Comparison Between Impact Factor, Eigenfactor Metrics, and SCimago Journal Rank Indicator of Pediatric Neurology Journals

Background: Impact Factor (IF) as a major journal quality indicator has a series of shortcomings including effect of self-citation, review articles, total number of articles, etc. In this study, we compared 4 journals quality indices ((IF), Eigenfactor Score (ES), Article Influence Score (AIS) and SCImago Journal Rank indicator (SJR)) in the specific Pediatric Neurology journals. Methods: All ISI and Scopus indexed specific Pediatric Neurology journals were compared regarding their 2011 IF, ES, AIS and SJR. Results: Fourteen pediatric Neurology journals were identified, 3 of which were only Scopus indexed and the others were both ISI and Scopus indexed. High correlation was found between IF and AIS (0.850). Correlations between IF and other indices were not that high. Self-citation, total article number and review articles were related to the IF and other indices as well as their ranks. English language and citation to non citable item didn’t have any effect on pediatric neurology journals ranks. Conclusion: Although all the above mentioned indicators can be used interchangeably, using all considered indices is a more appropriate way than using only IF for quality assessment of pediatric neurology journals.

[1]  Ted Brown,et al.  Quality Metrics : Options to Consider Other Than Impact Factors , 2011 .

[2]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  The Eigenfactor™ Metrics , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Richard M. Smith,et al.  Commentary: the power of the unrelenting impact factor--is it a force for good or harm? , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[4]  D. Sin,et al.  Integrative Approach to Quality Assessment of Medical Journals Using Impact Factor, Eigenfactor, and Article Influence Scores , 2010, PloS one.

[5]  Mohamed L Elsaie,et al.  IMPACTITIS: THE IMPACT FACTOR MYTH SYNDROME , 2009, Indian journal of dermatology.

[6]  E. Garfield.  Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. , 1972, Science.

[7]  E. Garfield.  The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. , 2006, JAMA.

[8]  Andrzej K. Wróblewski,et al.  A commentary on misuses of the impact factor , 2008, Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis.

[9]  M. Motamed,et al.  Self citations and impact factors in otolaryngology journals. , 2002, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[10]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Assessing citations with the Eigenfactor™ Metrics , 2008, Neurology.

[11]  Frank-Thorsten Krell,et al.  The Journal Impact Factor as a performance indicator , 2012 .

[12]  P. Seglen,et al.  Education and debate , 1999, The Ethics of Public Health.

[13]  Izet Masic,et al.  The Importance of Proper Citation of References in Biomedical Articles , 2013, Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH.

[14]  Ricardo Arencibia-Jorge,et al.  Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor , 2008, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[15]  A. Gasparyan.  Thoughts on impact factors and editing of medical journals. , 2010, Inflammation & allergy drug targets.

[16]  Armen Yuri Gasparyan,et al.  Biomedical journal editing: elements of success , 2011, Croatian medical journal.

[17]  S. Ramin,et al.  Comparison between Impact factor, SCImago journal rank indicator and Eigenfactor score of nuclear medicine journals. , 2012, Nuclear medicine review. Central & Eastern Europe.

[18]  Andy R Weale,et al.  The level of non-citation of articles within a journal as a measure of quality: a comparison to the impact factor , 2004, BMC medical research methodology.