Disturbance macroecology: integrating disturbance ecology and macroecology with different-age post-fire stands of a closed-cone pine forest

Macroecological studies have generally restricted their scope to relatively steady-state systems, and as a result, how biodiversity and abundance metrics are expected to scale in disturbance-dependent ecosystems is unknown. We examine macroecological patterns in a fire-dependent forest of Bishop pine (Pinus muricata). We target two different-aged stands in a stand-replacing fire regime, one a characteristically mature stand with a diverse understory, and one more recently disturbed by a stand-replacing fire (17 years prior to measurement). We compare the stands using macroecological metrics of species richness, abundance and spatial distributions that are predicted by the Maximum Entropy Theory of Ecology (METE), an information-entropy based theory that has proven highly successful in predicting macroecological metrics across a wide variety of systems and taxa. Ecological patterns in the mature stand more closely match METE predictions than do data from the recently disturbed stand. This suggests METE’s predictions are more robust in late-successional, slowly changing, or steady-state systems than those in rapid flux with respect to species composition, abundances, and organisms’ sizes. Our findings highlight the need for a macroecological theory that incorporates natural disturbance and other ecological perturbations into its predictive capabilities, because most natural systems are not in a steady state.

[1]  G. vanRossum Python reference manual , 1995 .

[2]  John Harte,et al.  Maximum information entropy: a foundation for ecological theory. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  Reed F. Noss,et al.  Endangered Ecosystems of the United States: A Preliminary Assessment of Loss and Degradation , 1996, Restoration & Management Notes.

[4]  J. Alroy The shape of terrestrial abundance distributions , 2015, Science Advances.

[5]  J. Harte,et al.  Inferring Regional-Scale Species Diversity from Small-Plot Censuses , 2015, PloS one.

[6]  K. Frank,et al.  Dynamic macroecology on ecological time‐scales , 2010 .

[7]  M. Moritz,et al.  Climate change‐induced shifts in fire for Mediterranean ecosystems , 2013 .

[8]  Anke Jentsch,et al.  The Search for Generality in Studies of Disturbance and Ecosystem Dynamics , 2001 .

[9]  John Harte,et al.  Scale collapse and the emergence of the power law species–area relationship , 2015 .

[10]  M. Moritz,et al.  Disease, fuels and potential fire behavior: Impacts of Sudden Oak Death in two coastal California forest types , 2015 .

[11]  J. Harte,et al.  Maximum entropy and the state-variable approach to macroecology. , 2008, Ecology.

[12]  S. Schlossberg,et al.  Measuring the effectiveness of conservation programs for shrubland birds , 2015 .

[13]  R. May Patterns of species abundance and diversity , 1975 .

[14]  E. White,et al.  A Strong Test of the Maximum Entropy Theory of Ecology , 2013, The American Naturalist.

[15]  E. L. Little Atlas of United States trees. , 1971 .

[16]  D. Burslem,et al.  Defining and defending Connell's intermediate disturbance hypothesis: a response to Fox. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  Keith C. Hamer,et al.  Scale‐Dependent Effects of Habitat Disturbance on Species Richness in Tropical Forests , 2000 .

[18]  R. A. Kempton,et al.  Log-Series and Log-Normal Parameters as Diversity Discriminants for the Lepidoptera , 1974 .

[19]  M. Turner Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world. , 2010, Ecology.

[20]  J. Kitzes,et al.  macroeco: Reproducible ecological pattern analysis in Python , 2016 .

[21]  James Rosindell,et al.  Unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[22]  C. M. Moore,et al.  The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California , 2014 .

[23]  Richard Condit,et al.  Tropical Forest Census Plots: Methods and Results from Barro Colorado Island, Panama and a Comparison with Other Plots , 1998 .

[24]  Global Ecology and Biogeography , 2020, Global Ecology and Biogeography.

[25]  Mutsunori Tokeshi,et al.  Species Abundance Patterns and Community Structure , 1993 .

[26]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[27]  J. Harte,et al.  Biodiversity scales from plots to biomes with a universal species-area curve. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[28]  Ethan P. White,et al.  Exploring the spatially explicit predictions of the Maximum Entropy Theory of Ecology , 2014, bioRxiv.

[29]  S. Ernest,et al.  Species-level and community-level responses to disturbance: a cross-community analysis. , 2014, Ecology.

[30]  P. White,et al.  The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics , 1986 .

[31]  Ethan P White,et al.  Characterizing species abundance distributions across taxa and ecosystems using a simple maximum entropy model. , 2012, Ecology.

