When and where perceptual load interacts with voluntary visuospatial attention: An event-related potential and dipole modeling study

Perceptual load is recognized to affect visual selective attention, but at an unknown spatiotemporal locus in the brain. To examine this issue, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants performed an orientation discrimination task, under conditions of low or high perceptual load. Participants were required to respond to targets (10% of trials) presented in the attended visual field while ignoring all stimuli in the unattended visual field. The interaction between voluntary attention and perceptual load was significant for the posterior N1 component (190 ms) but not for the earlier C1 (84 ms) or P1 (100 ms) components. This load by attention interaction for N1 was localized to the temporoparietal-occipital (TPO) gyrus by dipole modeling analysis. Dipole modeling also showed that a reversed attentional effect in the C1 time range was due to ERP overlap from the subsequent attention-sensitive P1 component. Results suggest that perceptual load affects voluntary visuospatial attention at an early (but not the earliest) processing stage and that the TPO gyrus mediates target selection at the discrimination stage.

[1]  George R. Mangun,et al.  Reflexive Attention Modulates Processing of Visual Stimuli in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 1998, Psychological science.

[2]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Attention: Some theoretical considerations. , 1963 .

[3]  G R Mangun,et al.  Attention and spatial selection: Electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses , 1994 .

[5]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to the color and direction of moving stimuli: Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical feature selection , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Shihui Han,et al.  Neural mechanisms of attentional modulation of perceptual grouping by collinearity , 2005, Neuroreport.

[7]  G. R. Mangun,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(01)00046-3 , 2001 .

[8]  J. Polich,et al.  Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[9]  C. Koch Strategies and Models of Selective Attention , 2010 .

[10]  G. Mangun Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[11]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Attention Modulates Contextual Influences in the Primary Visual Cortex of Alert Monkeys , 1999, Neuron.

[12]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Delayed Striate Cortical Activation during Spatial Attention , 2002, Neuron.

[13]  A. Ioannides,et al.  Effects of attention and arousal on early responses in striate cortex , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[14]  E. Vogel,et al.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[15]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Event-related potentials reveal dissociable mechanisms for orienting and focusing visuospatial attention. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Brain mechanisms of involuntary visuospatial attention: An event‐related potential study , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[17]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) in Neuroergonomics , 2006, Neuroergonomics.

[18]  J. Hopfinger,et al.  Appearing and disappearing stimuli trigger a reflexive modulation of visual cortical activity. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[19]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  J. J. Lange,et al.  An ERP study of visual spatial attention and letter target detection for isoluminant and nonisoluminant stimuli. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[21]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  G. R. Mangun,et al.  Interactions between attention and perceptual grouping in human visual cortex , 2006, Brain Research.

[23]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  Pushing around the Locus of Selection: Evidence for the Flexible-selection Hypothesis , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  M. Coles,et al.  Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology : central and autonomic nervous system approaches , 1991 .

[26]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Effects of the amount of stimulus information processed on negative event-related potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  E Donchin,et al.  A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. , 1981, Science.

[28]  Antigona Martínez,et al.  Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  N. Lavie Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Shimin Fu,et al.  Selective attention to orientation and closure: An event-related potential study , 2000 .

[31]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  E. Vogel,et al.  The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[34]  M. Woldorff,et al.  Distortion of ERP averages due to overlap from temporally adjacent ERPs: analysis and correction. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[35]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. , 1994 .

[36]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Right TPJ deactivation during visual search: functional significance and support for a filter hypothesis. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Popout modulates focal attention in the primary visual cortex , 2004, NeuroImage.

[38]  B McElree,et al.  Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Spatial Selective Attention Affects Early Extrastriate But Not Striate Components of the Visual Evoked Potential , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Exogenous attentional selection of transparent superimposed surfaces modulates early event-related potentials , 2005, Vision Research.

[42]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[43]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Contextual modulation in primary visual cortex and scene perception , 2000 .

[44]  Gianluca Campana,et al.  Attention modulates psychophysical and electrophysiological response to visual texture segmentation in humans , 2005, Vision Research.

[45]  B. C. Motter Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Neuroergonomics: The Brain at Work , 2006 .

[47]  Shimin Fu,et al.  The attentional effects of peripheral cueing as revealed by two event-related potential studies , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[48]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Manipulation of event-related potential manifestations of information processing stages. , 1982, Science.

[49]  E. Amenedo,et al.  Modulations of the visual N1 component of event-related potentials by central and peripheral cueing , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[50]  D. Jeffreys,et al.  Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I. Component of striate cortical origin , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[51]  Richard B Buxton,et al.  Putting spatial attention on the map: timing and localization of stimulus selection processes in striate and extrastriate visual areas , 2001, Vision Research.

[52]  G. Mangun,et al.  Perceptual Load and Visuocortical Processing: Event-Related Potentials Reveal Sensory-Level Selection , 2001, Psychological science.

[53]  Todd C. Handy,et al.  Capacity Theory as a Model of Cortical Behavior , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[55]  D. Talsma,et al.  Methods for the estimation and removal of artifacts and overlap in ERP data , 2004 .

[56]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans , 1994, Nature.

[57]  P. Fox,et al.  Retinotopic organization of early visual spatial attention effects as revealed by PET and ERPs , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[58]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Localizing visual discrimination processes in time and space. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.