IT Adaptation Patterns to Enterprise-wide Systems

The introduction of enterprise-wide systems requires users to simultaneously adjust to both the new system’s requirements and changes associated with modified business processes—an adaptation that often goes beyond conspicuous behavioral elements. Therefore, to investigate the underlying attributes that characterize user interaction with and adaptation to information technology (IT), we collected data from four organizations that had implemented enterprise-wide systems for at least three years prior to commencing fieldwork. By taking a grounded theory approach, we identify four distinct adaptation patterns: reluctant, compliant, faithful, and enthusiastic. These patterns represent configurations of five interrelated attributes that users espouse in their interaction with enterprise-wide systems: attitude towards the system, approach to learning how to use the system, level of interaction with the system, exploration of system features, and stance towards changing work practices. We propose an emergent, substantive theory of IT adaptation patterns that explains the intricate interplay of individual, task, and organizational initiatives in shaping these adaptation patterns.

[1]  Andrew Burton-Jones,et al.  From Use to Effective Use: A Representation Theory Perspective , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Cathy Urquhart,et al.  Grounded Theory Method: The Researcher as Blank Slate and Other Myths , 2006, ICIS.

[3]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[4]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  IT Feature Use over Time and its Impact on Individual Task Performance , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[5]  B. Glaser Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[6]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Misalignments in ERP Implementation: A Dialectic Perspective , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[8]  Alexander Maedche,et al.  The Effect of User Adaptation on the Effective Use of Enterprise Systems , 2015, ICIS.

[9]  R. Suddaby From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not , 2006 .

[10]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  M. Patton Qualitative research & evaluation methods , 2002 .

[12]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  A Multilevel Model of Resistance to Information Technology Implementation , 2005, MIS Q..

[13]  Ryad Titah,et al.  Information System Use - Related Activity: An Expanded Behavioral Conceptualization of Individual-Level Information System Use , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Barney G. Glaser,et al.  Doing Formal Theory , 2007 .

[15]  Jagdip Singh,et al.  When consumers complain: A path analysis of the key antecedents of consumer complaint response estimates , 1996 .

[16]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations , 2011 .

[17]  Heshan Sun,et al.  Understanding User Revisions When Using Information Systems Features: Adaptive System Use and Triggers , 2012, MIS Q..

[18]  R. Woodman,et al.  Organizational change and information technology: Managing on the edge of cyberspace , 1994 .

[19]  Cathy Urquhart,et al.  Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[20]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[21]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Nature and Determinants of IT Acceptance, Routinization, and Infusion , 1993, Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology.

[22]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[23]  Walter Fernandez,et al.  Using the Glaserian Approach in Grounded Studies of Emerging Business Practices , 2004 .

[24]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: a theoretical model and empirical test , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Anne Beaudry,et al.  Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaption , 2005, MIS Q..

[26]  M. Patrickson Adaptation by employees to new technology , 1986 .

[27]  Yizhou Li,et al.  Explaining the Influence of Workarounds on Effective Use - the Case of a supply Chain Management System , 2017, ECIS.

[28]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[30]  Anne Beaudry,et al.  The Other Side of Acceptance: Studying the Direct and Indirect Effects of Emotions on Information Technology Use , 2010, MIS Q..

[31]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[32]  Qing Hu,et al.  From transactional user to VIP: how organizational and cognitive factors affect ERP assimilation at individual level , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  ERP in Practice: A Snapshot of Post-Installation Perception and Behaviors , 2008, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[34]  C. Urquhart Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide , 2012 .

[35]  ชวิตรา ตันติมาลา Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis , 2017 .

[36]  Liette Lapointe,et al.  Enhanced Use of IT: A New Perspective on Post-Adoption , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Moving Beyond Intentions and Toward the Theory of Trying: Effects of Work Environment and Gender on Post-Adoption Information Technology Use , 2005, MIS Q..

[38]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[39]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research , 2013 .

[40]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[41]  E. Pulakos,et al.  Adaptability in the workplace: development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  Jane Webster,et al.  An Investigation of Information Systems Use Patterns: Technological Events as Triggers, the Effect of Time, and Consequences for Performance , 2013, MIS Q..

[43]  Мин Чжо,et al.  Methods and systems for translating from one language to another , 2004 .

[44]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[45]  A. Tsui,et al.  Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[46]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[47]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[48]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[49]  R. Lazarus Coping theory and research: past, present, and future. , 1993, Psychosomatic medicine.

[50]  Elizabeth Chell,et al.  Critical incident technique. , 2003 .

[51]  Walter Fernandez,et al.  Case Studies And Grounded Theory Method In Information Systems Research: Issues And Use , 2011 .

[52]  Sue Newell,et al.  Coping with Information Technology: Mixed Emotions, Vacillation, and Nonconforming Use Patterns , 2015, MIS Q..

[53]  Benjamin Müller,et al.  Adopt, Adapt, Enact or Use? - A Framework and Methodology for Extracting and Integrating Conceptual Mechanisms of IT Adoption and Use , 2014, IS&O.