Low-Intensity Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer in Older Women: Results From the Prospective Multicenter HOPE Trial

PURPOSE Older women with high-risk early breast cancer (EBC) benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, but their treatment is frequently complicated by toxic side effects, resulting in dose reductions and delays. This makes it challenging for oncologists to maintain a relative dose intensity (RDI) ≥ 85%, as recommended for optimal curative-intent treatment. Understanding which women are at risk of receiving suboptimal RDI may inform treatment discussions and guide early, targeted supportive care or geriatric comanagement interventions. METHODS This was a prespecified secondary analysis of the HOPE trial, which enrolled women age ≥ 65 years with EBC initiating neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. RDI was calculated as the ratio of delivered to planned chemotherapy dose intensity. The primary outcome was low RDI, defined as RDI < 85%. Multivariable logistic regression with stepwise selection was used to evaluate the association between baseline variables (demographic, clinical, and geriatric assessment) and low RDI. Survival probability was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare overall survival. RESULTS Three hundred twenty-two patients (median age at diagnosis, 70 years; range, 65-86 years) were included. The median follow-up was 4 years. Sixty-six patients (21%) had a low RDI. Age ≥ 76 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.57; 95% CI, 1.12 to 5.91; P = .03), lower performance status (OR, 4.32; 95% CI, 1.98 to 9.42; P < .001), and use of anthracycline-based or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil regimens (OR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.71 to 7.05; P < .001) were associated with low RDI. The 5-year overall survival probability was 0.80 versus 0.91 in patients with RDI < 85 versus ≥ 85%, respectively (log-rank P = .02). CONCLUSION One in five older patients with EBC treated with standard chemotherapy received low RDI and had inferior survival outcomes. Older patients at risk for low RDI should be identified and targeted upfront before initiating chemotherapy.

[1]  T. Synold,et al.  Inflammation and Clinical Decline After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Older Adults With Breast Cancer: Results From the Hurria Older Patients Prospective Study , 2022, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  A. Gajra,et al.  The Use and Knowledge of Validated Geriatric Assessment Instruments Among US Community Oncologists , 2022, JCO oncology practice.

[3]  S. Plumb,et al.  Evaluation of geriatric assessment and management on the toxic effects of cancer treatment (GAP70+): a cluster-randomised study , 2021, The Lancet.

[4]  M. Fakih,et al.  Geriatric Assessment-Driven Intervention (GAIN) on Chemotherapy-Related Toxic Effects in Older Adults With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2021, JAMA oncology.

[5]  G. Kuchel,et al.  Accelerated aging in older cancer survivors , 2021, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[6]  C. Nielson,et al.  Relative Dose Intensity of Chemotherapy and Survival in Patients with Advanced Stage Solid Tumor Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis , 2021, The oncologist.

[7]  William A. Hammond,et al.  Addition of chemotherapy to local therapy in women aged 70 years or older with triple-negative breast cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. , 2020, The Lancet. Oncology.

[8]  W. Dale,et al.  How Is Geriatric Assessment Used in Clinical Practice for Older Adults With Cancer? A Survey of Cancer Providers by the American Society of Clinical Oncology , 2020, JCO oncology practice.

[9]  H. Cohen,et al.  Older adult participation in cancer clinical trials: A systematic review of barriers and interventions , 2020, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[10]  J. Unger,et al.  Capacity to Provide Geriatric Specialty Care for Older Adults in Community Oncology Practices. , 2020, The oncologist.

[11]  Xiaoyi Wang,et al.  The effect of reduced RDI of chemotherapy on the outcome of breast cancer patients , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[12]  G. Babiera,et al.  Association of Chemotherapy With Survival in Elderly Patients With Multiple Comorbidities and Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Node-Positive Breast Cancer. , 2020, JAMA oncology.

[13]  Jingmei Li,et al.  Impact of deviation from guideline recommended treatment on breast cancer survival in Asia , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[14]  S. Mohile,et al.  Barriers to clinical trial enrollment of older adults with cancer: A qualitative study of the perceptions of community and academic oncologists. , 2020, Journal of geriatric oncology.

[15]  Charles R. Thomas,et al.  Factors Associated With Age Disparities Among Cancer Clinical Trial Participants. , 2019, JAMA oncology.

[16]  J. Sanmugarajah,et al.  Maintaining Dose Intensity of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Older Patients With Breast Cancer , 2018, Clinical breast cancer.

