Histone modifications involved in cassette exon inclusions: a quantitative and interpretable analysis

BackgroundChromatin structure and epigenetic modifications have been shown to involve in the co-transcriptional splicing of RNA precursors. In particular, some studies have suggested that some types of histone modifications (HMs) may participate in the alternative splicing and function as exon marks. However, most existing studies pay attention to the qualitative relationship between epigenetic modifications and exon inclusion. The quantitative analysis that reveals to what extent each type of epigenetic modification is responsible for exon inclusion is very helpful for us to understand the splicing process.ResultsIn this paper, we focus on the quantitative analysis of HMs’ influence on the inclusion of cassette exons (CEs) into mature RNAs. With the high-throughput ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data obtained from ENCODE website, we modeled the association of HMs with CE inclusions by logistic regression whose coefficients are meaningful and interpretable for us to reveal the effect of each type of HM. Three type of HMs, H3K36me3, H3K9me3 and H4K20me1, were found to play major role in CE inclusions. HMs’ effect on CE inclusions is conservative across cell types, and does not depend on the expression levels of the genes hosting CEs. HMs located in the flanking regions of CEs were also taken into account in our analysis, and HMs within bounded flanking regions were shown to affect moderately CE inclusions. Moreover, we also found that HMs on CEs whose length is approximately close to nucleosomal-DNA length affect greatly on CE inclusion.ConclusionsWe suggested that a few types of HMs correlate closely to alternative splicing and perhaps function jointly with splicing machinery to regulate the inclusion level of exons. Our findings are helpful to understand HMs’ effect on exon definition, as well as the mechanism of co-transcriptional splicing.

[1]  Lior Pachter,et al.  Sequence Analysis , 2020, Definitions.

[2]  C. Muchardt,et al.  Histone H3 lysine 9 trimethylation and HP1γ favor inclusion of alternative exons , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[3]  R. Durbin,et al.  Mapping Quality Scores Mapping Short Dna Sequencing Reads and Calling Variants Using P

, 2022 .

[4]  J. Han,et al.  Inferring causal relationships among different histone modifications and gene expression. , 2008, Genome research.

[5]  Evan C. Merkhofer,et al.  Dynamic histone acetylation is critical for cotranscriptional spliceosome assembly and spliceosomal rearrangements , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Timothy J. Durham,et al.  "Systematic" , 1966, Comput. J..

[7]  Eric T. Wang,et al.  Alternative Isoform Regulation in Human Tissue Transcriptomes , 2008, Nature.

[8]  Steven J Altschuler,et al.  Genomic characterization reveals a simple histone H4 acetylation code. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  E. Wang,et al.  Analysis and design of RNA sequencing experiments for identifying isoform regulation , 2010, Nature Methods.

[10]  Yadong Wang,et al.  Modeling Exon Expression Using Histone Modifications , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  Kairong Cui,et al.  Dynamic regulation of alternative splicing and chromatin structure in Drosophila gonads revealed by RNA-seq , 2010, Cell Research.

[12]  Irene K. Moore,et al.  A genomic code for nucleosome positioning , 2006, Nature.

[13]  Melissa J. Moore,et al.  Pre-mRNA Processing Reaches Back toTranscription and Ahead to Translation , 2009, Cell.

[14]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[15]  Christoforos Nikolaou,et al.  Nucleosome positioning as a determinant of exon recognition , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[16]  Jonathan Schug,et al.  The Nucleosome Map of the Mammalian Liver , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[17]  Jan Komorowski,et al.  Nucleosomes are well positioned in exons and carry characteristic histone modifications. , 2009, Genome research.

[18]  Steven M. Johnson,et al.  Determinants of nucleosome organization in primary human cells , 2011, Nature.

[19]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. , 2010, Nature biotechnology.

[20]  Dustin E. Schones,et al.  High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome , 2007, Cell.

[21]  B. Williams,et al.  Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq , 2008, Nature Methods.

[22]  Weidong Tian,et al.  Epigenetic features are significantly associated with alternative splicing , 2012, BMC Genomics.

[23]  Julia A. Lasserre,et al.  Histone modification levels are predictive for gene expression , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Kayla E. Smith,et al.  The ENCODE Project at UC Santa Cruz , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  T. Richmond,et al.  The structure of DNA in the nucleosome core , 2003, Nature.

[26]  D. Burstein,et al.  Changes in exon-intron structure during vertebrate evolution affect the splicing pattern of exons. , 2012, Genome research.

[27]  T. Nilsen,et al.  Expansion of the eukaryotic proteome by alternative splicing , 2010, Nature.

[28]  T. Richmond,et al.  Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution , 1997, Nature.

[29]  Keith R. Yamamoto,et al.  Reciprocal intronic and exonic histone modification regions in humans , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[30]  G. Ast,et al.  Chromatin organization marks exon-intron structure , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[31]  Christopher J. Lee,et al.  The effect of intron length on exon creation ratios during the evolution of mammalian genomes. , 2008, RNA.

[32]  Peter Saffrey,et al.  Complex Exon-Intron Marking by Histone Modifications Is Not Determined Solely by Nucleosome Distribution , 2010, PloS one.

[33]  E. Lander,et al.  The Mammalian Epigenome , 2007, Cell.

[34]  Hua-Lin Zhou,et al.  Hu proteins regulate alternative splicing by inducing localized histone hyperacetylation in an RNA-dependent manner , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Hyunmin Kim,et al.  Pre-mRNA splicing is a determinant of histone H3K36 methylation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Philip R. Gafken,et al.  Dynamic changes in histone acetylation regulate origins of DNA replication , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[37]  G. Ast,et al.  Alternative splicing and evolution: diversification, exon definition and function , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[38]  T. Kouzarides Chromatin Modifications and Their Function , 2007, Cell.

[39]  B. Blencowe,et al.  Regulation of Alternative Splicing by Histone Modifications , 2010, Science.

[40]  Subhajyoti De,et al.  Histone Modifications Are Associated with Transcript Isoform Diversity in Normal and Cancer Cells , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[41]  J. Ahringer,et al.  Differential chromatin marking of introns and expressed exons by H3K36me3 , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[42]  Jaroslav Icha,et al.  Histone Deacetylase Activity Modulates Alternative Splicing , 2011, PloS one.

[43]  J. Komorowski,et al.  Combinations of Histone Modifications Mark Exon Inclusion Levels , 2012, PloS one.