FMBEM analysis of sound scattering from a damping plate in the near field of a hydrophone

As part of research into the effect of underwater noise on the communication between an under-ice Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) and it’s stationary launch vessel (the Aurora Australis), fast multipole boundary element method (FMBEM) acoustic modeling was conducted. In particular, a steel damping plate with a complex 3-dimensional structure was modeled (using up to 1.6 x 10 5 boundary elements) and the effect of sound scattering from a pinger near the ship was determined at the receiver hydrophone, which was in close proximity to the damping plate. The direct incident field from the pinger was modeled as a plane wave at a number of incidence angles (to account for the depths to which the hydrophone was lowered) and over a range of frequencies up to the pinger frequency of 10kHz. This paper presents these results and discusses some of the interesting effects observed at the ‘non-unique’ frequencies when using the different methods available to provide stability to the numerical solution. Thus far, the modeling conducted for the damping plate has treated the object as rigid. The FMBEM code being developed at CMST now has the capability to model fully coupled fluid-structure interactions and some initial results from treating the damping plate as elastic are also presented.

[1]  Yijun Liu Fast Multipole Boundary Element Method: Theory and Applications in Engineering , 2009 .

[2]  Sean F. Wu,et al.  The Boundary Element Method in Acoustics , 2000 .

[3]  R. Coifman,et al.  The fast multipole method for the wave equation: a pedestrian prescription , 1993, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[4]  Frank Ihlenburg,et al.  Sound in Vibrating Cabins: Physical Effects, Mathematical Formulation, Computational Simulation with FEM , 2008 .

[5]  W. Hwang Hypersingular boundary integral equations for exterior acoustic problems , 1997 .

[6]  S. Chaillat Fast Multipole Method for 3-D elastodynamic boundary integral equations. Application to seismic wave propagation , 2008 .

[7]  Weng Cho Chew,et al.  Nyström method for elastic wave scattering by three-dimensional obstacles , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[8]  Sakari Inawashiro,et al.  On the Acoustic Radiation from a Flanged Circular Pipe , 1960 .

[9]  S. Amini,et al.  Multi-level fast multipole solution of the scattering problem , 2003 .

[10]  J. Reddy An introduction to nonlinear finite element analysis , 2004 .

[11]  F. J. Rizzo,et al.  A weakly singular form of the hypersingular boundary integral equation applied to 3-D acoustic wave problems , 1992 .

[12]  M. Bonnet Boundary Integral Equation Methods for Solids and Fluids , 1999 .

[13]  G. F. Miller,et al.  The application of integral equation methods to the numerical solution of some exterior boundary-value problems , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[14]  Fridolin P. Mechel Formulas of Acoustics , 2004 .

[15]  Steffen Marburg,et al.  Treating the Phenomenon of Irregular Frequencies , 2008 .

[16]  Lothar Gaul,et al.  Fast BEM-FEM mortar coupling for acoustic-structure interaction , 2005 .

[17]  L. Gaul,et al.  Simulation of Elastic Scattering with a Coupled FMBE-FE Approach , 2009 .

[18]  S. Schneider FE/FMBE coupling to model fluid–structure interaction , 2008 .

[19]  T. K. Rengarajan,et al.  The use of CHIEF to obtain unique solutions for acoustic radiation using boundary‐integral equations , 1987 .

[21]  David T. Wilton,et al.  Coupled Boundary and Finite Element Methods for the Solution of the Dynamic Fluid-Structure Interaction Problem , 1992 .

[22]  R. Duraiswami,et al.  Fast Multipole Methods for the Helmholtz Equation in Three Dimensions , 2005 .

[23]  C. Rajakumar,et al.  The Boundary Element Method: Applications in Sound and Vibration , 2004 .

[24]  Hiroyuki Fujiwara,et al.  The fast multipole method for solving integral equations ofthree‐dimensional topography and basin problems , 2000 .

[25]  Neil Shaw FORMULAS OF ACOUSTICS , 2005 .

[26]  Mario Bebendorf,et al.  Comparison of the Fast Multipole Method with Hierarchical Matrices for the Helmholtz-BEM , 2010 .

[27]  Qibai Huang,et al.  An improved form of the hypersingular boundary integral equation for exterior acoustic problems , 2010 .

[28]  Long Chen FINITE ELEMENT METHOD , 2013 .

[29]  Ramani Duraiswami,et al.  Recursions for the Computation of Multipole Translation and Rotation Coefficients for the 3-D Helmholtz Equation , 2003, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[30]  Lothar Gaul,et al.  A comparison of FE–BE coupling schemes for large‐scale problems with fluid–structure interaction , 2009 .

[31]  Hong Xiao,et al.  Numerical experiments of preconditioned Krylov subspace methods solving the dense non-symmetric systems arising from BEM , 2007 .

[32]  Philippe Guillemain,et al.  Approximation formulae for the acoustic radiation impedance of a cylindrical pipe , 2008, 0811.3625.

[33]  Stéphanie Chaillat,et al.  Multi-Level Fast Multipole BEM for 3-D Elastodynamics , 2009 .

[34]  S. Marburg Discretization Requirements: How many Elements per Wavelength are Necessary? , 2008 .

[35]  W. Kuperman,et al.  Computational Ocean Acoustics , 1994 .

[36]  G. Karami Lecture Notes in Engineering , 1989 .

[37]  Ramani Duraiswami,et al.  A Broadband Fast Multipole Accelerated Boundary Element Method for the 3D Helmholtz Equation , 2008 .

[38]  N. Nishimura Fast multipole accelerated boundary integral equation methods , 2002 .

[39]  H. A. Schenck Improved Integral Formulation for Acoustic Radiation Problems , 1968 .

[40]  R. Duraiswami,et al.  Fast Multipole Accelerated Boundary Element Methods for the 3D Helmholtz Equation , 2008 .