Prediction of Measurement Precision by Chemometric Invalidation of Flow Pulsation in Refractive Index Detection of Liquid Chromatography

The standard deviation and relative standard deviation of measurements in the refractive index detection of liquid chro-matography are predicted based on the 1/ f fluctuation model which is made up of white noise and the Markov process. First, repeated measurements and Monte Carlo simulation corroborate the reliability of this prediction in the absence of flow pulsation. Pulsation, if any, can be distinguished in the frequency space from the 1/ f noise which is common to most analytical instruments. In this case, the uncertainty prediction is also available without modifying the prediction theory, if a zero window is set at the time period of a fundamental tone of the pulsation (virtual invalidation of pulsation). The zero window is used for determining the zero level relative to which the signal intensities are summed for a signal area (measurement). A maltose determination is taken as an example.

[1]  Rieko Matsuda,et al.  Deductive Prediction of Precision in Measurement, Calibration, and Standard Addition Method in Atomic Absorption Spectrometry for Cadmium , 1998 .

[2]  R. Matsuda,et al.  Precision-Optimization of Wavelengths in Diode-Array Detection in Separation Science , 1997 .

[3]  R. Matsuda,et al.  Prediction of precision from signal and noise measurement in liquid chromatography: Mathematical relationship between integration domain and precision , 1995 .

[4]  R. Matsuda,et al.  Prediction of precision from signal and noise measurement in liquid chromatography: Limit of detection , 1995 .

[5]  R. Matsuda,et al.  Deductive prediction of measurement precision from signal and noise in liquid chromatography , 1994 .

[6]  P. Boumans Detection limits and spectral interferences in atomic emission spectrometry , 1994 .

[7]  H. Engelhardt,et al.  A photometric flow measurements method for characterisation of HPLC pumps , 1994 .

[8]  R. G. Brownlee,et al.  Comparison of Dynamic and Static Mixing Devices for Gradient Micro-HPLC , 1985 .

[9]  B. Karger,et al.  Gradient elution chromatography with microbore columns , 1983 .

[10]  J. Ingle,et al.  Precision of flame atomic absorption measurements of arsenic, cadmium, calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, molybdenum, sodium, and zinc , 1977 .

[11]  J. Ingle,et al.  Precision of flame atomic absorption measurements of copper , 1976 .

[12]  S. R. Crouch,et al.  Theoretical and experimental investigation of factors affecting precision in molecular absorption spectrophotometry , 1975 .

[13]  H. Smit,et al.  Base-line noise and detection limits in signal-integrating analytical methods. Application to chromatography , 1975 .

[14]  J. Ingle Precision of atomic absorption spectrometric measurements , 1974 .

[15]  S. R. Crouch,et al.  Evaluation of precision of quantitative molecular absorption spectrometric measurements , 1972 .

[16]  S. R. Crouch,et al.  Critical comparison of photon counting and direct current measurement techniques for quantitative spectrometric methods. , 1972, Analytical chemistry.

[17]  R. Matsuda,et al.  Probabilistic approach to confidence intervals of linear calibration , 1996 .

[18]  H. Smit,et al.  Theoretical calculation of the standard deviation and detection limit in inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry , 1994 .

[19]  T. Korenaga,et al.  Computer-controlled micropump suitable for precise microliter delivery and complete in-line mixing , 1994 .

[20]  P. Boumans,et al.  Measuring detection limits in inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry-II. Experimental data and their interpretation , 1991 .

[21]  P.W.J.M. Boumans,et al.  Atomic emission detection limits; more than incidental analytical figures of merit! - A tutorial discussion of the differences and links between two complementary approaches— , 1991 .

[22]  P. Boumans Measuring detection limits in inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry using the “SBR—RSDB approach”—I. A tutorial discussion of the theory , 1991 .

[23]  E. D. Prudnikov Detection limits and error estimation in analysis , 1990 .

[24]  E. D. Prudnikov,et al.  Random errors in analytical methods , 1984 .

[25]  D. J. Johnson,et al.  A comparison of signal-to-noise ratios for single channel methods (sequential and multiplex) vs multichannel methods in optical spectroscopy☆ , 1976 .