Social Politics: Agenda Setting and Political Communication on Social Media

Social media play an increasingly important role in political communication. Various studies investigated how individuals adopt social media for political discussion, to share their views about politics and policy, or to mobilize and protest against social issues. Yet, little attention has been devoted to the main actors of political discussions: the politicians. In this paper, we explore the topics of discussion of U.S. President Obama and the 50 U.S. State Governors using Twitter data and agenda-setting theory as a tool to describe the patterns of daily political discussion, uncovering the main topics of attention and interest of these actors. We examine over one hundred thousand tweets produced by these politicians and identify seven macro-topics of conversation, finding that Twitter represents a particularly appealing vehicle of conversation for American opposition politicians. We highlight the main motifs of political conversation of the two parties, discovering that Republican and Democrat Governors are more or less similarly active on Twitter but exhibit different styles of communication. Finally, by reconstructing the networks of occurrences of Governors’ hashtags and keywords related to political issues, we observe that Republicans and Democrats form two tight yet polarized cores, with a strongly different shared agenda on many issues of discussion.

[1]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  The rise of social bots , 2014, Commun. ACM.

[2]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  The Digital Evolution of Occupy Wall Street , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  A. Pentland,et al.  Computational Social Science , 2009, Science.

[4]  J. Bollen,et al.  More Tweets, More Votes: Social Media as a Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  S. Iyengar,et al.  New perspectives and evidence on political communication and campaign effects. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[6]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy , 2010, ICWSM.

[7]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  "Manipulation and abuse on social media" by Emilio Ferrara with Ching-man Au Yeung as coordinator , 2015, SIGWEB Newsl..

[8]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Evolution of online user behavior during a social upheaval , 2014, WebSci '14.

[9]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[10]  Stefan Stieglitz,et al.  Political Communication and Influence through Microblogging--An Empirical Analysis of Sentiment in Twitter Messages and Retweet Behavior , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  J. Macnamara The Quadrivium of Online Public Consultation: Policy, Culture, Resources, Technology , 2010 .

[12]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Election Forecasts With Twitter , 2011 .

[13]  M. McCombs Agenda setting function of mass media , 1977 .

[14]  M. McCombs A Look at Agenda-setting: past, present and future , 2005 .

[15]  Chris Arney Social Physics: How Good Ideas Spread - the Lessons from a New Science , 2014 .

[16]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Traveling trends: social butterflies or frequent fliers? , 2013, COSN '13.

[17]  Raymond W. Preiss,et al.  Mass Media Effects Research , 2006 .

[18]  D. Shaw,et al.  Communication and democracy : exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory , 1997 .

[19]  Yang Feng,et al.  Will Sanders Supporters Jump Ship for Trump? Fine-grained Analysis of Twitter Followers , 2016, ArXiv.

[20]  Raymond W. Preiss,et al.  Effects of Agenda Setting , 2006 .

[21]  Daniel Gayo-Avello,et al.  "I Wanted to Predict Elections with Twitter and all I got was this Lousy Paper" - A Balanced Survey on Election Prediction using Twitter Data , 2012, ArXiv.

[22]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Social Media and Political Participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Democratizing Our Political Systems? , 2011, ePart.

[23]  David A. Shamma,et al.  Characterizing debate performance via aggregated twitter sentiment , 2010, CHI.

[24]  A. Pentland,et al.  Life in the network: The coming age of computational social science: Science , 2009 .

[25]  P. Metaxas,et al.  Social Media and the Elections , 2012, Science.

[26]  P. Howard,et al.  Opening Closed Regimes: What Was the Role of Social Media During the Arab Spring? , 2011 .

[27]  A. Culotta,et al.  Framing in Social Media: How the US Congress Uses Twitter Hashtags to Frame Political Issues , 2013 .

[28]  Juliet E. Carlisle,et al.  Is Social Media Changing How We Understand Political Engagement? An Analysis of Facebook and the 2008 Presidential Election , 2013 .

[29]  R. Gibson,et al.  Does Cyber‐Campaigning Win Votes? Online Communication in the 2004 Australian Election , 2005 .

[30]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Detecting and Tracking Political Abuse in Social Media , 2011, ICWSM.

[31]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  The Geospatial Characteristics of a Social Movement Communication Network , 2013, PloS one.

[32]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Manipulation and Abuse on Social Media , 2015, ArXiv.

[33]  D. Boyd,et al.  CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA , 2012 .

[34]  P. Gerbaudo Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism , 2012 .

[35]  John H. Parmelee,et al.  Politics and the Twitter Revolution: How Tweets Influence the Relationship between Political Leaders and the Public , 2011 .

[36]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Predicting the Political Alignment of Twitter Users , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[37]  David M. Blei,et al.  Probabilistic topic models , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[38]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[39]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Cultivating Social Resources on Social Network Sites: Facebook Relationship Maintenance Behaviors and Their Role in Social Capital Processes , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[40]  W. R. Neuman,et al.  The Dynamics of Public Attention: Agenda‐Setting Theory Meets Big Data , 2014 .

[41]  Jacob R. Straus,et al.  Social Networking and Constituent Communications: Member Use of Twitter During a Two-Month Period in the 111th Congress , 2010 .

[42]  Derek Ruths,et al.  Classifying Political Orientation on Twitter: It's Not Easy! , 2013, ICWSM.

[43]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Political Polarization on Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[44]  Pasquale De Meo,et al.  On Facebook, most ties are weak , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[45]  J. Golbeck,et al.  Twitter use by the U.S. Congress , 2010 .

[46]  Colleen J. Shogan Blackberries, Tweets, and YouTube: Technology and the Future of Communicating with Congress , 2010, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[47]  Jiebo Luo,et al.  Deciphering the 2016 U.S. Presidential Campaign in the Twitter Sphere: A Comparison of the Trumpists and Clintonists , 2016, ICWSM.

[48]  Matthew A. Shapiro,et al.  What's congress doing on twitter? , 2013, CSCW.

[49]  Nathan Yang,et al.  Twitter in Congress: Outreach vs Transparency , 2010 .

[50]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Information Contagion: An Empirical Study of the Spread of News on Digg and Twitter Social Networks , 2010, ICWSM.

[51]  S. Iyengar Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. , 1991 .

[52]  M. Bekafigo,et al.  Who Tweets About Politics? , 2013 .

[53]  Huan Liu,et al.  Is the Sample Good Enough? Comparing Data from Twitter's Streaming API with Twitter's Firehose , 2013, ICWSM.

[54]  Maxwell McCombs,et al.  Agenda-Setting Research: Issues, Attributes, and Influences , 2004 .

[55]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Resolution limit in community detection , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[57]  Daniel Gayo-Avello,et al.  No, You Cannot Predict Elections with Twitter , 2012, IEEE Internet Comput..

[58]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter , 2011, WSDM '11.