Influence of scientific–technical literacy on consumers’ behavioural intentions regarding new food

The application of genetic engineering to agriculture has led to an important and controversial innovation in the food sector, so-called Genetically Modified (GM) food. A great deal of literature has studied cognitive and attitudinal factors conditioning consumers' acceptance of GM food, knowledge being one of the most inconsistent variables. Notwithstanding, some authors suggest closer attention should be paid to "science literacy", even more so than knowledge. This paper studies the potential role of consumer literacy fields - i.e. consumer scientific-technical or social-humanistic literacy - in determining consumer choice behaviour towards GM foods. We analyse the strength of the moderating effects produced by consumer university training in some of the most important factors which influence consumers' innovative product acceptance, such as perceived benefits and risks, attitudes to GM technology, trust in institutions or knowledge. The research is performed in southern Spain, using a variance-based technique called Structural Equation Modelling by Partial Least Squares (PLSs). The results show that perceived benefits and risks play a significant role in shaping behavioural intentions towards GM food, the attitude to GM technology being the main driver of consumers' beliefs about risks and benefits. Additionally, behavioural intentions display some differences between the scientific-technical and social-humanistic literacy fields, the variables of trust in institutions and knowledge registering the most striking differences.

[1]  H. Wold.  Systems Analysis by Partial Least Squares , 1983 .

[2]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[3]  Wolf Oliver,et al.  Consequences, Opportunities and Challenges of Modern Biotechnology for Europe , 2007 .

[4]  Agnes Allansdottir,et al.  Europeans and biotechnology in 2005: patterns and trends: final report on Eurobarometer 64.3 , 2006 .

[5]  Jose Maria Gil,et al.  Structural equation modelling of consumer acceptance of genetically modified (GM) food in the Mediterranean Europe: A cross country study , 2009 .

[6]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[7]  Kent D. Nassen,et al.  Representation of measurement error in marketing variables: Review of approaches and extension to three-facet designs , 1998 .

[8]  Scientific.  International Standard Classification of Education, ISCED 1997 , 2003 .

[9]  D. Moran.  Investigating GM risk perceptions: a survey of anti-GM and environmental campaign group members , 2006 .

[10]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  A Causal Model Explaining the Perception and Acceptance of Gene Technology1 , 1999 .

[11]  Robert J. Fisher,et al.  Gender Differences in Decision Satisfaction within Established Dyads: Effects of Competitive and Cooperative Behaviors , 2006 .

[12]  L. Bredahl.  DETERMINANTS OF CONSUMER ATTITUDES AND PURCHASE INTENTIONS WITH REGARD TO GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS – RESULTS OF A CROSS-NATIONAL SURVEY Working , 2000 .

[13]  Benjamin M. Onyango.  CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS: ROLE OF PRODUCT BENEFITS AND PERCEIVED RISKS , 2003 .

[14]  L. M. Martínez,et al.  Consumer-perceived risk model for the introduction of genetically modified food in Spain , 2009 .

[15]  José Luis Roldán Salgueiro,et al.  Web Acceptance and Usage Model: A Comparison between Goal-directed and Experiential Web Users , 2005 .

[16]  Cheryl J. Wachenheim,et al.  Perceptions of Genetically Modified and Organic Foods and Processes , 2007 .

[17]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory , 1982 .

[18]  Eric C. Schuck,et al.  Consumer Valuation Of Genetically Modified Foods And The Effect Of Information Bias , 2003 .

[19]  Elias Mossialos,et al.  Consumer involvement and acceptance of biotechnology in the European Union: a specific focus on Spain and the UK , 2005 .

[20]  Clive James,et al.  Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2006. , 2006 .

[21]  Kynda R. Curtis,et al.  Genetically Modified Food Market Participation and Consumer Risk Perceptions: A Cross‐Country Comparison , 2006 .

[22]  Jayson L. Lusk,et al.  Consumer acceptance of genetically modified foods , 2002 .

[23]  P. Adams.  Frequently Asked Questions: Find it @ DMU , 2005 .

[24]  K. Grunert,et al.  Consumer Attitudes and Decision-Making With Regard to Genetically Engineered Food Products – A Review of the Literature and a Presentation of Models for Future Research , 1998 .

[25]  Benjamin M. Onyango,et al.  Product Attributes and Consumer Acceptance of Nutritionally Enhanced Genetically Modified Foods , 2004 .

[26]  Wuyang Hu,et al.  Trading off health, environmental and genetic modification attributes in food , 2004 .

[27]  Attitudes towards genetically modified and organic foods , 2006, Appetite.

[28]  Joachim Scholderer,et al.  Communicating about the risks and benefits of genetically modified foods. Effects of different information strategies , 2000 .

[29]  Lynn J. Frewer,et al.  Genetic engineering and food: What determines consumer acceptance , 1995 .

[30]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Factors influencing public acceptance of innovative food technologies and products , 2008 .

[31]  J. Lassen,et al.  Europeans and Biotechnology in 2002 , 2003 .

[32]  Claes Fornell,et al.  A second generation of multivariate analysis , 1982 .

[33]  J. Viaene,et al.  Consumer beliefs and attitude towards genetically modified food: Basis for segmentation and implications for communication , 2003 .

[34]  J. Viaene,et al.  Consumer Attitudes Towards GM Food , 2003 .

