Jolicoeur,et al. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[6] Dario D. Salvucci,et al. Threaded cognition: an integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. , 2008, Psychological review.
[7] Meta Bowman,et al. About the Division , 2013 .
[8] Jennifer M. Glass,et al. Virtually Perfect Time Sharing in Dual-Task Performance: Uncorking the Central Cognitive Bottleneck , 2001, Psychological science.
[9] Hillary D. Schwarb,et al. Investigating the modality specificity of response selection using a temporal flanker task , 2011, Psychological research.
[10] H. Pashler. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.
[11] Torsten Schubert,et al. Processing differences between simple and choice reactions affect bottleneck localization in overlapping tasks , 1999 .
[12] Welford At. An apparatus for use in studying serial performance. , 1952 .
[13] R. Remington,et al. The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.
[14] H. Pashler,et al. Is dual-task slowing instruction dependent? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[15] Ritske de Jong,et al. Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance , 1993 .
[16] Uri Feintuch,et al. Visual Attention and Coactivation of Response Decisions for Features from Different Dimensions , 2002 .
[17] M. D’Esposito,et al. The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study , 2006, Psychological research.
[18] D. Kahneman,et al. Attention and Effort , 1973 .
[19] R. D. Gordon,et al. Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. , 2001, Psychological review.
[20] J. C. Johnston,et al. Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference , 1992 .
[21] A. Cohen,et al. Modularity beyond perception: evidence from the PRP paradigm. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[22] D E Kieras,et al. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.
[23] A. Cohen,et al. Modularity beyond perception: Evidence from single task interference paradigms , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.
[24] J. Danckert. Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance XIX Wolfgang Prinz, Bernhard Hommel (Eds.), Oxford University Press, 2002, Price: £ 65.00, ISBN: 0-19-851069 , 2003, Neuropsychologia.
[25] Jennifer M. Glass,et al. Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. , 1999 .
[26] M. C. Smith,et al. Theories of the psychological refractory period. , 1967, Psychological bulletin.
[27] Torsten Schubert,et al. Neural mechanisms of concurrent stimulus processing in dual tasks , 2009, NeuroImage.
[28] David E. Kieras,et al. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .
[29] T. Leahey,et al. Learning and cognition , 1993 .
[30] Uri Feintuch,et al. Visual attention and coactivation of response decisions for features from different dimensions. , 2002, Psychological science.
[31] Harold Pashler,et al. Is dual-task slowing instruction dependent? , 2001 .
[32] J. C. Johnston,et al. Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference , 1992 .
[33] R. D. de Jong,et al. Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[34] Asher Cohen,et al. Perceptual Dimensional Constraints in Response Selection Processes , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.
[35] A. Welford. An apparatus for use in studying serial performance. , 1952, American Journal of Psychology.
[36] E. Hazeltine,et al. Modality pairing effects and the response selection bottleneck , 2006, Psychological Research.
[37] P. Jolicoeur,et al. Decision and Response in Dual-Task Interference , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.
[38] Iring Koch,et al. The role of input–output modality compatibility in task switching , 2011, Psychological research.
[39] J. C. Johnston,et al. Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. , 1998 .
[40] H. Pashler,et al. Close binding of identity and location in visual feature perception. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[41] J. Wolfe. Visual search in continuous, naturalistic stimuli , 1994, Vision Research.
[42] B. Hommel. Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[43] Walter Schneider,et al. Controlled & automatic processing: behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms , 2003, Cogn. Sci..
[44] H. Pashler. The Psychology of Attention , 1997 .
[45] P. Bertelson. Central Intermittency Twenty Years Later * , 1966, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.