LA NEGOCIACIÓN DE PROCESOS DE ESCRITURA A TRAVÉS DE LA VIDEOCOMUNICACIÓN

Despres d'una introduccio epistemologica a la col·laboracio entre tutors i estudiants en processos d'escriptura en L2 segons teories constructivistes, abordarem estudis que han investigat la negociacio en escriptura utilitzant entorns digitals sincronics, com el xat, o multimodals, com la audioconferencia. Una vegada establert el marc d'aproximacio teoric-empirica presentarem els resultats d'un estudi de cas que es va dur a terme dins del projecte europeu NIFLAR (Networked Interaction in Foreign Language Acquisition and Research), en el qual s'analitza la interaccio que es genera entre el tutor (professor en formacio de la Universitat de Valencia) i l'estudiant d'espanyol de la Universitat de Utrecht en el proces de revisio per video-comunicacio d'un text redactat per l'estudiant. Analitzarem el discorrer de la interaccio en linia entre tutor i estudiant, prestant especial atencio al tipus de feedback o retroalimentacio que ofereix el tutor, sigui aquest positiu (per fomentar l'empatia i motivacio de l'alumne) o negatiu (la senyalitzacio d'algun error de forma implicita o explicita). A continuacio, estudiarem l'efecte que el tipus de retroalimentacio te en l'estudiant i l'accio que genera i, finalment, observarem com l'entorn multimodal incideix en el proces de negociacio

[1]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[2]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Teaching and Researching Writing , 2001 .

[3]  D. Ferris.  The ‘‘Grammar Correction’ ’ Debate in L2 Writing: , 2022 .

[4]  Olga S. Villamil,et al.  Peer Revision in the L2 Classroom: Social-Cognitive Activities, Mediating Strategies, and Aspects of Social Behavior. , 1996 .

[5]  Daniel Cassany.  Construir la escritura , 1999 .

[6]  J. Belz.  Linguistic Perspectives on the Development of Intercultural Competence in Telecollaboration. , 2003 .

[7]  Michael H. Long,et al.  OPTIMAL PSYCHOLINGUISTIC ENVIRONMENTS FOR DISTANCE FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING , 2003 .

[8]  Dana R. Ferris,et al.  ERROR FEEDBACK IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: HOW EXPLICIT DOES IT NEED TO BE? , 2001 .

[9]  M. Byram.  Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence , 1997 .

[10]  Kristi Jauregi,et al.  Virtual interaction through video-web communication: A step towards enriching and internationalizing language learning programs , 2008, ReCALL.

[11]  Mirjam Hauck.  Telecollaboration: At the interface between Multimodal and Intercultural Communicative Competence , 2010 .

[12]  L. V. Lier.  Interaction in the Language Curriculum: Awareness, Autonomy and Authenticity , 1996 .

[13]  J. Truscott,et al.  EVIDENCE AND CONJECTURE ON THE EFFECTS OF CORRECTION: A RESPONSE TO CHANDLER , 2004 .

[14]  Jean Chandler,et al.  THE EFFICACY OF VARIOUS KINDS OF ERROR FEEDBACK FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THE ACCURACY AND FLUENCY OF L2 STUDENT WRITING , 2003 .

[15]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Language and Power , 2009 .

[16]  Robert O'Dowd,et al.  Critical issues in telecollaborative task design , 2009 .

[17]  Yuping Wang,et al.  Task Design in Videoconferencing-Supported Distance Language Learning. , 2013 .

[18]  Thierry Chanier,et al.  Developing online multimodal verbal communication to enhance the writing process in an audio-graphic conferencing environment , 2008, ReCALL.

[19]  Merrill Swain,et al.  Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching, and Testing , 2013 .

[20]  Jane Willis,et al.  A Framework for Task-Based Learning , 1996 .

[21]  Rod Ellis,et al.  Task-based Language Learning and Teaching , 2003 .

[22]  P. Ng,et al.  Analyzing Talk in ESL Peer Response Groups: Stances, Functions, and Content , 1995 .

[23]  Ana Oskoz,et al.  COLLABORATIVE WRITING: FOSTERING FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND WRITING CONVENTIONS DEVELOPMENT , 2010 .

[24]  Susana M. Sotillo.  Corrective Feedback via Instant Messenger Learning Activities in NS-NNS and NNS-NNS Dyads , 2013 .

[25]  J. Lantolf,et al.  Negative Feedback as Regulation and Second Language Learning in the Zone of Proximal Development , 1994 .

[26]  Interacción virtual a través de la videocomunicación y mundos virtuales: dos estudios piloto , 2010 .

[27]  Olga S. Villamil,et al.  Activating the ZPD: Mutual Scaffolding in L2 Peer Revision , 2000 .

[28]  A. Tsui,et al.  Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments , 2000 .

[29]  Bernd-Dietrich Müller.  LINGUISTIC AWARENESS OF CULTURES. PRINCIPLES OF A TRAINING MODULE , 2003 .

[30]  John Truscott,et al.  Review Article The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes , 1996 .

[31]  Bryan Smith.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED NEGOTIATED INTERACTION AND LEXICAL ACQUISITION , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[32]  M. Warschauer.  Comparing Face-To-Face and Electronic Discussion in the Second Language Classroom , 2013, CALICO Journal.

[33]  Ton Koenraad,et al.  Verbal interaction in Second Life: towards a pedagogic framework for task design , 2011 .

[34]  L. Vygotsky.  Thinking and Speech , 1987 .

[35]  Paige Ware,et al.  Confidence and competition online: ESL student perspectives on web-based discussions in the classroom , 2004 .

[36]  Jean Chandler.  A response to Truscott , 2004 .

[37]  Richard Schmidt,et al.  Consciousness, Learning and Interlanguage Pragmatics , 1990 .

[38]  Lina Lee,et al.  FOCUS-ON-FORM THROUGH COLLABORATIVE SCAFFOLDING IN EXPERT-TO-NOVICE ONLINE INTERACTION , 2008 .

[39]  Randall W. Sadler,et al.  The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing , 2003 .

[40]  E. Berg,et al.  The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality , 1999 .