The Precautionary Principle in Contemporary Environmental Politics

In its restless metamorphosis, the environmental movement captures ideas and transforms them into principles, guidelines and points of leverage. Sustainability is one such idea, now being reinterpreted in the aftermath of the 1992 Rio Conference. So too is the precautionary principle. Like sustainability, the precautionary principle is neither a well defined principle nor a stable concept. It has become the repository for a jumble of adventurous beliefs that challenge the status quo of political power, ideology and civil rights. Neither concept has much coherence other than it is captured by the spirit that is challenging the authority of science, the hegemony of cost-benefit analysis, the powerlessness of victims of environmental abuse, and the unimplemented ethics of intrinsic natural rights and inter-generational equity. It is because the mood of the times needs an organising idea that the precautionary principle is getting a fair wind. However, unless its advocates sharpen up their understanding of the term, the precautionary principle may not establish the influence it deserves. Its future looks promising but it is not assured.

[1]  A. Jordan,et al.  The Precautionary Principle in UK Environmental Law and Policy , 1995 .

[2]  A. Jordan.  Paying the Incremental Costs of Global Environmental Protection: The Evolving Role of Gef , 1994 .

[3]  D. Pearce,et al.  Economic Values and the Natural World , 1995 .

[4]  Alec M. Gallup,et al.  Of Global Concern: Results of the Health of the Planet Survey. , 1993 .

[5]  A. Jordan.  Integrated pollution control and the evolving style and structure of environmental regulation in the UK , 1993 .

[6]  Wolfgang Sachs,et al.  Global ecology: a new arena of political conflict , 1994 .

[7]  M. Hulme,et al.  Exploring the links between Desertification and Climate Change , 1993 .

[8]  Michael Redclift,et al.  Sustainable Development: Needs, Values, Rights , 1993, Environmental Values.

[9]  J. Clark,et al.  Reasonable creatures: rights and rationalities in valuing the countryside , 1993 .

[10]  K. Brown,et al.  Valuing biodiversity : the scope and limitations of economic analysis , 1993 .

[11]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Environmental Economics: An Elementary Introduction , 1993 .

[12]  Robert Costanza,et al.  The 4P Approach to Dealing with Scientific Uncertainty , 1992 .

[13]  B. Wynne.  Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. , 1992 .

[14]  B. Norton.  Sustainability, Human Welfare, and Ecosystem Health , 1992, Environmental Values.

[15]  Les Levidow,et al.  Proactive and reactive approaches to risk regulation , 1992 .

[16]  M. Redclift.  Sustainable development and global environmental change: Implications of a changing agenda , 1992 .

[17]  P. Ekins.  A New world order , 1992 .

[18]  Albert Weale,et al.  Controlling pollution in the round: change and choice in environmental regulation in Britain and West Germany , 1991 .

[19]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  The new environmentalism and sustainable development , 1991 .

[20]  Daniel Bodansky,et al.  Law: Scientific Uncertainty and the Precautionary Principle , 1991 .

[21]  John S. Gray,et al.  Scientifically based strategies for marine environmental protection and management , 1991 .

[22]  A. Weale.  The new politics of pollution , 1991 .

[23]  T. O'riordan.  STABILITY AND TRANSFORMATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNMENT , 1991 .

[24]  John S. Gray,et al.  Statistics and the precautionary principle , 1990 .

[25]  A. Dobson.  Green Political Thought , 1990 .

[26]  M. Sagoff,et al.  The Economy of the Earth: The Allocation and Distribution of Resources , 2007 .

[27]  David Pepper,et al.  The Roots of Modern Environmentalism , 1984 .