[35]  S. Jaeger,et al.  Categories of GM Risk-Benefit Perceptions and Their Antecedents , 2004 .

[36]  A. Goldberger,et al.  Causal Models in the Social Sciences. , 1972 .

[37]  H. J. H. MacFie,et al.  Consumer-led food product development. , 2007 .

[38]  S. Jaeger,et al.  Perceptions of the risks and benefits of genetically-modified foods and their influence on willingness to consume , 2006 .

[39]  L. Bredahl,et al.  Consumers» Cognitions With Regard to Genetically Modified Foods. Results of a Qualitative Study in Four Countries , 1999, Appetite.

[40]  Wynne W. Chin.  Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[41]  Susanna Hornig Priest,et al.  US public opinion divided over biotechnology? , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[42]  Manuel J. Sánchez-Franco,et al.  Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling: Guidelines for Using Partial Least Squares in Information Systems Research , 2012 .

[43]  B. Schilling,et al.  Product attributes, consumer benefits and public approval of genetically modified foods , 2003 .

[44]  G. Gaskell,et al.  Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S. , 1999, Science.

[45]  B. Verplanken,et al.  Understanding Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified Food: The Role of Values and Attitude Strength , 2004 .

[46]  Jae-Hwan Han.  The effects of perceptions on consumer acceptance of genetically modified (GM) foods , 2006 .

[47]  Wynne W. Chin.  How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses , 2010 .

[48]  S. Jaeger,et al.  Effect of information about benefits of biotechnology on consumer acceptance of genetically modified food: evidence from experimental auctions in the United States, England, and France , 2004 .

[49]  Richard Shepherd,et al.  Public Concerns in the United Kingdom about General and Specific Applications of Genetic Engineering: Risk, Benefit, and Ethics , 1997, Science, technology & human values.

[50]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[51]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares , 1999 .

[52]  Mei-Fang Chen,et al.  The consumer’s attitude toward genetically modified foods in Taiwan , 2007 .

[53]  Sara R. Jaeger,et al.  Objective and Subjective Knowledge: Impacts on Consumer Demand for Genetically Modified Foods in the United States and the European Union , 2004 .

[54]  M. Fishbein.  An Investigation of the Relationships between Beliefs about an Object and the Attitude toward that Object , 1963 .

[55]  L. Bredahl.  Determinants of Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions With Regard to Genetically Modified Food – Results of a Cross-National Survey , 2001 .

[56]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. , 1982 .

[57]  J. Roosen,et al.  Knowledge, attitudes towards and acceptability of genetic modification in Germany , 2008, Appetite.

[58]  Joanne Scully,et al.  Genetic engineering and perceived levels of risk , 2003 .

[59]  G. Gaskell,et al.  GM Foods and the Misperception of Risk Perception , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[60]  W. Adamowicz,et al.  Genetically Modified Foods: Consumers' Attitudes and Labeling Issues , 2004 .

[61]  Niels Mejlgaard,et al.  Europeans and Biotechnology in 2010. Winds of change , 2010 .

[62]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Assessing Between-Group Differences in Information Systems Research: A Comparison of Covariance-and Component-Based SEM , 2009, MIS Q..

[63]  A. Goldberger,et al.  Causal Models in the Social Sciences. , 1972 .

[64]  H. Moerbeek,et al.  Gender differences in consumers' acceptance of genetically modified foods , 2005 .

[65]  Mei-Fang Chen,et al.  An integrated research framework to understand consumer attitudes and purchase intentions toward genetically modified foods , 2008 .

[66]  Беляева Татьяна Александровна.  Система образования российской Федерации в рамках Международной стандартной классификации образования (International Standard Classification of education - ISCED) , 2011 .

[67]  R. Baxter.  Reflective and formative metrics of relationship value: a commentary essay , 2009 .

[68]  Klaus G. Grunert,et al.  Acceptability of genetically modified cheese presented as real product alternative , 2002 .

[69]  Kynda R. Curtis,et al.  Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food Products in the Developing World , 2004 .

[70]  J. Gil,et al.  Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy , 2008 .

[71]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[72]  W. Chern,et al.  A Continuum of Consumer Attitudes Toward Genetically Modified Foods in the United States , 2006 .

[73]  Michel Tenenhaus,et al.  PLS methodology to study relationships between hedonic judgements and product characteristics , 2005 .

[74]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[75]  R. Frank Falk,et al.  A Primer for Soft Modeling , 1992 .

[76]  PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY AND ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD , 2002 .

[77]  Klaus G. Grunert,et al.  Consumer perceptions of food products involving genetic modification : results from a qualitative study in four Nordic countries , 2001 .

[78]  W. Hallman,et al.  An empirical investigation of the role of knowledge in public opinion about GM food , 2005 .

[79]  Leslie D. Hall,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators 2010. NSB 10-01. , 2010 .

[80]  M. Siegrist.  The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[81]  P. Hackl,et al.  Robustness of partial least-squares method for estimating latent variable quality structures , 1999 .

[82]  David R. Fortin,et al.  Consumer acceptance of genetically modified foods in New Zealand , 2003 .

[83]  Gregory A. Baker,et al.  The market for genetically modified foods: consumer characteristics and policy implications , 2001 .

[84]  Timothy C. Earle,et al.  Social Trust , 1995 .

[85]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[86]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .