Luminance, contrast and spatial-frequency tuning of the transient-vergence system

Vergence has transient components that are stimulated by brief presentations of stimuli at large disparities (up to several degrees). The question that we have addressed is what stimulus features are encoded by this system. A competition paradigm [Jones & Kerr, (1972)]. Vision Research, 12, 1425-1430) was used in which three gabors were presented. A single Gabor was presented to the fovea of one eye and two gabors, 2.5 deg to either side of the fovea, to the other; one of which, when paired with the single Gabor defined a convergent direction, the other a divergent direction. First we determined if increasing the luminance contrast of the Gabor pair whose disparity was opposite to the observer's response-bias direction (variable-contrast pair) relative to the remaining Gabor (reference) could alter the observer's response direction. Secondly, we determined if the contrast required for such a change in response was affected by the relative spatial frequency of the convergent and divergent Gabors. The reference Gabor was held at 2 cpd and the variable Gabor pair was varied between 5.6 and 0 (a gaussian) cpd. Results demonstrated that increasing the luminance contrast of the variable pair relative to the reference Gabor could alter the observer's response direction, even when the contrast of only one of the variable-pair Gabors was increased. The luminance contrast required for this change to occur was directly related to the spatial frequency of the variable pair over the entire frequency range tested. Vergence responses were preferentially made to lower spatial frequencies, even when a low spatial frequency was pared with a high one. We conclude that transient-vergence responses are not reduced by mixed contrasts (i.e. no contrast-paradox effect) and appear to be mediated by a system that employs a single lowpass sensitive channel.

[1]  S. Nishida,et al.  Contrast Sensitivity of the Motion System , 1996, Vision Research.

[2]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Analysis of stereothresholds for stimuli below 2.5 c/deg , 1994, Vision Research.

[3]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Properties of stimuli eliciting vergence eye movements and stereopsis. , 1970, Vision research.

[4]  G Westheimer,et al.  The sensory stimulus for disjunctive eye movements. , 1969, Vision research.

[5]  P A Kolers,et al.  Figural change in apparent motion. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Dual multiple-scale processing for motion in the human visual System , 1997, Vision Research.

[7]  Frank L. Kooi,et al.  Spatial localization across channels , 1991, Vision Research.

[8]  J. T. Enright.  Changes in vergence mediated by saccades. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  F A Miles,et al.  Short-latency disparity vergence responses and their dependence on a prior saccadic eye movement. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  D. Navon,et al.  Irrelevance of figural identity for resolving ambiguities in apparent motion. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  L. Cormack,et al.  Interocular correlation, luminance contrast and cyclopean processing , 1991, Vision Research.

[13]  Marc Green,et al.  What determines correspondence strength in apparent motion? , 1986, Vision Research.

[14]  J. E. Raymond,et al.  The effect of local luminance contrast on induced motion , 1990, Vision Research.

[15]  G. Sperling,et al.  The dimensionality of texture-defined motion: a single channel theory , 1993, Vision Research.

[16]  C. Schor,et al.  Spatial tuning of static and dynamic local stereopsis , 1984, Vision Research.

[17]  R. Blake,et al.  How Contrast Affects Stereoacuity , 1988, Perception.

[18]  R. Jones,et al.  MOTOR RESPONSES TO CONFLICTING ASYMMETRICAL VERGENCE STIMULUS INFORMATION* , 1971, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  W. King,et al.  Dynamics and efficacy of saccade-facilitated vergence eye movements in monkeys. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Martin Kaye,et al.  Stereopsis without binocular correlation , 1978, Vision Research.

[21]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Stereopsis and contrast , 1989, Vision Research.

[22]  P. Lennie,et al.  Spatial frequency analysis in the visual system. , 1985, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  G K Hung,et al.  Initial control component in disparity vergence eye movements , 1993, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[24]  C. Schor,et al.  Voluntary effort as a stimulus to accommodation and vergence. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  Clifton Schor,et al.  Interocular differences in contrast and spatial frequency: Effects on stereopsis and fusion , 1989, Vision Research.

[26]  R. Hilz,et al.  Contrast Sensitivity of the Human Eye for Square-Wave Gratings , 1965 .

[27]  Laurie M. Wilcox,et al.  Linear and non-linear filtering in stereopsis , 1994, Vision Research.