[17]  A. Deal,et al.  Frailty Index Developed From a Cancer-Specific Geriatric Assessment and the Association With Mortality Among Older Adults With Cancer. , 2017, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[18]  H. Cohen,et al.  Validation of a Prediction Tool for Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Adults With Cancer. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  W. Wood,et al.  Geriatric assessment-identified deficits in older cancer patients with normal performance status. , 2015, The oncologist.

[20]  A. Deal,et al.  Geriatric assessment as an aide to understanding falls in older adults with cancer , 2015, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[21]  G. Lyman,et al.  A retrospective evaluation of chemotherapy dose intensity and supportive care for early-stage breast cancer in a curative setting , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[22]  D. Cutter,et al.  Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100 000 women in 123 randomised trials , 2012, The Lancet.

[23]  V. Coyle,et al.  Achieving Optimal Dose Intensity with Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Breast Cancer Patients: A 10‐Year Retrospective Study in a UK Institution , 2012, The breast journal.

[24]  N. Ngamphaiboon,et al.  Febrile neutropenia in adjuvant docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) with prophylactic pegfilgrastim in breast cancer patients: a retrospective analysis , 2012, Medical Oncology.

[25]  Supriya G Mohile,et al.  Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  H. Wildiers,et al.  Relative dose intensity of chemotherapy and its impact on outcomes in patients with early breast cancer or aggressive lymphoma. , 2011, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[27]  Shuangzhe Liu,et al.  Regression diagnostics , 2020, Applied Quantitative Analysis for Real Estate.

[28]  S. Welch,et al.  Relative dose intensity delivered to patients with early breast cancer: Canadian experience. , 2009, Current Oncology.

[29]  F. Holmes,et al.  Docetaxel With Cyclophosphamide Is Associated With an Overall Survival Benefit Compared With Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide: 7-Year Follow-Up of US Oncology Research Trial 9735. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  J. Thigpen Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Older Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer , 2009 .

[31]  I. Chirivella,et al.  Optimal delivery of anthracycline-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting improves outcome of breast cancer patients , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[32]  F. Holmes,et al.  Phase III trial comparing doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide with docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant therapy for operable breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  J. Goodwin,et al.  Use and outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  G. Lyman,et al.  Predictors of reduced dose intensity in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy , 2006, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[35]  H. Cohen,et al.  Developing a cancer‐specific geriatric assessment , 2005, Cancer.

[36]  H. Cohen,et al.  Developing a cancer-specific geriatric assessment : A feasibility study , 2005 .

[37]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Methodological challenges in the evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancer , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[38]  G. Lyman,et al.  Incidence and predictors of low dose-intensity in adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy: a nationwide study of community practices. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  Barbara L. Smith,et al.  Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  M. Gnant,et al.  Randomized adjuvant trial of tamoxifen and goserelin versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil: evidence for the superiority of treatment with endocrine blockade in premenopausal patients with hormone-responsive breast cancer--Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial 5. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  I. Tannock,et al.  Analysis of the prognostic effects of inclusion in a clinical trial and of myelosuppression on survival after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma , 2001, Cancer.

[42]  L Biganzoli,et al.  The impact of chemotherapy dose density and dose intensity on breast cancer outcome: what have we learned? , 2000, European journal of cancer.

[43]  J. Chang,et al.  Chemotherapy dose reduction and delay in clinical practice. evaluating the risk to patient outcome in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. , 2000, European journal of cancer.

[44]  Robert Gray,et al.  A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk , 1999 .

[45]  D A Berry,et al.  Dose and dose intensity as determinants of outcome in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[46]  G. Bonadonna,et al.  Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer: the results of 20 years of follow-up. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[47]  Emmanuel Lesaffre,et al.  Collinearity in generalized linear regression , 1993 .

[48]  P. Duffey,et al.  The calculation of actual or received dose intensity: a comparison of published methods. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[49]  Anna L. Brown,et al.  Two months of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide with and without interval reinduction therapy compared with 6 months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in positive-node breast cancer patients with tamoxifen-nonresponsive tumors: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowe , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[50]  W. Hryniuk Dose intensity: a critique of a critical review. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[51]  W. Hryniuk Correlation of dose intensity and prognosis in adjuvant chemotherapy: an extended controversy. , 1989, Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer.

[52]  M. Levine,et al.  Analysis of dose intensity for adjuvant chemotherapy trials in stage II breast cancer. , 1986, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[53]  C. D. Beaumont,et al.  Regression Diagnostics — Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity , 1981 .