Investigating how Word-of-Mouth Conversations about Brands Influence Purchase and Retransmission Intentions

This study investigates how the valence, channel, and social tie strength of a word-of-mouth (WOM) conversation about a brand relate to the purchase intentions and WOM retransmission intentions of WOM recipients. The analysis uses a nationally representative sample of 186,775 individual conversations about 804 different brands. The authors find insights linking WOM valence, WOM channel, and social tie strength that could not be revealed if the WOM conversations were analyzed in an aggregated form. The findings contribute to research that investigates differences between offline WOM and online WOM. The authors find that the relationship of WOM valence with purchase intentions is exacerbated when the conversation occurs offline, whereas offline conversations tend to be more strongly associated with WOM retransmission intentions regardless of the conversation's valence. The results also provide insights into how interpersonal characteristics influence WOM outcomes. Specifically, the authors find that the strength of the social tie relationship tends to influence a WOM receiver's intentions to purchase a brand; however, social tie strength has a much weaker association with a consumer's WOM retransmission intentions.

[1]  Dean C. Barnlund,et al.  A Transactional Model of Communication , 2017 .

[2]  Victoria D. Bush,et al.  What We Know and Don't Know about Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature , 2014 .

[3]  Mitchell J. Lovett,et al.  A Data Set of Brands and Their Characteristics , 2014, Mark. Sci..

[4]  Jonah A. Berger,et al.  Communication Channels and Word of Mouth: How the Medium Shapes the Message , 2013 .

[5]  R. Shachar,et al.  On Brands and Word of Mouth , 2013 .

[6]  E. Muller,et al.  Decomposing the Value of Word-of-Mouth Seeding Programs: Acceleration vs. Expansion , 2012 .

[7]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  The effects of social- and self-motives on the intentions to share positive and negative word of mouth , 2013 .

[8]  Dimple R. Thadani,et al.  The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  On Braggarts and Gossips: A Self-Enhancement Account of Word-of-Mouth Generation and Transmission , 2012 .

[10]  Edward B. Keller,et al.  The Face-to-Face Book: Why Real Relationships Rule in a Digital Marketplace , 2012 .

[11]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  What Makes Online Content Viral? , 2012 .

[12]  Eric M. Schwartz,et al.  What Drives Immediate and Ongoing Word of Mouth? , 2011 .

[13]  Martin L. Martens,et al.  Astroturfing Global Warming: It Isn’t Always Greener on the Other Side of the Fence , 2011 .

[14]  A. A. Mitchell,et al.  The Influence of Implicit Attitudes on Choice When Consumers Are Confronted with Conflicting Attribute Information , 2010 .

[15]  Michael Trusov,et al.  Determining Influential Users in Internet Social Networks , 2010 .

[16]  Machele Coleman Bess.  What's All The Buzz About , 2010 .

[17]  Jonah Berger,et al.  Positive Effects of Negative Publicity: When Negative Reviews Increase Sales , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[18]  C. A. Matos,et al.  Word-of-mouth communications in marketing: a meta-analytic review of the antecedents and moderators , 2008 .

[19]  Kathy Hammond,et al.  Measuring the impact of positive and negative word of mouth on brand purchase probability , 2008 .

[20]  G. Lilien,et al.  A multi-stage model of word-of-mouth influence through viral marketing , 2008 .

[21]  Lawrence Feick,et al.  A Penny for Your Thoughts: Referral Reward Programs and Referral Likelihood: , 2007 .

[22]  Vicki G. Morwitz,et al.  When Do Purchase Intentions Predict Sales? , 2006 .

[23]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[24]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[25]  H. Bansal,et al.  Word-of-Mouth Processes within a Services Purchase Decision Context , 2000 .

[26]  Vicki G. Morwitz,et al.  Sales Forecasts for Existing Consumer Products and Services: Do Purchase Intentions Contribute to Accuracy? , 2000 .

[27]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  Albert C. Bemmaor,et al.  Predicting Behavior from Intention-to-Buy Measures: The Parametric Case , 1995 .

[29]  Jonathan K. Frenzen,et al.  Structure, Cooperation, and the Flow of Market Information , 1993 .

[30]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[31]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[32]  C. Manski.  The Use of Intentions Data to Predict Behavior: A Best-Case Analysis , 1990 .

[33]  Jonathan K. Frenzen,et al.  Purchasing Behavior in Embedded Markets , 1990 .

[34]  Jagdip Singh.  Voice, exit, and negative word-of-mouth behaviors: An investigation across three service categories , 1990 .

[35]  Peter H. Reingen,et al.  Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior , 1987 .

[36]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[37]  Gabriel Weimann,et al.  The strength of weak conversational ties in the flow of information and influence , 1983 .

[38]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[39]  J. Burgoon.  Nonverbal Communication Research in the 1970s: An Overview , 1980 .

[40]  D. G. Morrison.  Purchase Intentions and Purchase Behavior , 1979 .

[41]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.