[32]  S. J. Mayor,et al.  Scaling Disturbance Instead of Richness to Better Understand Anthropogenic Impacts on Biodiversity , 2015, PloS one.

[33]  Ganapati P. Patil,et al.  Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. , 1980 .

[34]  R. H. Whittaker,et al.  Dominance and Diversity in Land Plant Communities , 1965, Science.

[35]  Ethan P. White,et al.  An extensive comparison of species-abundance distribution models , 2015, bioRxiv.

[36]  P. Brown,et al.  Fire history in Douglas-fir and coast redwood forests at Point Reyes National Seashore, California , 1999 .

[37]  T. Dawson Fog in the California redwood forest: ecosystem inputs and use by plants , 1998, Oecologia.

[38]  M. Turner,et al.  LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY : The Effect of Pattern on Process 1 , 2002 .

[39]  M. Turner,et al.  Factors Influencing Succession: Lessons from Large, Infrequent Natural Disturbances , 1998, Ecosystems.

[40]  W. Romme,et al.  Are Large, Infrequent Disturbances Qualitatively Different from Small, Frequent Disturbances? , 1998, Ecosystems.

[41]  J. Fox,et al.  The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[42]  I. Hoste Bruce G. Baldwin, Douglas H. Goldman, David J. Keil, Robert W. Patterson, Thomas J. Rosatti and Dieter H. Wilken (eds) (2012) The Jepson Manual. Vascular Plants of California , 2013 .

[43]  P. White,et al.  The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics , 1986 .

[44]  S. Stephens,et al.  Anthropogenic fire and bark thickness in coastal and island pine populations from Alta and Baja California , 2006 .

[45]  R. Death The effect of habitat stability on benthic invertebrate communities: the utility of species abundance distributions , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[46]  J. Diamond,et al.  Ecology and Evolution of Communities , 1976, Nature.

[47]  O. Loucks,et al.  From Balance of Nature to Hierarchical Patch Dynamics: A Paradigm Shift in Ecology , 1995, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[48]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Comparing Large, Infrequent Disturbances: What Have We Learned? , 1998, Ecosystems.

[49]  F. A. Bazzaz,et al.  Plant Species Diversity in Old‐Field Successional Ecosystems in Southern Illinois , 1975 .

[50]  An experimental test of the response of macroecological patterns to altered species interactions. , 2012, Ecology.

[51]  K. Hamer,et al.  Using species abundance models as indicators of habitat disturbance in tropical forests , 1998 .

[52]  B. Quayle,et al.  A Project for Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity , 2007 .

[53]  M. Moritz,et al.  Landscape-Scale Vegetation Change Following Fire in Point Reyes, California, USA , 2011 .

[54]  E. Jaynes On the rationale of maximum-entropy methods , 1982, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[55]  Jerry D. Davis,et al.  Spatial variability in stand structure and density-dependent mortality in newly established post-fire stands of a California closed-cone pine forest , 2011 .

[56]  C. Millar The California closed cone pines (subsection Oocarpae Little and Critchfield): A taxonomic history and review , 1986 .

[57]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A meta-analysis of species-abundance distributions , 2010 .

[58]  C. Millar A STEEP CLINE IN PINUS MURICATA , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[59]  John Harte,et al.  Empirical tests of within‐ and across‐species energetics in a diverse plant community , 2014 .

[60]  R. O'Neill,et al.  A revised concept of landscape equilibrium: Disturbance and stability on scaled landscapes , 1993, Landscape Ecology.

[61]  K. Hamer,et al.  Effects of selective logging on tropical forest butterflies on Buru, Indonesia , 1995 .

[62]  J. Harte Maximum Entropy and Ecology: A Theory of Abundance, Distribution, and Energetics , 2011 .

[63]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Community assembly on isolated islands: macroecology meets evolution , 2016 .

[64]  Erica A. Newman,et al.  Taxon Categories and the Universal Species-Area Relationship , 2013, The American Naturalist.

[65]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem , 1980 .

[66]  Jianguo Wu Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[67]  M. Nummelin Log‐normal distribution of species abundances is not a universal indicator of rain forest disturbance , 1998 .

[68]  John Harte,et al.  Metabolic partitioning across individuals in ecological communities , 2017 .

[69]  E. White,et al.  An empirical evaluation of four variants of a universal species–area relationship , 2013, PeerJ.

[70]  John S. Gray,et al.  Detecting pollution induced changes in communities using the log-normal distribution of individuals among species , 1981 .