A longitudinal study of children's text messaging and literacy development.

Recent studies have shown evidence of positive concurrent relationships between children's use of text message abbreviations ('textisms') and performance on standardized assessments of reading and spelling. This study aimed to determine the direction of this association. One hundred and nineteen children aged between 8 and 12 years were assessed on measures of general ability, reading, spelling, rapid phonological retrieval, and phonological awareness at the beginning and end of an academic year. The children were also asked to provide a sample of the text messages that they sent over a 2-day period. These messages were analyzed to determine the extent to which textisms were used. It was found that textism use at the beginning of the academic year was able to predict unique variance in spelling performance at the end of the academic year after controlling for age, verbal IQ, phonological awareness, and spelling ability at the beginning of the year. When the analysis was reversed, reading and spelling ability were unable to predict unique variance in textism usage. These data suggest that there is some evidence of a causal contribution of textism usage to spelling performance in children aged 8-12 years. However, when the measure of rapid phonological retrieval (rapid picture naming) was controlled in the analysis, the relationship between textism use and spelling ability just failed to reach statistical significance, suggesting that phonological access skills may mediate some of the relationship between textism use and spelling performance.

[1]  Stephen J. Frost,et al.  Phonology constrains the internal orthographic representation , 2001 .

[2]  George K. Georgiou,et al.  RAN Components and Reading Development From Grade 3 to Grade 5: What Underlies Their Relationship? , 2009 .

[3]  Clare Wood,et al.  Txt msg n school literacy: does texting and knowledge of text abbreviations adversely affect children's literacy attainment? , 2008 .

[4]  Patricia Greig Bowers,et al.  RAN's contribution to understanding reading disabilities. , 2003 .

[5]  K. Stanovich.  Progress in Understanding Reading: Scientific Foundations and New Frontiers , 2000 .

[6]  C. Wood,et al.  Exploring the relationship between children's knowledge of text message abbreviations and school literacy outcomes. , 2009, The British journal of developmental psychology.

[7]  C. Lewis,et al.  Instant Messaging, Literacies, and Social Identities , 2005 .

[8]  Stephen R. Burgess,et al.  Contributions of Phonological Awareness and Rapid Automatic Naming Ability to the Growth of Word-Reading Skills in Second- to Fifth-Grade Children. , 1997 .

[9]  R. Borowsky,et al.  What does rapid automatized naming measure? A new RAN task compared to naming and lexical decision , 2004, Brain and Language.

[10]  Uta Frith,et al.  Phonological Assessment Battery (Manual and Test Materials) , 1997 .

[11]  Jackie Marsh,et al.  The Techno-Literacy Practices of Young Children , 2004 .

[12]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Reading Development and the Teaching of Reading , 2002 .

[13]  Crispin Thurlow,et al.  From Statistical Panic to Moral Panic: The Metadiscursive Construction and Popular Exaggeration of New Media Language in the Print Media , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  Michelle Drouin,et al.  R u txting? Is the Use of Text Speak Hurting Your Literacy? , 2009 .

[15]  Maureen Dixon,et al.  Does exposure to orthography affect children's spelling accuracy? , 2007 .