The role of anticipated time pressure in activity scheduling

In the present article we focus on the cost or disutility of engaging in activities arising from the time pressure people frequently experience when they have committed themselves to perform too many activities in a limited amount of time. Specifically, we propose that anticipated time pressure increases the likelihood of two types of planning, one short-term and the other long-term encompassing different strategies for eliminating or deferring activities. In addition, we discuss several behaviorally realistic such strategies. It is assumed that strategies differ depending on whether an activity satisfies physiological needs, is performed because of institutional requirements or social obligations, or is performed because of psychological or social motives. Strategies are also assumed to differ depending on the degree to which planning is feasible. Computer simulations of available activity data are presented to illustrate consequences of the different strategies on time pressure and activity agendas.

[1]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[2]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  A Cognitive Model of Planning , 1979, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  S. Hanson.  THE DETERMINANTS OF DAILY TRAVEL-ACTIVITY PATTERNS: RELATIVE LOCATION AND SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS , 1982 .

[4]  E. I. Pas.  Weekly travel-activity behavior , 1988 .

[5]  R. Kitamura.  An evaluation of activity-based travel analysis , 1988 .

[6]  T Garling,et al.  HOUSEHOLD ACTIVITY SCHEDULING , 1989 .

[7]  H. Simon,et al.  Invariants of human behavior. , 1990, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  A. Newell.  Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[9]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Activity‐based approaches to travel analysis: conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems , 1992 .

[10]  T. Gärling.  The importance of routines for the performance of everyday activities , 1992 .

[11]  Janusz Supernak,et al.  TEMPORAL UTILITY PROFILES OF ACTIVITIES AND TRAVEL: UNCERTAINTY AND DECISION MAKING , 1992 .

[12]  U. Lundberg.  On the Psychobiology of Stress and Health , 1993 .

[13]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A conceptual framework of individual activity program generation , 1993 .

[14]  D Etterna,et al.  Using interactive computer experiments for investigating activity scheduling behaviour , 1993 .

[15]  O. Svenson,et al.  Judgment and Decision Making Under Time Pressure , 1993 .

[16]  T. Gärling,et al.  Chapter 11 Psychological Explanations of Participation in Everyday Activities , 1993 .

[17]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Computational-Process Modelling of Household Activity Scheduling , 1993 .

[18]  T. Gärling,et al.  Computational-Process Modelling of Household Travel Decisions Using a Geographical Information System , 1994 .

[19]  J. Ferrari,et al.  Procrastination and Task Avoidance: Theory, Research, and Treatment , 1995 .

[20]  R. Buehler,et al.  It's About Time: Optimistic Predictions in Work and Love , 1995 .

[21]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Travel choice and the goal/process utility distinction , 1996 .

[22]  U. Lundberg.  Influence of paid and unpaid work on psychophysiological stress responses of men and women. , 1996, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[23]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  AN ACTIVITY-BASED MICROSIMULATION ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES , 1997 .

[24]  S. Fujii,et al.  TWO COMPUTATIONAL PROCESS MODELS OF ACTIVITY-TRAVEL CHOICE. , 1998 .

[25]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Reintroducing attitude theory in travel behavior research: The validity of an interactive interview procedure to predict car use , 1998 .

[26]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Computer Simulation of Household Activity Scheduling , 1998 .

[27]  D. Ettema,et al.  The Role of Planning for Intention-Behavior Consistency , 1999 .

[28]  E. Miller,et al.  A computerized household activity scheduling survey , 2000 .